Verb Error Analysis of Thai EFL Generation Z and Generation Alpha Students in Thailand

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Yuki Takahashi, Narathip Thumawongsa
{"title":"Verb Error Analysis of Thai EFL Generation Z and Generation Alpha Students in Thailand","authors":"Yuki Takahashi, Narathip Thumawongsa","doi":"10.61508/refl.v31i2.274817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the shift in the teaching approaches employed in Thai English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom provides new opportunities and challenges to the teachers and students form Generation Z (1995 – 2009) and Generation Alpha (2010 – 2024). This study examines verb errors among Thai EFL learners from Generation Z and Generation Alpha to compare error types and sources. 300 written assignments from both generations were analyzed by Grammarly based on a mixed-methods approach adapted from Corder’s (1974). The findings showed that Generation Z produced 466 errors, considerably more than Generation Alpha's 355 errors, with both cohorts producing all types of errors, namely misformation, omission, addition, and misordering, respectively. Despite Generation Z producing higher overall error detection, Generation Alpha displayed higher rates of the certain error forms, such as misuse of singular and plural verb usage and expletive construction. Interlingual interference was the most frequently produced error source for both groups. These findings highlight the balance between L1 and L2 in EFL classrooms and the significance of teacher supervision in promoting autonomous learning. The study provides valuable insights for EFL teachers, suggesting appropriate teaching strategies in writing classes tailored to different generations.","PeriodicalId":36332,"journal":{"name":"rEFLections","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"rEFLections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v31i2.274817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, the shift in the teaching approaches employed in Thai English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom provides new opportunities and challenges to the teachers and students form Generation Z (1995 – 2009) and Generation Alpha (2010 – 2024). This study examines verb errors among Thai EFL learners from Generation Z and Generation Alpha to compare error types and sources. 300 written assignments from both generations were analyzed by Grammarly based on a mixed-methods approach adapted from Corder’s (1974). The findings showed that Generation Z produced 466 errors, considerably more than Generation Alpha's 355 errors, with both cohorts producing all types of errors, namely misformation, omission, addition, and misordering, respectively. Despite Generation Z producing higher overall error detection, Generation Alpha displayed higher rates of the certain error forms, such as misuse of singular and plural verb usage and expletive construction. Interlingual interference was the most frequently produced error source for both groups. These findings highlight the balance between L1 and L2 in EFL classrooms and the significance of teacher supervision in promoting autonomous learning. The study provides valuable insights for EFL teachers, suggesting appropriate teaching strategies in writing classes tailored to different generations.
泰国 EFL Z 世代和 Alpha 世代学生的动词错误分析
近年来,泰国英语作为外语(EFL)课堂教学方法的转变为 Z 世代(1995-2009 年)和 Alpha 世代(2010-2024 年)的教师和学生提供了新的机遇和挑战。本研究考察了 Z 世代和 Alpha 世代泰国 EFL 学习者的动词错误,以比较错误类型和来源。根据 Corder(1974 年)的混合方法,使用 Grammarly 对两代人的 300 份书面作业进行了分析。研究结果表明,Z 世代产生了 466 个错误,大大多于 Alpha 世代的 355 个错误,两代人分别产生了所有类型的错误,即错误格式、遗漏、添加和排序错误。尽管 Z 世代的总体错误检出率较高,但 Alpha 世代在某些错误形式上的检出率更高,如动词单复数用法和感叹词结构的误用。语际干扰是两个群体最常出现的错误来源。这些发现凸显了在 EFL 课堂上 L1 和 L2 之间的平衡,以及教师指导对促进自主学习的重要意义。这项研究为 EFL 教师提供了宝贵的见解,建议在写作课上针对不同年龄段的学生采取适当的教学策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
rEFLections
rEFLections Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信