What does it take to revolutionize Chinese diets: evidence from a choice experiment on urban Chinese consumers

IF 4.4 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Kevin Z. Chen, Luyun Yu, Wen Lin, David L. Ortega
{"title":"What does it take to revolutionize Chinese diets: evidence from a choice experiment on urban Chinese consumers","authors":"Kevin Z. Chen, Luyun Yu, Wen Lin, David L. Ortega","doi":"10.1108/caer-04-2023-0079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose is to understand the factors affecting Chinese diet selections and propose strategies for revolutionizing Chinese diets toward healthy ones.Design/methodology/approachThis study implemented an online discrete choice experiment to identify the factors affecting diet selections among urban Chinese consumers. Four different diet patterns were used to label each of the product alternatives in the experiment, which varied in taste and cost. Specifically, implying the healthiness and sustainability of a diet, the diet alternatives included the average diet, the Chinese Food Guide Pagoda diet, the EAT-Lancet diet and the Flexitarian diet. Using consumer data from six provincial capital cities, we used random parameter logit models to estimate their preferences.FindingsDiet type and diet cost were found to be more important in urban Chinese consumers' diet selections than the ability to customize taste. The average diet, although not healthy and sustainable, was preferred most by respondents, signaling the challenges of shifting the consumer diet in China. Increasing the cost of the average diet can significantly promote sustainable healthy diet choices among urban Chinese residents. In other words, improving the affordability of sustainable healthy diets would have the potential to fuel the diet revolution in China.Originality/valueInstead of choices of a single food item, this paper focused on the individual selection of a diet, where different food products can act as substitutes or as complements for one another. We also proposed a way to assess individual preferences and valuations for several different diets.","PeriodicalId":10095,"journal":{"name":"China Agricultural Economic Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Agricultural Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/caer-04-2023-0079","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose is to understand the factors affecting Chinese diet selections and propose strategies for revolutionizing Chinese diets toward healthy ones.Design/methodology/approachThis study implemented an online discrete choice experiment to identify the factors affecting diet selections among urban Chinese consumers. Four different diet patterns were used to label each of the product alternatives in the experiment, which varied in taste and cost. Specifically, implying the healthiness and sustainability of a diet, the diet alternatives included the average diet, the Chinese Food Guide Pagoda diet, the EAT-Lancet diet and the Flexitarian diet. Using consumer data from six provincial capital cities, we used random parameter logit models to estimate their preferences.FindingsDiet type and diet cost were found to be more important in urban Chinese consumers' diet selections than the ability to customize taste. The average diet, although not healthy and sustainable, was preferred most by respondents, signaling the challenges of shifting the consumer diet in China. Increasing the cost of the average diet can significantly promote sustainable healthy diet choices among urban Chinese residents. In other words, improving the affordability of sustainable healthy diets would have the potential to fuel the diet revolution in China.Originality/valueInstead of choices of a single food item, this paper focused on the individual selection of a diet, where different food products can act as substitutes or as complements for one another. We also proposed a way to assess individual preferences and valuations for several different diets.
彻底改变中国人的饮食习惯需要什么:来自中国城市消费者选择实验的证据
目的了解影响中国人饮食选择的因素,并提出使中国人饮食向健康方向转变的策略。设计/方法/途径本研究通过在线离散选择实验来确定影响中国城市消费者饮食选择的因素。实验中的每种产品都有四种不同的饮食模式,其口味和成本也各不相同。具体来说,四种膳食模式意味着膳食的健康性和可持续性,包括普通膳食、中国膳食指南宝塔膳食、EAT-Lancet膳食和Flexitarian膳食。我们利用六个省会城市的消费者数据,使用随机参数 logit 模型来估计他们的偏好。研究结果发现,在中国城市消费者的膳食选择中,膳食类型和膳食成本比口味定制能力更为重要。普通膳食虽然不健康且不可持续,但却最受受访者青睐,这表明中国消费者膳食结构的转变面临挑战。提高普通膳食的成本可以显著促进中国城市居民选择可持续的健康膳食。换句话说,提高可持续健康膳食的可负担性将有可能推动中国的膳食革命。原创性/价值本文关注的不是单一食品的选择,而是个人对膳食的选择,不同的食品可以相互替代或互补。我们还提出了一种评估个人对几种不同饮食的偏好和价值的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
China Agricultural Economic Review
China Agricultural Economic Review AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
41
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published in association with China Agricultural University and the Chinese Association for Agricultural Economics, China Agricultural Economic Review publishes academic writings by international scholars, and particularly encourages empirical work that can be replicated and extended by others; and research articles that employ econometric and statistical hypothesis testing, optimization and simulation models. The journal aims to publish research which can be applied to China’s agricultural and rural policy-making process, the development of the agricultural economics discipline and to developing countries hoping to learn from China’s agricultural and rural development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信