Cost-effectiveness in an interprofessional training ward within a university department for internal medicine: a monocentric open-label controlled study of the A-STAR Regensburg

Sophie Schlosser-Hupf, E. Aichner, Marcus Meier, Sheila Albaladejo-Fuertes, Anna Mahnke, Kirstin Ruttmann, Sophia Rusch, Bernhard Michels, A. Mehrl, C. Kunst, Stephan Schmid, Martina Müller
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness in an interprofessional training ward within a university department for internal medicine: a monocentric open-label controlled study of the A-STAR Regensburg","authors":"Sophie Schlosser-Hupf, E. Aichner, Marcus Meier, Sheila Albaladejo-Fuertes, Anna Mahnke, Kirstin Ruttmann, Sophia Rusch, Bernhard Michels, A. Mehrl, C. Kunst, Stephan Schmid, Martina Müller","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1340953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interprofessional collaboration in healthcare involves diverse professionals working together to address complex patient needs. Interprofessional training wards offer workplace-based interprofessional education in real healthcare settings, fostering collaborative learning among students. While their educational value is widely recognized, debates persist regarding their cost-effectiveness due to limited research. This study assesses the cost efficiency of the interprofessional training ward Regensburg (A-STAR) within the Department of Internal Medicine I at the University Hospital Regensburg, compared to conventional wards.From October 2019 to December 2022, 7,244 patient cases were assigned to A-STAR or conventional wards by case managers, with a comprehensive analysis of all associated revenues and costs.A-STAR treated 1,482 patients, whereas conventional wards treated 5,752 patients, with more males and younger patients at A-STAR. A-STAR achieved higher profit per case (€1,508.74) attributed to increased revenues and reduced material costs. It generated an average of €1,366.54 more Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) revenue per case annually than conventional wards, due to greater medical complexity reflected in a higher case-mix index (CMI: 2.4 vs. 2.2). The increased case complexity led to longer patient stays (9.0 vs. 8.1 days) and fewer cases treated annually at A-STAR (27.4 cases/year vs. 37.8 cases/year). The higher CMI did not result in a higher proportion of patients requiring isolation. A-STAR exhibited a higher capacity utilization rate (87.1% vs. 83.9%). Personnel costs per case at A-STAR were initially elevated due to enhanced observation by the senior physician but were gradually mitigated by expanding A-STAR’s bed capacity. Material costs were consistently lower on a per-case basis at A-STAR (€1512.02 vs. €1577.12), particularly in terms of medication expenses, indicating more resource-efficient operations. From the A-STAR graduates, 18 individuals were recruited for permanent positions as doctors or nurses over 2 years.A-STAR demonstrates economic efficiency and stability even during the COVID-19 pandemic. The substantial personnel acquisition is likely influenced by high levels of satisfaction with education and work and is economically relevant in medical staff shortages. These findings provide a compelling rationale for the broader implementation of interprofessional training wards, establishing them as vital platforms for nurturing future professionals.","PeriodicalId":510753,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"13 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1340953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interprofessional collaboration in healthcare involves diverse professionals working together to address complex patient needs. Interprofessional training wards offer workplace-based interprofessional education in real healthcare settings, fostering collaborative learning among students. While their educational value is widely recognized, debates persist regarding their cost-effectiveness due to limited research. This study assesses the cost efficiency of the interprofessional training ward Regensburg (A-STAR) within the Department of Internal Medicine I at the University Hospital Regensburg, compared to conventional wards.From October 2019 to December 2022, 7,244 patient cases were assigned to A-STAR or conventional wards by case managers, with a comprehensive analysis of all associated revenues and costs.A-STAR treated 1,482 patients, whereas conventional wards treated 5,752 patients, with more males and younger patients at A-STAR. A-STAR achieved higher profit per case (€1,508.74) attributed to increased revenues and reduced material costs. It generated an average of €1,366.54 more Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) revenue per case annually than conventional wards, due to greater medical complexity reflected in a higher case-mix index (CMI: 2.4 vs. 2.2). The increased case complexity led to longer patient stays (9.0 vs. 8.1 days) and fewer cases treated annually at A-STAR (27.4 cases/year vs. 37.8 cases/year). The higher CMI did not result in a higher proportion of patients requiring isolation. A-STAR exhibited a higher capacity utilization rate (87.1% vs. 83.9%). Personnel costs per case at A-STAR were initially elevated due to enhanced observation by the senior physician but were gradually mitigated by expanding A-STAR’s bed capacity. Material costs were consistently lower on a per-case basis at A-STAR (€1512.02 vs. €1577.12), particularly in terms of medication expenses, indicating more resource-efficient operations. From the A-STAR graduates, 18 individuals were recruited for permanent positions as doctors or nurses over 2 years.A-STAR demonstrates economic efficiency and stability even during the COVID-19 pandemic. The substantial personnel acquisition is likely influenced by high levels of satisfaction with education and work and is economically relevant in medical staff shortages. These findings provide a compelling rationale for the broader implementation of interprofessional training wards, establishing them as vital platforms for nurturing future professionals.
大学内科系跨专业培训病房的成本效益:雷根斯堡 A-STAR 单中心开放标签对照研究
医疗保健领域的跨专业合作涉及不同专业人员的合作,以满足复杂的患者需求。跨专业培训病房在真实的医疗环境中提供基于工作场所的跨专业教育,促进学生之间的协作学习。虽然其教育价值已得到广泛认可,但由于研究有限,关于其成本效益的争论一直存在。从2019年10月到2022年12月,病例管理人员将7244个病例分配给A-STAR或传统病房,并对所有相关收入和成本进行了综合分析。A-STAR治疗了1482名患者,而传统病房治疗了5752名患者,其中A-STAR治疗的患者中男性和年轻患者较多。由于收入增加和材料成本降低,A-STAR 每个病例的利润更高(1,508.74 欧元)。由于病例组合指数(CMI:2.4 对 2.2)更高,反映了更高的医疗复杂性,与传统病房相比,A-STAR 平均每个病例每年多收入 1366.54 欧元。病例复杂性的增加导致病人住院时间延长(9.0 天对 8.1 天),A-STAR 每年治疗的病例减少(27.4 例/年对 37.8 例/年)。较高的 CMI 并未导致需要隔离的患者比例增加。A-STAR 的医疗能力利用率更高(87.1% 对 83.9%)。由于高级医师加强了观察,A-STAR 每个病例的人事成本最初有所上升,但随着 A-STAR 床位数的增加而逐渐降低。在 A-STAR,每个病例的材料成本一直较低(1512.02 欧元对 1577.12 欧元),特别是在药物支出方面,这表明运营更加节约资源。即使在 COVID-19 大流行期间,A-STAR 也表现出了经济效益和稳定性。即使在 COVID-19 大流行期间,A-STAR 也表现出了经济效益和稳定性。大量人员被录用可能是受教育和工作满意度高的影响,在医务人员短缺的情况下也具有经济意义。这些发现为更广泛地实施跨专业培训病房提供了令人信服的理由,使其成为培养未来专业人员的重要平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信