Pet Owners’ Preferences for Quality of Life Improvements and Costs Related to Innovative Therapies in Feline Pain Associated with Osteoarthritis—A Quantitative Survey

Animals Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.3390/ani14162308
Andrea Wright, Edwina Gildea, Louise Longstaff, Danielle Riley, N. Nagda, Kristina DiPietrantonio, A. Enstone, Robin Wyn, David Bartram
{"title":"Pet Owners’ Preferences for Quality of Life Improvements and Costs Related to Innovative Therapies in Feline Pain Associated with Osteoarthritis—A Quantitative Survey","authors":"Andrea Wright, Edwina Gildea, Louise Longstaff, Danielle Riley, N. Nagda, Kristina DiPietrantonio, A. Enstone, Robin Wyn, David Bartram","doi":"10.3390/ani14162308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed to explore UK cat owners’ preferences for treatments for feline osteoarthritis (OA) by exploring preferences around quality of life (QoL) improvements, safety considerations, and costs associated with hypothetical innovative pain therapies. Aspects identified in an existing conceptual framework were extracted for inclusion in exploratory interviews with cat owners (n = 3) to identify key domains that contribute to the QoL of cats. QoL descriptions for cats with OA and hypothetical product attributes were developed and validated through interviews with veterinarians (n = 3). An online survey was subsequently shared with 255 pet owners in the UK. Pet owners were presented with QoL descriptions and hypothetical product attributes to gather their preferences for QoL improvements and their willingness to pay (WTP) for (unbranded) pain therapies at various price points. Pet owners were motivated to improve their cats’ QoL, which translated into WTP for therapies; specifically, pet owners valued QoL improvements in mobility, pain expression, and well-being. When presented with a product profile of the hypothetical novel monoclonal antibody (mAb) and cost, 50% of cat owners were willing to pay more for a mAb that is expected to have improved efficacy and safety when compared to a hypothetical standard of care (SoC). Significantly more pet owners preferred the mAb than the SoC when price was not presented (p < 0.01), with product efficacy and safety driving pet owners’ decision-making. The majority of pet owners did not agree that taking their cats to the veterinarian once a month for their treatment would be burdensome. Cat owners in the UK are motivated to improve their cats’ QoL, which translates into WTP for the efficacious treatment of pain associated with osteoarthritis. Veterinarians should offer cat owners the pain treatment they feel is best suited for improving the cat’s QoL and to ensure subsequent owner-pet bond is preserved.","PeriodicalId":502248,"journal":{"name":"Animals","volume":"55 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aimed to explore UK cat owners’ preferences for treatments for feline osteoarthritis (OA) by exploring preferences around quality of life (QoL) improvements, safety considerations, and costs associated with hypothetical innovative pain therapies. Aspects identified in an existing conceptual framework were extracted for inclusion in exploratory interviews with cat owners (n = 3) to identify key domains that contribute to the QoL of cats. QoL descriptions for cats with OA and hypothetical product attributes were developed and validated through interviews with veterinarians (n = 3). An online survey was subsequently shared with 255 pet owners in the UK. Pet owners were presented with QoL descriptions and hypothetical product attributes to gather their preferences for QoL improvements and their willingness to pay (WTP) for (unbranded) pain therapies at various price points. Pet owners were motivated to improve their cats’ QoL, which translated into WTP for therapies; specifically, pet owners valued QoL improvements in mobility, pain expression, and well-being. When presented with a product profile of the hypothetical novel monoclonal antibody (mAb) and cost, 50% of cat owners were willing to pay more for a mAb that is expected to have improved efficacy and safety when compared to a hypothetical standard of care (SoC). Significantly more pet owners preferred the mAb than the SoC when price was not presented (p < 0.01), with product efficacy and safety driving pet owners’ decision-making. The majority of pet owners did not agree that taking their cats to the veterinarian once a month for their treatment would be burdensome. Cat owners in the UK are motivated to improve their cats’ QoL, which translates into WTP for the efficacious treatment of pain associated with osteoarthritis. Veterinarians should offer cat owners the pain treatment they feel is best suited for improving the cat’s QoL and to ensure subsequent owner-pet bond is preserved.
宠物主人对改善猫科动物骨关节炎相关疼痛的生活质量和创新疗法相关成本的偏好--定量调查
本研究旨在探讨英国猫主人对猫骨关节炎(OA)治疗方法的偏好,方法是围绕生活质量(QoL)的改善、安全性考虑因素以及与假定的创新疼痛疗法相关的成本来探讨猫主人的偏好。在对猫主人(n = 3)进行探索性访谈时,提取了现有概念框架中确定的各个方面,以确定有助于提高猫咪生活质量的关键领域。通过与兽医(n = 3)的访谈,为患有 OA 的猫制定了 QoL 描述并验证了假设的产品属性。随后与英国的 255 位宠物主人进行了在线调查。向宠物主人展示了 QoL 描述和假设的产品属性,以收集他们对改善 QoL 的偏好以及对不同价位(无品牌)疼痛疗法的支付意愿 (WTP)。宠物主人希望改善猫咪的 QoL,并将其转化为对疗法的 WTP;特别是,宠物主人重视在活动能力、疼痛表现和幸福感方面改善 QoL。当看到假定的新型单克隆抗体(mAb)的产品简介和成本时,50% 的猫主人愿意为与假定的标准护理(SoC)相比有望提高疗效和安全性的 mAb 支付更多费用。在不考虑价格的情况下,选择 mAb 的宠物主人明显多于选择 SoC 的宠物主人(p < 0.01),产品的疗效和安全性是宠物主人做出决定的主要原因。大多数宠物主人不认为每月带猫咪去兽医那里接受一次治疗会造成负担。英国的猫主人希望改善猫咪的 QoL,这就转化成了有效治疗骨关节炎相关疼痛的 WTP。兽医应为猫主人提供他们认为最适合改善猫咪生活质量的疼痛治疗方法,并确保后续的主人与宠物关系得到维护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信