Well-being balance and lived experiences assessment: a valid, comprehensive measure of positive well-being

Ashley F. McDermott, Christopher R. Brydges, Troy Norris
{"title":"Well-being balance and lived experiences assessment: a valid, comprehensive measure of positive well-being","authors":"Ashley F. McDermott, Christopher R. Brydges, Troy Norris","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1396543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Widely used measures of self-reported subjective well-being and flourishing generally do not directly measure positive experiences that have been demonstrated to improve subjective well-being and flourishing, which could aid in developing personalized interventions to improve individuals’ well-being. The present study evaluated the validity of the Well-being Balance and Lived Experience (WBAL) Model and Assessment, a new model of well-being and corresponding assessment instrument that evaluates the self-reported frequency of positive experiences and positive feelings of well-being, balanced across activation and arousal levels.A total of 496 evaluable subjects completed the WBAL Assessment, the PERMA+ Profiler (PERMA+) and the Well-Being Assessment Adult 24-item (WBA-24). A confirmatory factor model corresponding to the WBAL construct was created, and internal and external validity of the WBAL Assessment were interrogated.The confirmatory factor model showed good fit, indicating that each of the model factors are related but distinct and all items load significantly onto their factors. The WBAL Assessment demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.95) and internal validity across well-being factors and Feelings (r = 0.96) and Experiences (r = 0.94) domains. The WBAL Assessment demonstrated strong convergent validity in comparison to PERMA+ (r = 0.80) and WBA-24 (r = 0.75), indicating that the WBAL Assessment measures a similar overall concept of well-being and flourishing. Discriminant validity of WBAL factors was demonstrated for an average of 14.3 of 17 comparator domains. The main differences between instruments are WBAL’s assessment of positive Experiences, the comparator instruments’ inclusion of feelings with negative valence, and WBA-24’s inclusion of financial stability.The WBAL Assessment is a reliable and valid instrument to comprehensively measure positive aspects of well-being that evaluates multiple modifiable contributors to individuals’ well-being to guide design of personalized assessment and intervention programs to enhance positive well-being.","PeriodicalId":507929,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"9 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1396543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Widely used measures of self-reported subjective well-being and flourishing generally do not directly measure positive experiences that have been demonstrated to improve subjective well-being and flourishing, which could aid in developing personalized interventions to improve individuals’ well-being. The present study evaluated the validity of the Well-being Balance and Lived Experience (WBAL) Model and Assessment, a new model of well-being and corresponding assessment instrument that evaluates the self-reported frequency of positive experiences and positive feelings of well-being, balanced across activation and arousal levels.A total of 496 evaluable subjects completed the WBAL Assessment, the PERMA+ Profiler (PERMA+) and the Well-Being Assessment Adult 24-item (WBA-24). A confirmatory factor model corresponding to the WBAL construct was created, and internal and external validity of the WBAL Assessment were interrogated.The confirmatory factor model showed good fit, indicating that each of the model factors are related but distinct and all items load significantly onto their factors. The WBAL Assessment demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.95) and internal validity across well-being factors and Feelings (r = 0.96) and Experiences (r = 0.94) domains. The WBAL Assessment demonstrated strong convergent validity in comparison to PERMA+ (r = 0.80) and WBA-24 (r = 0.75), indicating that the WBAL Assessment measures a similar overall concept of well-being and flourishing. Discriminant validity of WBAL factors was demonstrated for an average of 14.3 of 17 comparator domains. The main differences between instruments are WBAL’s assessment of positive Experiences, the comparator instruments’ inclusion of feelings with negative valence, and WBA-24’s inclusion of financial stability.The WBAL Assessment is a reliable and valid instrument to comprehensively measure positive aspects of well-being that evaluates multiple modifiable contributors to individuals’ well-being to guide design of personalized assessment and intervention programs to enhance positive well-being.
幸福平衡和生活经历评估:积极幸福的有效、全面衡量标准
广泛使用的自我报告主观幸福感和兴旺程度的测量方法通常不能直接测量积极体验,而积极体验已被证明可以改善主观幸福感和兴旺程度,这有助于制定个性化干预措施来改善个人的幸福感。本研究评估了幸福感平衡与生活体验(WBAL)模型和评估的有效性,这是一种新的幸福感模型和相应的评估工具,用于评估自我报告的积极体验和积极幸福感的频率,并在不同的激活和唤醒水平之间保持平衡。我们建立了一个与 WBAL 构建相对应的确认性因子模型,并对 WBAL 评估的内部和外部有效性进行了检验。确认性因子模型显示出良好的拟合度,表明模型中的每个因子都相互关联但又各不相同,而且所有项目在其因子上都有显著的负荷。WBAL 评估在幸福感因子、感觉(r = 0.96)和体验(r = 0.94)领域之间表现出较高的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.95)和内部有效性。与PERMA+(r = 0.80)和WBA-24(r = 0.75)相比,WBAL评估表现出很强的收敛效度,这表明WBAL评估测量的幸福感和蓬勃发展的整体概念相似。在 17 个比较领域中,平均有 14.3 个领域证明了 WBAL 各因素的区分有效性。WBAL评估是一种可靠有效的工具,可全面测量幸福感的积极方面,评估个人幸福感的多种可调节因素,以指导设计个性化评估和干预方案,提高积极的幸福感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信