Land Management and Adoption of Biodiversity Conservation Approaches

Kossivi Fabrice Dossa, Y. Miassi
{"title":"Land Management and Adoption of Biodiversity Conservation Approaches","authors":"Kossivi Fabrice Dossa, Y. Miassi","doi":"10.54536/ajec.v3i2.3138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Generally, proposed areas for restoring the environment are growing in number, as are biodiversity conservation efforts in affluent nations. However, the fragmented ownership structure and management of lands, the multitude of landowners, and their diverse characteristics can present substantial obstacles to conservation endeavors. Consequently, attitudes toward conservation initiatives among landowners can vary widely, with some initiatives facing resistance while others garner consent and active participation. The study aims to systematize recent literature (2015–2024), gain knowledge of the context, and explore the social impacts of biodiversity conservation projects on land management. Globally, there is a scarcity of research aiming to establish overarching patterns. The PRISMA approach was used to conduct a rigorous publication evaluation for the current investigation. Finally, 25 identified articles were included in the study to systematize recent literature (2015–2024). To address this void, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the material of biodiversity conservation practices on private and public lands, aiming to construct a comprehensive framework of elements impacting the nod of approval of biodiversity conservation efforts on these lands. Our findings indicate that while conservation bodies, especially governmental bodies or non-governmental organizations (NGOs), have limited authority over individual landowners, they can enhance the adoption and perception of biodiversity conservation initiatives on land management by enhancing social communications. We developed four major recommended programs to assist in the development and implementation of biodiversity preservation programs for individuals and governments, as well as to identify actionable strategies for enhancing the social acceptance of such initiatives.","PeriodicalId":475790,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Environment and Climate","volume":"23 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Environment and Climate","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54536/ajec.v3i2.3138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generally, proposed areas for restoring the environment are growing in number, as are biodiversity conservation efforts in affluent nations. However, the fragmented ownership structure and management of lands, the multitude of landowners, and their diverse characteristics can present substantial obstacles to conservation endeavors. Consequently, attitudes toward conservation initiatives among landowners can vary widely, with some initiatives facing resistance while others garner consent and active participation. The study aims to systematize recent literature (2015–2024), gain knowledge of the context, and explore the social impacts of biodiversity conservation projects on land management. Globally, there is a scarcity of research aiming to establish overarching patterns. The PRISMA approach was used to conduct a rigorous publication evaluation for the current investigation. Finally, 25 identified articles were included in the study to systematize recent literature (2015–2024). To address this void, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the material of biodiversity conservation practices on private and public lands, aiming to construct a comprehensive framework of elements impacting the nod of approval of biodiversity conservation efforts on these lands. Our findings indicate that while conservation bodies, especially governmental bodies or non-governmental organizations (NGOs), have limited authority over individual landowners, they can enhance the adoption and perception of biodiversity conservation initiatives on land management by enhancing social communications. We developed four major recommended programs to assist in the development and implementation of biodiversity preservation programs for individuals and governments, as well as to identify actionable strategies for enhancing the social acceptance of such initiatives.
土地管理和采用生物多样性保护方法
一般来说,建议恢复环境的地区越来越多,富裕国家的生物多样性保护工作也越来越多。然而,分散的土地所有权结构和管理、众多的土地所有者以及他们各不相同的特点,都会给保护工作带来巨大障碍。因此,土地所有者对保护措施的态度也大相径庭,有些措施会遭到抵制,而有些措施则会得到同意和积极参与。本研究旨在系统整理近期(2015-2024 年)的文献,了解相关背景,并探讨生物多样性保护项目对土地管理的社会影响。在全球范围内,旨在建立总体模式的研究很少。本次调查采用了 PRISMA 方法进行严格的出版物评估。最后,25 篇已确定的文章被纳入研究,以系统整理近期(2015-2024 年)的文献。为了填补这一空白,我们对私人和公共土地上的生物多样性保护措施的材料进行了全面评估,旨在构建一个影响这些土地上生物多样性保护工作的点头批准要素的综合框架。我们的研究结果表明,虽然保护机构,尤其是政府机构或非政府组织(NGO)对个体土地所有者的权力有限,但他们可以通过加强社会沟通来提高土地管理中生物多样性保护措施的采纳率和认知度。我们制定了四个主要的建议方案,以协助个人和政府制定和实施生物多样性保护计划,并确定可操作的战略,提高社会对此类倡议的接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信