Evaluation of an OSA Risk Screening Smartphone App in a General, Non-Symptomatic Population Sample (ESOSA)

J. Sommer, Lisa Lindner, David T. Kent, Clemens Heiser
{"title":"Evaluation of an OSA Risk Screening Smartphone App in a General, Non-Symptomatic Population Sample (ESOSA)","authors":"J. Sommer, Lisa Lindner, David T. Kent, Clemens Heiser","doi":"10.3390/jcm13164664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Obstructive Sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent sleep disorder, risk factor for cardiovascular disease and imposes a substantial global socioeconomic and health burden. OSA is insufficiently diagnosed as it often presents with unspecific or no symptoms. This study compares the effectiveness of a smartphone-based screening method to polysomnography (PSG) in a general, non-symptomatic population sample. Methods: Adult subjects were recruited from the general population. Subjects reporting OSA-related symptoms suggesting an increased OSA risk were excluded. Included subjects underwent Type-II PSG and a parallel breathing sound analysis using the Snorefox M smartphone app. The PSG scores were compared with the results of the Snorefox M app for its ability to detect moderate to severe OSA (AHI ≥ 15). Results: 150 subjects were included. All subjects completed the diagnostic night, no adverse events occurred. A valid analysis result was obtained for 142 subjects. A total of 24% of subjects had moderate to severe OSA based on the PSG results. The Snorefox M software app showed a sensitivity of 0.91 (0.76, 0.98), specificity of 0.83, PPV of 0.63 (0.48, 0.77), and NPV of 0.97 (0.91, 0.99) to detect AHI ≥ 15 compared with the reference PSG (95% CI). Conclusions: This study compares for the first time, the performance of an app-based OSA screening tool with PSG in a non-symptomatic population sample. Easily accessible screening tools can play a role in complementing existing diagnostic possibilities, helping to increase the diagnosis rate, with a positive effect on cardiovascular health in a relevant population share.","PeriodicalId":510228,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obstructive Sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent sleep disorder, risk factor for cardiovascular disease and imposes a substantial global socioeconomic and health burden. OSA is insufficiently diagnosed as it often presents with unspecific or no symptoms. This study compares the effectiveness of a smartphone-based screening method to polysomnography (PSG) in a general, non-symptomatic population sample. Methods: Adult subjects were recruited from the general population. Subjects reporting OSA-related symptoms suggesting an increased OSA risk were excluded. Included subjects underwent Type-II PSG and a parallel breathing sound analysis using the Snorefox M smartphone app. The PSG scores were compared with the results of the Snorefox M app for its ability to detect moderate to severe OSA (AHI ≥ 15). Results: 150 subjects were included. All subjects completed the diagnostic night, no adverse events occurred. A valid analysis result was obtained for 142 subjects. A total of 24% of subjects had moderate to severe OSA based on the PSG results. The Snorefox M software app showed a sensitivity of 0.91 (0.76, 0.98), specificity of 0.83, PPV of 0.63 (0.48, 0.77), and NPV of 0.97 (0.91, 0.99) to detect AHI ≥ 15 compared with the reference PSG (95% CI). Conclusions: This study compares for the first time, the performance of an app-based OSA screening tool with PSG in a non-symptomatic population sample. Easily accessible screening tools can play a role in complementing existing diagnostic possibilities, helping to increase the diagnosis rate, with a positive effect on cardiovascular health in a relevant population share.
在普通无症状人群样本中评估 OSA 风险筛查智能手机应用程序 (ESOSA)
背景:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是一种普遍存在的睡眠障碍,也是心血管疾病的危险因素,给全球社会经济和健康带来沉重负担。由于阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停通常没有特异性症状或症状不明显,因此诊断率不高。本研究比较了基于智能手机的筛查方法与多导睡眠图(PSG)在普通无症状人群中的有效性。研究方法从普通人群中招募成年受试者。排除了报告 OSA 相关症状、表明 OSA 风险增加的受试者。纳入的受试者使用 Snorefox M 智能手机应用程序进行了 II 型 PSG 和平行呼吸音分析。将 PSG 评分与 Snorefox M 应用程序的结果进行比较,以确定其检测中度至重度 OSA(AHI ≥ 15)的能力。结果:共纳入 150 名受试者。所有受试者均完成了夜间诊断,无不良反应发生。142名受试者获得了有效的分析结果。根据 PSG 结果,共有 24% 的受试者患有中度至重度 OSA。与参考 PSG 相比,Snorefox M 软件应用程序检测 AHI ≥ 15 的灵敏度为 0.91(0.76,0.98),特异度为 0.83,PPV 为 0.63(0.48,0.77),NPV 为 0.97(0.91,0.99)(95% CI)。结论:本研究首次在无症状人群样本中比较了基于应用程序的 OSA 筛查工具与 PSG 的性能。简便易行的筛查工具可以作为现有诊断方法的补充,帮助提高诊断率,对相关人群的心血管健康产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信