Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Patients with Unilateral Retinal Vein Occlusion

Ahmad Hasan Khan Alizai, Dr. Yasir Ahmad, Dr. Fawad Ahmad, Dr. Tahira Afzal Khan, Dr. Muhammad Saad, Rabia Faheem
{"title":"Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Patients with Unilateral Retinal Vein Occlusion","authors":"Ahmad Hasan Khan Alizai, Dr. Yasir Ahmad, Dr. Fawad Ahmad, Dr. Tahira Afzal Khan, Dr. Muhammad Saad, Rabia Faheem","doi":"10.61919/jhrr.v4i3.1248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Retinal vein occlusion (RVO), including branch (BRVO) and central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), can lead to vision loss and optic nerve damage. Understanding changes in peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness in affected and fellow eyes is crucial for managing these conditions.\nObjective: This study evaluated longitudinal changes in pRNFL thickness in eyes with BRVO and CRVO, and their fellow eyes, compared with normal controls.\nMethods: In this retrospective case-control study, 68 patients with newly diagnosed unilateral RVO (42 BRVO, 26 CRVO) and 45 controls were included. pRNFL thickness was measured at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in six sectors. Baseline characteristics like age, gender, hypertension, and diabetes were recorded. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 23.0, with one-way ANOVA, Pearson’s chi-square test, paired t-tests, and repeated-measures ANOVA.\nResults: At baseline, BRVO-affected eyes had a global pRNFL thickness of 119.15 ± 17.71 μm, higher than fellow eyes at 104.52 ± 10.46 μm (p < 0.001). CRVO-affected eyes had a baseline pRNFL of 136.04 ± 36.33 μm, compared to 99.93 ± 13.59 μm in fellow eyes (p < 0.001). At 24 months, only the temporal sector in CRVO eyes showed significant pRNFL differences. Global pRNFL thickness in fellow eyes of both BRVO and CRVO groups decreased significantly at 24 months, with no significant change in the control group. Fellow eyes of the CRVO group had significantly lower pRNFL thickness at 12 and 24 months compared to BRVO and control groups.\nConclusion: Both BRVO and CRVO affect pRNFL thickness in fellow eyes, with CRVO showing more susceptibility to damage. This suggests a shared vascular abnormality between RVO and glaucoma, highlighting the importance of careful pRNFL monitoring, particularly in CRVO patients.","PeriodicalId":507812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i3.1248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Retinal vein occlusion (RVO), including branch (BRVO) and central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), can lead to vision loss and optic nerve damage. Understanding changes in peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness in affected and fellow eyes is crucial for managing these conditions. Objective: This study evaluated longitudinal changes in pRNFL thickness in eyes with BRVO and CRVO, and their fellow eyes, compared with normal controls. Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, 68 patients with newly diagnosed unilateral RVO (42 BRVO, 26 CRVO) and 45 controls were included. pRNFL thickness was measured at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in six sectors. Baseline characteristics like age, gender, hypertension, and diabetes were recorded. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 23.0, with one-way ANOVA, Pearson’s chi-square test, paired t-tests, and repeated-measures ANOVA. Results: At baseline, BRVO-affected eyes had a global pRNFL thickness of 119.15 ± 17.71 μm, higher than fellow eyes at 104.52 ± 10.46 μm (p < 0.001). CRVO-affected eyes had a baseline pRNFL of 136.04 ± 36.33 μm, compared to 99.93 ± 13.59 μm in fellow eyes (p < 0.001). At 24 months, only the temporal sector in CRVO eyes showed significant pRNFL differences. Global pRNFL thickness in fellow eyes of both BRVO and CRVO groups decreased significantly at 24 months, with no significant change in the control group. Fellow eyes of the CRVO group had significantly lower pRNFL thickness at 12 and 24 months compared to BRVO and control groups. Conclusion: Both BRVO and CRVO affect pRNFL thickness in fellow eyes, with CRVO showing more susceptibility to damage. This suggests a shared vascular abnormality between RVO and glaucoma, highlighting the importance of careful pRNFL monitoring, particularly in CRVO patients.
单侧视网膜静脉闭塞患者视网膜周围神经纤维层厚度
背景:视网膜静脉闭塞(RVO),包括视网膜分支静脉闭塞(BRVO)和视网膜中央静脉闭塞(CRVO),可导致视力下降和视神经损伤。了解受累眼和同侧眼视网膜周围神经纤维层(pRNFL)厚度的变化对于控制这些病症至关重要:本研究评估了与正常对照组相比,BRVO 和 CRVO 患者及其同侧眼的 pRNFL 厚度的纵向变化:在这项回顾性病例对照研究中,纳入了 68 名新确诊的单侧 RVO 患者(42 名 BRVO,26 名 CRVO)和 45 名对照者。研究人员还记录了年龄、性别、高血压和糖尿病等基线特征。统计分析采用 SPSS 23.0 进行,包括单因素方差分析、皮尔逊卡方检验、配对 t 检验和重复测量方差分析:基线时,BRVO 受影响眼睛的整体 pRNFL 厚度为 119.15 ± 17.71 μm,高于同侧眼睛的 104.52 ± 10.46 μm(p < 0.001)。受 CRVO 影响的眼睛的基线 pRNFL 为 136.04 ± 36.33 μm,而同侧眼睛为 99.93 ± 13.59 μm(p < 0.001)。在24个月时,只有CRVO眼的颞区pRNFL有显著差异。在 24 个月时,BRVO 组和 CRVO 组的同侧眼的整体 pRNFL 厚度均显著下降,而对照组则无明显变化。与BRVO组和对照组相比,CRVO组同侧眼的pRNFL厚度在12个月和24个月时明显较低:结论:BRVO 和 CRVO 都会影响同侧眼的 pRNFL 厚度,而 CRVO 更容易受到损害。这表明 RVO 和青光眼之间存在共同的血管异常,突出了仔细监测 pRNFL 的重要性,尤其是在 CRVO 患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信