Comparative Analysis of Ecological Discourse From the Perspective of Appraisal Theory: The Ponds and The Pond in Winter in Walden

Run Wang, Weina Li
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Ecological Discourse From the Perspective of Appraisal Theory: The Ponds and The Pond in Winter in Walden","authors":"Run Wang, Weina Li","doi":"10.17507/tpls.1408.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper intends to use UAM Corpus Tool 6.2 corpus annotation software to conduct a comparative ecological discourse analysis of the selections of the ecological literary work Walden - The Ponds and The Pond in Winter from the perspective of the attitude system of appraisal theory, aiming to reveal Thoreau’s attitude towards ecological environment and to prove the practicality of appraisal theory in the ecological discourse analysis of the literary work, and at the same time, to broaden the research for the ecological discourse analysis. It was found that the number of appreciative resources in The Ponds (412) was much greater than the number of judgement (61) and affect (39) resources and that the number of positive eco-discourses (270) and neutral/ambiguous eco-discourses (179) was also much greater than the number of negative discourses (63). The number of appraisal resources (185) in The Pond in Winter is much larger than that of judgement resources (50) and emotion resources (35), and the number of positive ecological discourses (270) and neutral/ambiguous ecological discourses (179) is much larger than that of negative ecological discourses (63), and positive ecological discourse (172) is much larger than neutral/ambiguous ecological discourse (65) and negative discourse (33). This reflects Thoreau’s ecological orientation of loving nature, respecting nature, opposing excessive destruction of nature by human beings, and advocating calling on human beings to protect nature.","PeriodicalId":23004,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice in Language Studies","volume":"50 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice in Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1408.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper intends to use UAM Corpus Tool 6.2 corpus annotation software to conduct a comparative ecological discourse analysis of the selections of the ecological literary work Walden - The Ponds and The Pond in Winter from the perspective of the attitude system of appraisal theory, aiming to reveal Thoreau’s attitude towards ecological environment and to prove the practicality of appraisal theory in the ecological discourse analysis of the literary work, and at the same time, to broaden the research for the ecological discourse analysis. It was found that the number of appreciative resources in The Ponds (412) was much greater than the number of judgement (61) and affect (39) resources and that the number of positive eco-discourses (270) and neutral/ambiguous eco-discourses (179) was also much greater than the number of negative discourses (63). The number of appraisal resources (185) in The Pond in Winter is much larger than that of judgement resources (50) and emotion resources (35), and the number of positive ecological discourses (270) and neutral/ambiguous ecological discourses (179) is much larger than that of negative ecological discourses (63), and positive ecological discourse (172) is much larger than neutral/ambiguous ecological discourse (65) and negative discourse (33). This reflects Thoreau’s ecological orientation of loving nature, respecting nature, opposing excessive destruction of nature by human beings, and advocating calling on human beings to protect nature.
从评价理论的角度对生态话语进行比较分析:瓦尔登湖》中的池塘和冬天的池塘
本文拟运用UAM Corpus Tool 6.2语料库标注软件,从评价理论的态度系统角度对生态文学作品《瓦尔登湖-池塘》和《冬日的池塘》选段进行生态话语比较分析,旨在揭示梭罗对生态环境的态度,证明评价理论在文学作品生态话语分析中的实用性,同时拓宽生态话语分析的研究视野。研究发现,《池塘》中赞赏资源的数量(412)远远多于判断资源(61)和情感资源(39),积极生态话语(270)和中性/模糊生态话语(179)的数量也远远多于消极话语(63)。冬日的池塘》中评价资源(185)的数量远大于判断资源(50)和情感资源(35),积极生态论述(270)和中性/模糊生态论述(179)的数量远大于消极生态论述(63),积极生态论述(172)远大于中性/模糊生态论述(65)和消极论述(33)。这反映了梭罗热爱自然、尊重自然、反对人类过度破坏自然、倡导呼吁人类保护自然的生态取向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信