Within-hospital Temporal Clustering of Postoperative Complications and Implications for Safety Monitoring and Benchmarking Using ACS-NSQIP Data

Mark E. Cohen, Yaoming Liu, Clifford Y. Ko, Bruce L. Hall
{"title":"Within-hospital Temporal Clustering of Postoperative Complications and Implications for Safety Monitoring and Benchmarking Using ACS-NSQIP Data","authors":"Mark E. Cohen, Yaoming Liu, Clifford Y. Ko, Bruce L. Hall","doi":"10.1097/as9.0000000000000483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n To determine the extent to which within-hospital temporal clustering of postoperative complications is observed in the American College of Surgeons, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP).\n \n \n \n ACS-NSQIP relies on periodic and on-demand reports for quality benchmarking. However, if rapid increases in postoperative complication rates (clusters) are common, other reporting methods might be valuable additions to the program. This article focuses on estimating the incidence of within-hospital temporal clusters.\n \n \n \n ACS-NSQIP data from 1,547,440 patients, in 425 hospitals, over a 2-year period was examined. Hospital-specific Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the incidence of mortality, morbidity, and surgical site infection (SSI) over a 30-day postoperative period, with risk adjustment for patient and procedure and with additional adjustments for linear trend, day-of-week, and season. Clusters were identified using scan statistics, and cluster counts were compared, using unpaired and paired t tests, for different levels of adjustment and when randomization of cases across time eliminated all temporal influences.\n \n \n \n Temporal clusters were rarely observed. When clustering was adjusted only for patient and procedure risk, an annual average of 0.31, 0.85, and 0.51 clusters were observed per hospital for mortality, morbidity, and SSI, respectively. The number of clusters dropped after adjustment for linear trend, day-of-week, and season (0.31–0.24; P = 0.012; 0.85–0.80; P = 0.034; and 0.51–0.36; P < 0.001; using paired t tests) for mortality, morbidity, and SSI, respectively. There was 1 significant difference in the number of clusters when comparing data with all adjustments and after data were randomized (0.24 and 0.25 for mortality; P = 0.853; 0.80 and 0.82 for morbidity; P = 0.529; and 0.36 and 0.46 [randomized data had more clusters] for SSI; P = 0.001; using paired t tests) for mortality, morbidity, and SSI, respectively.\n \n \n \n Temporal clusters of postoperative complications were rarely observed in ACS-NSQIP data. The described methodology may be useful in assessing clustering in other surgical arenas.\n","PeriodicalId":503165,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgery Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To determine the extent to which within-hospital temporal clustering of postoperative complications is observed in the American College of Surgeons, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). ACS-NSQIP relies on periodic and on-demand reports for quality benchmarking. However, if rapid increases in postoperative complication rates (clusters) are common, other reporting methods might be valuable additions to the program. This article focuses on estimating the incidence of within-hospital temporal clusters. ACS-NSQIP data from 1,547,440 patients, in 425 hospitals, over a 2-year period was examined. Hospital-specific Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the incidence of mortality, morbidity, and surgical site infection (SSI) over a 30-day postoperative period, with risk adjustment for patient and procedure and with additional adjustments for linear trend, day-of-week, and season. Clusters were identified using scan statistics, and cluster counts were compared, using unpaired and paired t tests, for different levels of adjustment and when randomization of cases across time eliminated all temporal influences. Temporal clusters were rarely observed. When clustering was adjusted only for patient and procedure risk, an annual average of 0.31, 0.85, and 0.51 clusters were observed per hospital for mortality, morbidity, and SSI, respectively. The number of clusters dropped after adjustment for linear trend, day-of-week, and season (0.31–0.24; P = 0.012; 0.85–0.80; P = 0.034; and 0.51–0.36; P < 0.001; using paired t tests) for mortality, morbidity, and SSI, respectively. There was 1 significant difference in the number of clusters when comparing data with all adjustments and after data were randomized (0.24 and 0.25 for mortality; P = 0.853; 0.80 and 0.82 for morbidity; P = 0.529; and 0.36 and 0.46 [randomized data had more clusters] for SSI; P = 0.001; using paired t tests) for mortality, morbidity, and SSI, respectively. Temporal clusters of postoperative complications were rarely observed in ACS-NSQIP data. The described methodology may be useful in assessing clustering in other surgical arenas.
利用 ACS-NSQIP 数据进行医院内术后并发症的时间聚类及其对安全监控和基准设定的影响
确定在美国外科医生学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)中观察到的医院内术后并发症的时间聚集程度。 ACS-NSQIP 依靠定期和按需报告来制定质量基准。然而,如果术后并发症发生率(群)的快速增长很常见,那么其他报告方法可能会成为该计划的重要补充。本文的重点是估算院内时间集群的发生率。 我们研究了 425 家医院的 1547,440 名患者在两年内的 ACS-NSQIP 数据。采用医院特异性 Cox 比例危险回归估算了术后 30 天内的死亡率、发病率和手术部位感染 (SSI) 发生率,并对患者和手术进行了风险调整,还对线性趋势、周日和季节进行了额外调整。采用扫描统计法识别群集,并采用非配对和配对 t 检验法比较不同调整水平下的群集计数,以及在消除所有时间影响因素的情况下对不同时间的病例进行随机化处理的群集计数。 很少观察到时间聚类。当仅根据患者和手术风险进行聚类调整时,每家医院的死亡率、发病率和 SSI 年平均聚类分别为 0.31、0.85 和 0.51。在对死亡率、发病率和 SSI 的线性趋势、周日和季节进行调整后,群组数量分别下降了(0.31-0.24;P = 0.012;0.85-0.80;P = 0.034;0.51-0.36;P < 0.001;使用配对 t 检验)。在死亡率、发病率和 SSI 方面,将所有调整后的数据与随机化后的数据进行比较时,组群数有 1 个显著差异(死亡率为 0.24 和 0.25;P = 0.853;发病率为 0.80 和 0.82;P = 0.529;SSI 为 0.36 和 0.46 [随机化数据有更多组群];P = 0.001;采用配对 t 检验)。 在 ACS-NSQIP 数据中很少观察到术后并发症的时间群。所述方法可能有助于评估其他外科领域的群集现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信