The Effect of Implementing Cornell Note-Taking Strategies on New Students’ Performance in Listening Comprehension

Osama Yousif Ibrahim Abualzain
{"title":"The Effect of Implementing Cornell Note-Taking Strategies on New Students’ Performance in Listening Comprehension","authors":"Osama Yousif Ibrahim Abualzain","doi":"10.17507/tpls.1408.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the effect of employing Cornell note-taking strategies to improve new students' performance in listening comprehension at Albaha University in the Faculty of Science and Arts, Al Mandaq. The study's population consisted of 40 first-year male students enrolled in the preparatory year program for various science subjects, including Physics, Chemistry, Biology, and Mathematics, in the academic year 2021–2022. These students were enrolled in a listening course, making them suitable candidates for the study. They were divided equally into two groups: the control group and the experimental group. The experimental group underwent a training program using Cornell note-taking strategies, while the control group received no training and just completed the course as normal. The data was obtained and framed using a descriptive qualitative method. To collect the data, a pre-test and post-test were designed to measure the students’ performance before and after the training program. The data was then analyzed using the SPSS program. The findings revealed clear progress in the performance of the experimental group compared to the control group. The poor performance of the control group was attributed to their lack of knowledge about note-taking strategies and their insufficient practice of and feedback on Cornell note-taking strategies.","PeriodicalId":23004,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice in Language Studies","volume":"43 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice in Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1408.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of employing Cornell note-taking strategies to improve new students' performance in listening comprehension at Albaha University in the Faculty of Science and Arts, Al Mandaq. The study's population consisted of 40 first-year male students enrolled in the preparatory year program for various science subjects, including Physics, Chemistry, Biology, and Mathematics, in the academic year 2021–2022. These students were enrolled in a listening course, making them suitable candidates for the study. They were divided equally into two groups: the control group and the experimental group. The experimental group underwent a training program using Cornell note-taking strategies, while the control group received no training and just completed the course as normal. The data was obtained and framed using a descriptive qualitative method. To collect the data, a pre-test and post-test were designed to measure the students’ performance before and after the training program. The data was then analyzed using the SPSS program. The findings revealed clear progress in the performance of the experimental group compared to the control group. The poor performance of the control group was attributed to their lack of knowledge about note-taking strategies and their insufficient practice of and feedback on Cornell note-taking strategies.
实施康奈尔笔记策略对新生听力理解成绩的影响
本研究调查了康奈尔笔记策略对提高曼达克阿尔巴哈大学科学与艺术学院新生听力理解成绩的影响。研究对象包括 40 名一年级男生,他们都是 2021-2022 学年理科预科班的学生,包括物理、化学、生物和数学。这些学生选修了听力课程,因此适合参加本研究。他们被平均分为两组:对照组和实验组。实验组接受了康奈尔笔记策略的培训,而对照组没有接受任何培训,只是正常完成课程。数据采用描述性定性方法获取和整理。为了收集数据,我们设计了前测和后测,以衡量学生在培训计划前后的表现。然后使用 SPSS 程序对数据进行分析。结果显示,与对照组相比,实验组的成绩明显进步。对照组成绩不佳的原因是他们对笔记策略缺乏了解,对康奈尔笔记策略的练习和反馈不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信