Cognitive Load and Dual-Task Performance in Individuals with and without Forward Head Posture

Shorouk Abu-Ghosh, I. Moustafa, Amal Ahbouch, P. Oakley, D. Harrison
{"title":"Cognitive Load and Dual-Task Performance in Individuals with and without Forward Head Posture","authors":"Shorouk Abu-Ghosh, I. Moustafa, Amal Ahbouch, P. Oakley, D. Harrison","doi":"10.3390/jcm13164653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recent studies have found forward head posture (FHP) is associated with altered physiology. There is a lack of research into whether FHP is associated with altered gait parameters when cognitively challenged. Our hypothesis is that individuals with FHP and those without will demonstrate different responses when undergoing dual-task assessment. Methods: Forty-five asymptomatic participants with FHP, defined as a craniovertebral angle (CVA) < 50°, were matched to forty-five participants with normal head posture (NHP) with a CVA > 55°. Participants walked along a 10 m platform under a control condition (no cognitive load) while an optical motion-capture system assessed gait kinematics. Secondly, participants were assessed under a dual-task cognitive load condition to identify the impact on gait kinematics. Results: Under the single-task condition, there were no significant differences for any gait parameter. In the dual-task condition, 12/13 gait parameters were significantly altered for the FHP vs. NHP group (p < 0.01). A calculation of the dual-task cost (DTC) percentage showed significant increases in all gait parameters in participants with FHP (p < 0.02). Correlations between the CVA and gait parameters were not significant for the single-task condition, but all gait parameters were correlated to CVA for the dual-task condition (p < 0.01). The correlation between CVA and DTC for all gait variables was significant (p < 0.04). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that FHP significantly increases the cognitive cost during walking, highlighting the importance of proper postural alignment for maintaining cognitive function under a dual-task condition.","PeriodicalId":510228,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"20 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have found forward head posture (FHP) is associated with altered physiology. There is a lack of research into whether FHP is associated with altered gait parameters when cognitively challenged. Our hypothesis is that individuals with FHP and those without will demonstrate different responses when undergoing dual-task assessment. Methods: Forty-five asymptomatic participants with FHP, defined as a craniovertebral angle (CVA) < 50°, were matched to forty-five participants with normal head posture (NHP) with a CVA > 55°. Participants walked along a 10 m platform under a control condition (no cognitive load) while an optical motion-capture system assessed gait kinematics. Secondly, participants were assessed under a dual-task cognitive load condition to identify the impact on gait kinematics. Results: Under the single-task condition, there were no significant differences for any gait parameter. In the dual-task condition, 12/13 gait parameters were significantly altered for the FHP vs. NHP group (p < 0.01). A calculation of the dual-task cost (DTC) percentage showed significant increases in all gait parameters in participants with FHP (p < 0.02). Correlations between the CVA and gait parameters were not significant for the single-task condition, but all gait parameters were correlated to CVA for the dual-task condition (p < 0.01). The correlation between CVA and DTC for all gait variables was significant (p < 0.04). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that FHP significantly increases the cognitive cost during walking, highlighting the importance of proper postural alignment for maintaining cognitive function under a dual-task condition.
有前倾头姿和没有前倾头姿的人的认知负荷和双任务表现
背景:最近的研究发现,前头姿势(FHP)与生理变化有关。目前还缺乏对 FHP 是否与认知挑战时步态参数的改变有关的研究。我们的假设是,有 FHP 和没有 FHP 的人在接受双重任务评估时会表现出不同的反应。研究方法45 名无症状的 FHP 患者(定义为颅椎夹角(CVA)小于 50°)与 45 名头部姿势正常(NHP)且头椎夹角大于 55°的患者进行配对。参与者在控制条件(无认知负荷)下沿着 10 米平台行走,同时光学运动捕捉系统对步态运动学进行评估。其次,在双任务认知负荷条件下对参与者进行评估,以确定对步态运动学的影响。结果显示在单任务条件下,任何步态参数都没有显著差异。在双任务条件下,FHP 组与 NHP 组相比,有 12/13 个步态参数发生了显著变化(p < 0.01)。双任务成本(DTC)百分比的计算显示,FHP 参与者的所有步态参数都有明显增加(p < 0.02)。在单任务条件下,CVA 和步态参数之间的相关性不显著,但在双任务条件下,所有步态参数都与 CVA 相关(p < 0.01)。在所有步态变量中,CVA 和 DTC 之间的相关性都很显著(p < 0.04)。结论本研究表明,在行走过程中,FHP 会显著增加认知成本,从而突出了在双任务条件下保持正确姿势对齐对维持认知功能的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信