Effects of resource spatial distribution, tow overlap, and positional error in the estimation of dredge efficiency

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES
{"title":"Effects of resource spatial distribution, tow overlap, and positional error in the estimation of dredge efficiency","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Assessing the efficiency of fishing gears, i.e. the fraction of fish in the gear path that are caught and retained, is essential for providing reliable abundance estimates in the management of sedentary invertebrate fisheries. While various methods have been proposed for estimating gear efficiency from experiments, each approach has its strengths and weaknesses, influenced by factors such as resource distribution, tow overlap, and positional errors. In this study, we conducted simulations to gauge the accuracy and precision of four different methods commonly used for estimating gear efficiency and initial density in depletion experiments: Leslie-Davis, DeLury, Removal, and Patch; considering different spatial arrangements of resources, degrees of tow overlap, and positional inaccuracies. We followed designs used in depletion experiments conducted in the Patagonian scallop fishery, commonly employed in scallops and other sedentary species’ fisheries. Our findings reveal that the Patch model, which is specifically harnessed to account for the spatial impact of tows, outperforms the others in terms of accuracy and precision, provided there is no positional error. Estimation of initial density in the simulated depletion experiments showed a similar pattern than that for gear efficiency. The spatial distribution of scallops had no noticeable effect on the precision and bias of efficiency and intial density estimates for any of the models. This holds across all scenarios of spatial clustering and tow overlap. However, when high positional errors in tow locations are at play, the Patch model’s performance is comparable to the other methods. The study highlights the advantages of the Patch model, especially in light of the current availability of high-precision GPS systems that can accurately track tow locations. We also discuss why traditional models may be less suitable for sedentary benthic species, underscoring the importance of selecting appropriate methodologies for specific fishery management tasks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50443,"journal":{"name":"Fisheries Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisheries Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783624002029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing the efficiency of fishing gears, i.e. the fraction of fish in the gear path that are caught and retained, is essential for providing reliable abundance estimates in the management of sedentary invertebrate fisheries. While various methods have been proposed for estimating gear efficiency from experiments, each approach has its strengths and weaknesses, influenced by factors such as resource distribution, tow overlap, and positional errors. In this study, we conducted simulations to gauge the accuracy and precision of four different methods commonly used for estimating gear efficiency and initial density in depletion experiments: Leslie-Davis, DeLury, Removal, and Patch; considering different spatial arrangements of resources, degrees of tow overlap, and positional inaccuracies. We followed designs used in depletion experiments conducted in the Patagonian scallop fishery, commonly employed in scallops and other sedentary species’ fisheries. Our findings reveal that the Patch model, which is specifically harnessed to account for the spatial impact of tows, outperforms the others in terms of accuracy and precision, provided there is no positional error. Estimation of initial density in the simulated depletion experiments showed a similar pattern than that for gear efficiency. The spatial distribution of scallops had no noticeable effect on the precision and bias of efficiency and intial density estimates for any of the models. This holds across all scenarios of spatial clustering and tow overlap. However, when high positional errors in tow locations are at play, the Patch model’s performance is comparable to the other methods. The study highlights the advantages of the Patch model, especially in light of the current availability of high-precision GPS systems that can accurately track tow locations. We also discuss why traditional models may be less suitable for sedentary benthic species, underscoring the importance of selecting appropriate methodologies for specific fishery management tasks.

资源空间分布、拖网重叠和位置误差对疏浚效率估算的影响
评估渔具效率,即在渔具路径中被捕获和保留的鱼的比例,对于在定居无脊椎动物渔业管理中提供可靠的丰量估计至关重要。虽然已经提出了多种从实验中估算渔具效率的方法,但每种方法都有其优缺点,受到资源分布、拖网重叠和位置误差等因素的影响。在这项研究中,我们进行了模拟,以衡量四种不同方法的准确性和精确性,这四种方法通常用于估算损耗实验中的渔具效率和初始密度:Leslie-Davis、DeLury、Removal 和 Patch;考虑了不同的资源空间布局、拖网重叠程度和位置误差。我们沿用了在巴塔哥尼亚扇贝渔业中进行的枯竭试验中使用的设计,这些设计通常用于扇贝和其他定居物种渔业。我们的研究结果表明,在不存在位置误差的情况下,专门用于考虑拖网空间影响的 "补丁 "模型在准确性和精确度方面优于其他模型。在模拟枯竭实验中,对初始密度的估计显示出与渔具效率类似的模式。扇贝的空间分布对任何模型的效率和初始密度估算的精度和偏差都没有明显影响。这一点在空间集群和拖网重叠的所有情况下都适用。然而,当拖网位置的位置误差较大时,Patch 模型的性能与其他方法不相上下。这项研究凸显了 Patch 模型的优势,尤其是考虑到目前高精度 GPS 系统可以精确追踪拖网位置。我们还讨论了为什么传统模型可能不太适合定居底栖物种,强调了为特定渔业管理任务选择适当方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fisheries Research
Fisheries Research 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal provides an international forum for the publication of papers in the areas of fisheries science, fishing technology, fisheries management and relevant socio-economics. The scope covers fisheries in salt, brackish and freshwater systems, and all aspects of associated ecology, environmental aspects of fisheries, and economics. Both theoretical and practical papers are acceptable, including laboratory and field experimental studies relevant to fisheries. Papers on the conservation of exploitable living resources are welcome. Review and Viewpoint articles are also published. As the specified areas inevitably impinge on and interrelate with each other, the approach of the journal is multidisciplinary, and authors are encouraged to emphasise the relevance of their own work to that of other disciplines. The journal is intended for fisheries scientists, biological oceanographers, gear technologists, economists, managers, administrators, policy makers and legislators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信