Household Air Pollution Disparities Between Socioeconomic Groups in Chicago

W. I. Krakowka, Jiajun Luo, Andrew Craver, Jayant Pinto, Habibul Ahsan, Christopher O. Olopade, B. Aschebrook-Kilfoy
{"title":"Household Air Pollution Disparities Between Socioeconomic Groups in Chicago","authors":"W. I. Krakowka, Jiajun Luo, Andrew Craver, Jayant Pinto, Habibul Ahsan, Christopher O. Olopade, B. Aschebrook-Kilfoy","doi":"10.1088/2515-7620/ad6d3f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Abstract Purpose: To assess indoor air pollution levels in urban US households and examine how socioeconomic factors influence these levels. Methods: We deployed wireless air monitoring devices to 244 households in a diverse population in Chicago to continuously record indoor fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentration. We calculated hourly average PM2.5 concentration in a 24-hour cycle. Four factors – race, household income, area deprivation, and exposure to smoking – were considered in this study. Results: A total of 93085 hours of exposure data were recorded. The average indoor PM2.5 concentration was 43.8 μg/m3. We observed a significant difference in the average indoor PM2.5 concentrations between Black/African American and non-Black/African American households (46.3 vs. 31.6 μg/m3), between high-income and low-income households (18.2 vs. 52.5 μg/m3), and between smoking and non-smoking households (69.7 vs. 29.0 μg/m3). However, no significant difference was observed between households in less and more deprived areas (43.7 vs. 43.0 μg/m3). Implications: Indoor air pollution levels in Chicago households are much higher than the recommended level, challenging the hypothesis that indoor air quality is adequate for populations in high income nations. Our results indicate that it is the personal characteristics of participants, rather than the macro environments, that lead to observed differences in household air pollution. Keywords: PM, pollution, exposure, urbanicity, indoor environment","PeriodicalId":505267,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research Communications","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad6d3f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: To assess indoor air pollution levels in urban US households and examine how socioeconomic factors influence these levels. Methods: We deployed wireless air monitoring devices to 244 households in a diverse population in Chicago to continuously record indoor fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentration. We calculated hourly average PM2.5 concentration in a 24-hour cycle. Four factors – race, household income, area deprivation, and exposure to smoking – were considered in this study. Results: A total of 93085 hours of exposure data were recorded. The average indoor PM2.5 concentration was 43.8 μg/m3. We observed a significant difference in the average indoor PM2.5 concentrations between Black/African American and non-Black/African American households (46.3 vs. 31.6 μg/m3), between high-income and low-income households (18.2 vs. 52.5 μg/m3), and between smoking and non-smoking households (69.7 vs. 29.0 μg/m3). However, no significant difference was observed between households in less and more deprived areas (43.7 vs. 43.0 μg/m3). Implications: Indoor air pollution levels in Chicago households are much higher than the recommended level, challenging the hypothesis that indoor air quality is adequate for populations in high income nations. Our results indicate that it is the personal characteristics of participants, rather than the macro environments, that lead to observed differences in household air pollution. Keywords: PM, pollution, exposure, urbanicity, indoor environment
芝加哥不同社会经济群体之间的家庭空气污染差异
摘要 目的:评估美国城市家庭的室内空气污染水平,并研究社会经济因素如何影响这些水平。方法:我们在芝加哥不同人群的 244 个家庭中安装了无线空气监测设备,连续记录室内空气污染水平:我们在芝加哥不同人群的 244 个家庭中安装了无线空气监测装置,以连续记录室内细颗粒物(PM2.5)的浓度。我们以 24 小时为周期计算每小时的 PM2.5 平均浓度。本研究考虑了种族、家庭收入、地区贫困程度和是否吸烟这四个因素。研究结果共记录了 93085 小时的暴露数据。室内 PM2.5 平均浓度为 43.8 微克/立方米。我们观察到,黑人/非裔美国人家庭与非黑人/非裔美国人家庭之间(46.3 vs. 31.6 μg/m3)、高收入家庭与低收入家庭之间(18.2 vs. 52.5 μg/m3)以及吸烟家庭与非吸烟家庭之间(69.7 vs. 29.0 μg/m3)的室内 PM2.5 平均浓度存在明显差异。然而,在较贫困地区和较贫困地区的家庭之间(43.7 vs. 43.0 μg/m3)没有观察到明显的差异。影响:芝加哥家庭的室内空气污染水平远高于建议水平,这对 "室内空气质量足以满足高收入国家人口需求 "的假设提出了质疑。我们的研究结果表明,是参与者的个人特征而非宏观环境导致了观察到的家庭空气污染差异。关键词可吸入颗粒物、污染、暴露、城市化、室内环境
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信