On the optimality of voronoi‐based column selection

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Maria Emelianenko, Guy B. Oldaker
{"title":"On the optimality of voronoi‐based column selection","authors":"Maria Emelianenko, Guy B. Oldaker","doi":"10.1002/num.23137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While there exists a rich array of matrix column subset selection problem (CSSP) algorithms for use with interpolative and CUR‐type decompositions, their use can often become prohibitive as the size of the input matrix increases. In an effort to address these issues, in earlier work we developed a general framework that pairs a column‐partitioning routine with a column‐selection algorithm. Two of the four algorithms presented in that work paired the Centroidal Voronoi Orthogonal Decomposition (<jats:styled-content>CVOD</jats:styled-content>; <jats:italic>Centroidal Voronoi Tessellation Based Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Analysis</jats:italic>, 2003, 137–150) and an adaptive variant (<jats:styled-content>adaptCVOD</jats:styled-content>) with the Discrete Empirical Interpolation Method (<jats:styled-content>DEIM; <jats:italic>SIAM J. Sci. Computer</jats:italic>. 38 (2016), no. 3, A1454–A1482</jats:styled-content>). In this work, we extend this framework and pair the <jats:styled-content>CVOD</jats:styled-content>‐type algorithms with any CSSP algorithm that returns linearly independent columns. Our results include detailed error bounds for the solutions provided by these paired algorithms, as well as expressions that explicitly characterize how the quality of the selected column partition affects the resulting CSSP solution. In addition to examples involving matrix approximation, we test several of our partition‐based constructions on tasks commonly encountered in model order reduction (MOR).","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/num.23137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While there exists a rich array of matrix column subset selection problem (CSSP) algorithms for use with interpolative and CUR‐type decompositions, their use can often become prohibitive as the size of the input matrix increases. In an effort to address these issues, in earlier work we developed a general framework that pairs a column‐partitioning routine with a column‐selection algorithm. Two of the four algorithms presented in that work paired the Centroidal Voronoi Orthogonal Decomposition (CVOD; Centroidal Voronoi Tessellation Based Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Analysis, 2003, 137–150) and an adaptive variant (adaptCVOD) with the Discrete Empirical Interpolation Method (DEIM; SIAM J. Sci. Computer. 38 (2016), no. 3, A1454–A1482). In this work, we extend this framework and pair the CVOD‐type algorithms with any CSSP algorithm that returns linearly independent columns. Our results include detailed error bounds for the solutions provided by these paired algorithms, as well as expressions that explicitly characterize how the quality of the selected column partition affects the resulting CSSP solution. In addition to examples involving matrix approximation, we test several of our partition‐based constructions on tasks commonly encountered in model order reduction (MOR).
基于 voronoi 的列选择的最优性
虽然有一系列丰富的矩阵列子集选择问题(CSSP)算法可用于内插法和 CUR 型分解,但随着输入矩阵的增大,这些算法的使用往往会变得令人望而却步。为了解决这些问题,我们在早期的工作中开发了一个通用框架,将列分割例程与列选择算法配对使用。在该工作中提出的四种算法中,有两种将中心伏罗诺正交分解法(CVOD;Centroidal Voronoi Tessellation Based Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Analysis,2003,137-150)和自适应变体(adaptCVOD)与离散经验插值法(DEIM;SIAM J. Sci. Computer.38 (2016), no.3,A1454-A1482)。在这项工作中,我们扩展了这一框架,并将 CVOD 类型算法与任何返回线性独立列的 CSSP 算法配对。我们的结果包括这些配对算法所提供解的详细误差边界,以及明确描述所选列分割质量如何影响 CSSP 解的表达式。除了涉及矩阵逼近的示例外,我们还在模型阶次缩减 (MOR) 中经常遇到的任务上测试了我们的几种基于分区的构造。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信