Effectiveness of active middle ear implant placement methods in pathological conditions: basilar membrane vibration simulation

Sinyoung Lee, Masaomi Motegi, Takuji Koike
{"title":"Effectiveness of active middle ear implant placement methods in pathological conditions: basilar membrane vibration simulation","authors":"Sinyoung Lee, Masaomi Motegi, Takuji Koike","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2024.1417711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Active middle ear implants (AMEI) amplify mechanical vibrations in the middle ear and transmit them to the cochlea. The AMEI includes a floating mass transducer (FMT) that can be placed using two different surgical approaches: “oval window (OW) vibroplasty” and “round window (RW) vibroplasty.” The OW and RW are windows located on the cochlea. Normally, sound stimulus is transmitted from the middle ear to cochlea via the OW. RW vibroplasty has been suggested as an alternative method due to the difficulty of applying OW vibroplasty in patients with ossicle dysfunction. Several reports compare the advantages of each approach through pre and postoperative hearing tests. However, quantitatively assessing the treatment effect is challenging due to individual differences in pathologies. This study investigates the vibration transmission efficiency of each surgical approach using a finite-element model of the human cochlea. Vibration of the basilar membrane (BM) of the cochlea is simulated by applying the stimulus through the OW or RW. Pathological conditions, such as impaired stapes mobility, are simulated by increasing the stiffness of the stapedial annular ligament. RW closure due to chronic middle ear diseases is a common clinical occurrence and is simulated by increasing the stiffness of the RW membrane in the model. The results show that the vibration amplitude of the BM is larger when the stimulus is applied to the RW compared to the OW, except for cases of RW membrane ossification. The difference in these amplitudes is particularly significant when stapedial mobility is limited. These results suggest that RW vibroplasty would be advantageous, especially in cases of accompanying stapedial mobility impairment. Additionally, it is suggested that transitioning to OW vibroplasty could still ensure a sufficient level of vibratory transmission efficiency when placing the FMT on the RW membrane is difficult due to anatomical problems in the tympanic cavity or confirmed severe pathological conditions around the RW.","PeriodicalId":503840,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1417711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Active middle ear implants (AMEI) amplify mechanical vibrations in the middle ear and transmit them to the cochlea. The AMEI includes a floating mass transducer (FMT) that can be placed using two different surgical approaches: “oval window (OW) vibroplasty” and “round window (RW) vibroplasty.” The OW and RW are windows located on the cochlea. Normally, sound stimulus is transmitted from the middle ear to cochlea via the OW. RW vibroplasty has been suggested as an alternative method due to the difficulty of applying OW vibroplasty in patients with ossicle dysfunction. Several reports compare the advantages of each approach through pre and postoperative hearing tests. However, quantitatively assessing the treatment effect is challenging due to individual differences in pathologies. This study investigates the vibration transmission efficiency of each surgical approach using a finite-element model of the human cochlea. Vibration of the basilar membrane (BM) of the cochlea is simulated by applying the stimulus through the OW or RW. Pathological conditions, such as impaired stapes mobility, are simulated by increasing the stiffness of the stapedial annular ligament. RW closure due to chronic middle ear diseases is a common clinical occurrence and is simulated by increasing the stiffness of the RW membrane in the model. The results show that the vibration amplitude of the BM is larger when the stimulus is applied to the RW compared to the OW, except for cases of RW membrane ossification. The difference in these amplitudes is particularly significant when stapedial mobility is limited. These results suggest that RW vibroplasty would be advantageous, especially in cases of accompanying stapedial mobility impairment. Additionally, it is suggested that transitioning to OW vibroplasty could still ensure a sufficient level of vibratory transmission efficiency when placing the FMT on the RW membrane is difficult due to anatomical problems in the tympanic cavity or confirmed severe pathological conditions around the RW.
病理条件下主动中耳植入方法的有效性:基底膜振动模拟
有源中耳植入体(AMEI)能放大中耳的机械振动,并将其传送到耳蜗。有源中耳植入体(AMEI)包括一个浮动质量传感器(FMT),可通过两种不同的手术方法植入:"椭圆窗(OW)振动成形术 "和 "圆窗(RW)振动成形术"。椭圆窗和圆窗位于耳蜗上。正常情况下,声音刺激是通过椭圆窗从中耳传递到耳蜗的。由于在听小骨功能障碍的患者中很难应用OW振动成形术,因此有人建议将RW振动成形术作为一种替代方法。一些报告通过术前和术后听力测试比较了两种方法的优势。然而,由于病理的个体差异,定量评估治疗效果具有挑战性。本研究使用人类耳蜗的有限元模型研究了每种手术方法的振动传输效率。通过 OW 或 RW 施加刺激来模拟耳蜗基底膜(BM)的振动。通过增加镫骨环韧带的硬度来模拟镫骨活动度受损等病理情况。慢性中耳疾病导致的 RW 闭合是一种常见的临床现象,可通过增加模型中 RW 膜的硬度来模拟。结果表明,除了 RW 膜骨化的情况外,当刺激施加在 RW 上时,BM 的振动振幅比施加在 OW 上时要大。当镫骨活动受限时,这些振幅的差异尤其明显。这些结果表明,RW振动成形术是有优势的,尤其是在伴有镫骨活动障碍的情况下。此外,当由于鼓室的解剖问题或 RW 周围的严重病理情况而难以在 RW 膜上放置 FMT 时,过渡到 OW 振动成形术仍能确保足够的振动传输效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信