Mixed reality simulation training in the assessment and management of acutely unwell patients in undergraduate medical education: a pilot study

Benjamin Rowlands, Natalie Cope, Dominic Proctor
{"title":"Mixed reality simulation training in the assessment and management of acutely unwell patients in undergraduate medical education: a pilot study","authors":"Benjamin Rowlands, Natalie Cope, Dominic Proctor","doi":"10.54531/tlan5397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:\n Development of the undergraduate simulation experience is needed to continue developing aspiring clinicians’ ability to assess and manage unwell patients. However, its heavy resource demand and ‘Generation Z’s’ desire for technologically enhanced learning means novel simulation modalities must now be considered. Mixed reality (MR) provides a platform to deliver such simulation; however, it is yet to be studied in this context. We conducted an observational cohort study with the aim to assess ift MR simulation improves students’ perceived ability to assess and manage unwell patients.\n Methods:\n We recruited 32 undergraduate medical students and asked them to rate their ability to assess and manage acutely unwell patients, out of 10. An MR simulation was then delivered using the Microsoft HoloLens and HoloScenario software produced by GigXR. Students then rated their assessment and management ability again, alongside their experience of the system and its usability. Data analysis used paired t-tests to assess for significant differences.\n Results:\n By attending the simulation, students showed a significant improvement in perceived ability to assess (p < 0.001) and manage (p < 0.001) acutely unwell patients. Mean assessment scores improved by 1.09/10 (95% confidence interval [CI 0.67, 1.52]) with 89% of students feeling more confident. Mean management scores improved by 1.63/10 (95% CI [1.15, 2.10]) with 84% of students reporting increased confidence levels. When considering usability, 69% of students did not find the MR system easy to use, with 75% of students having technical issues and 38% experiencing side effects. Overall, 88% of students believed the experience was beneficial to their learning.\n Conclusions:\n MR shows promise in its ability to deliver simulation training and improve students’ perceived ability to assess and manage unwell patients. Advances in software availability and content are required for integration into undergraduate medical curricula. Further research is required to assess if these results are replicated objectively.","PeriodicalId":506634,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Healthcare Simulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Healthcare Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54531/tlan5397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Development of the undergraduate simulation experience is needed to continue developing aspiring clinicians’ ability to assess and manage unwell patients. However, its heavy resource demand and ‘Generation Z’s’ desire for technologically enhanced learning means novel simulation modalities must now be considered. Mixed reality (MR) provides a platform to deliver such simulation; however, it is yet to be studied in this context. We conducted an observational cohort study with the aim to assess ift MR simulation improves students’ perceived ability to assess and manage unwell patients. Methods: We recruited 32 undergraduate medical students and asked them to rate their ability to assess and manage acutely unwell patients, out of 10. An MR simulation was then delivered using the Microsoft HoloLens and HoloScenario software produced by GigXR. Students then rated their assessment and management ability again, alongside their experience of the system and its usability. Data analysis used paired t-tests to assess for significant differences. Results: By attending the simulation, students showed a significant improvement in perceived ability to assess (p < 0.001) and manage (p < 0.001) acutely unwell patients. Mean assessment scores improved by 1.09/10 (95% confidence interval [CI 0.67, 1.52]) with 89% of students feeling more confident. Mean management scores improved by 1.63/10 (95% CI [1.15, 2.10]) with 84% of students reporting increased confidence levels. When considering usability, 69% of students did not find the MR system easy to use, with 75% of students having technical issues and 38% experiencing side effects. Overall, 88% of students believed the experience was beneficial to their learning. Conclusions: MR shows promise in its ability to deliver simulation training and improve students’ perceived ability to assess and manage unwell patients. Advances in software availability and content are required for integration into undergraduate medical curricula. Further research is required to assess if these results are replicated objectively.
医学本科教育中评估和管理急性病患者的混合现实模拟训练:一项试点研究
背景:要继续培养有抱负的临床医生评估和管理不适病人的能力,就必须发展本科生模拟体验。然而,对资源的大量需求以及 "Z 世代 "对技术强化学习的渴望意味着现在必须考虑新的模拟模式。混合现实(MR)提供了一个提供此类模拟的平台;然而,在这种情况下,它尚未得到研究。我们开展了一项观察性队列研究,旨在评估 MR 模拟是否能提高学生评估和管理不适患者的感知能力。研究方法我们招募了 32 名医学本科生,要求他们对自己评估和管理急性不适患者的能力进行评分(满分为 10 分)。然后使用微软 HoloLens 和 GigXR 开发的 HoloScenario 软件进行磁共振模拟。然后,学生们再次对自己的评估和管理能力以及对系统的体验和可用性进行评分。数据分析采用配对 t 检验来评估是否存在显著差异。结果通过参加模拟训练,学生们评估(p < 0.001)和管理(p < 0.001)急性病患者的能力有了显著提高。平均评估分数提高了 1.09/10(95% 置信区间 [CI 0.67, 1.52]),89% 的学生感到更有信心。平均管理得分提高了 1.63/10(95% 置信区间 [1.15,2.10]),84% 的学生表示信心水平有所提高。在考虑可用性时,69% 的学生认为 MR 系统不容易使用,75% 的学生遇到技术问题,38% 的学生遇到副作用。总体而言,88% 的学生认为这种体验有利于他们的学习。结论:磁共振系统在提供模拟训练、提高学生评估和管理不适病人的能力方面大有可为。要将其纳入医学本科课程,需要在软件可用性和内容方面取得进展。还需要进一步的研究来评估这些结果是否可以客观地复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信