A feasibility randomized controlled trial of a community-level physical activity strategy for older adults with motoric cognitive risk syndrome

Shannon M. Hernon, Yashi Singh, Nathan Ward, Arthur F. Kramer, Thomas G. Travison, Joe Verghese, Roger A. Fielding, C. Kowaleski, Kieran F. Reid
{"title":"A feasibility randomized controlled trial of a community-level physical activity strategy for older adults with motoric cognitive risk syndrome","authors":"Shannon M. Hernon, Yashi Singh, Nathan Ward, Arthur F. Kramer, Thomas G. Travison, Joe Verghese, Roger A. Fielding, C. Kowaleski, Kieran F. Reid","doi":"10.3389/fragi.2024.1329177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) is a syndrome characterized by subjective memory complaints and slow walking speeds that can identify older adults at increased risk for developing Alzheimer’s disease or a related dementia (ADRD). To date, the feasibility of community-based physical activity (PA) programs for improving outcomes in MCR have yet to be examined. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a translational randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing 24-weeks of PA to a healthy aging education (HE) control intervention delivered within the infrastructure of an urban senior center in Greater Boston (clincaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03750682). An existing senior center employee was trained to administer the multimodal group-based PA program that included moderate-intensity aerobic walking, strength, flexibility and balance training. A total of 79 older adults attended the senior center for a screening visit, of whom 29 met the MCR criteria and 25 were randomized to PA or HE (mean age: 74.4 ± 7 years; BMI: 32.4 ± 7 kg/m2; 85% female; 3MSE score: 92.4 ± 7; gait speed: 0.52 ± 0.1 m/s; SPPB score 4.8 ± 1.9). Due to the Covid-19 pandemic the study was stopped prematurely. Participants could successfully adhere to the study interventions (overall attendance rate: PA: 69% vs. HE:70% at study termination). Participants also successfully completed baseline and follow-up study assessments that included a computerized cognitive testing battery and objective tests of physical performance and functional exercise capacity. No study-related adverse events occurred. Notable trends for improved cognitive performance, gait speed and 6-min walk distance were exhibited in PA compared to HE. Our study provides important preliminary information to aid the design of larger-scale RCTs of PA that may help to preserve the independence of vulnerable older adults at high risk for ADRD in community-based settings.","PeriodicalId":505028,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Aging","volume":"8 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2024.1329177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) is a syndrome characterized by subjective memory complaints and slow walking speeds that can identify older adults at increased risk for developing Alzheimer’s disease or a related dementia (ADRD). To date, the feasibility of community-based physical activity (PA) programs for improving outcomes in MCR have yet to be examined. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a translational randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing 24-weeks of PA to a healthy aging education (HE) control intervention delivered within the infrastructure of an urban senior center in Greater Boston (clincaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03750682). An existing senior center employee was trained to administer the multimodal group-based PA program that included moderate-intensity aerobic walking, strength, flexibility and balance training. A total of 79 older adults attended the senior center for a screening visit, of whom 29 met the MCR criteria and 25 were randomized to PA or HE (mean age: 74.4 ± 7 years; BMI: 32.4 ± 7 kg/m2; 85% female; 3MSE score: 92.4 ± 7; gait speed: 0.52 ± 0.1 m/s; SPPB score 4.8 ± 1.9). Due to the Covid-19 pandemic the study was stopped prematurely. Participants could successfully adhere to the study interventions (overall attendance rate: PA: 69% vs. HE:70% at study termination). Participants also successfully completed baseline and follow-up study assessments that included a computerized cognitive testing battery and objective tests of physical performance and functional exercise capacity. No study-related adverse events occurred. Notable trends for improved cognitive performance, gait speed and 6-min walk distance were exhibited in PA compared to HE. Our study provides important preliminary information to aid the design of larger-scale RCTs of PA that may help to preserve the independence of vulnerable older adults at high risk for ADRD in community-based settings.
针对患有运动性认知风险综合征的老年人的社区体育活动策略可行性随机对照试验
运动性认知风险综合征(MCR)是一种以主观记忆抱怨和行走速度缓慢为特征的综合征,可识别出罹患阿尔茨海默病或相关痴呆症(ADRD)风险较高的老年人。迄今为止,以社区为基础的体育锻炼(PA)计划在改善 MCR 症状方面的可行性尚未得到研究。为了填补这一知识空白,我们开展了一项转化随机对照试验(RCT),比较了在大波士顿地区城市老年中心的基础设施内开展的为期 24 周的体育锻炼与健康老龄化教育(HE)对照干预(clincaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT03750682)。老年中心的一名现有员工接受了培训,以管理多模式的集体老有所事项目,其中包括中等强度的有氧步行、力量、柔韧性和平衡训练。共有 79 名老年人到老年中心进行筛查,其中 29 人符合 MCR 标准,25 人被随机分配到 PA 或 HE(平均年龄:74.4 ± 7 岁;体重指数:32.4 ± 7 kg/m2;85% 为女性;3MSE 分数:92.4 ± 7;步速:0.52 ± 0.1 m/s;SPPB 分数:4.8 ± 1.9)。由于 Covid-19 大流行,研究提前结束。参与者成功地坚持了研究干预(总体出勤率:PA:69%,HE:70%)。参与者还顺利完成了基线和后续研究评估,其中包括计算机化认知测试、体能和功能锻炼能力客观测试。没有发生与研究相关的不良事件。与 HE 相比,PA 在认知能力、步态速度和 6 分钟步行距离方面都有明显的改善趋势。我们的研究提供了重要的初步信息,有助于设计更大规模的PA RCT,这可能有助于在社区环境中保护ADRD高风险老年人的独立性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信