Effects of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with and without Electrical Muscle Stimulation on spasticity, gait and lower limb function in chronic stroke patients

Shanza Khan, Wajiha Shahid, Raheema Khalid, Maira Pervez, Rahma Hameed, Sidra Khaliq
{"title":"Effects of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with and without Electrical Muscle Stimulation on spasticity, gait and lower limb function in chronic stroke patients","authors":"Shanza Khan, Wajiha Shahid, Raheema Khalid, Maira Pervez, Rahma Hameed, Sidra Khaliq","doi":"10.61919/jhrr.v4i3.1204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Stroke, a leading cause of death and disability, is characterized by a sudden disruption of blood flow to the brain, resulting in motor weakness and hemiparesis. Rehabilitation aims to improve functional outcomes, with Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) and Electrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS) being promising interventions.\nObjective: This study aimed to determine the effects of PNF with and without EMS on spasticity, gait, and lower limb function in chronic stroke patients.\nMethods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 22 participants recruited from the physiotherapy department of District Headquarters Sheikhupura from October 2022 to May 2023. Participants were randomly divided into a control group, receiving PNF techniques alone, and an experimental group, receiving PNF combined with EMS. The PNF techniques included rhythmic initiation, stabilizing reversals, and dynamic reversals, while EMS was applied at a frequency of 25 to 50 Hz for 10 seconds, three times a week for six weeks. Outcome measures included the Modified Ashworth Scale, Modified Barthel Index, Dynamic Gait Index, and Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.\nResults: Post-intervention, the experimental group showed significant improvements over the control group in the Modified Ashworth Scale (p=0.022), Modified Barthel Index (p=0.028), Dynamic Gait Index (p=0.042), and Tinetti Assessment (p=0.004).\nConclusion: The study concluded that combining PNF with EMS yields better outcomes in managing spasticity, gait, and lower limb functions in chronic stroke patients than PNF alone.","PeriodicalId":507812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i3.1204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke, a leading cause of death and disability, is characterized by a sudden disruption of blood flow to the brain, resulting in motor weakness and hemiparesis. Rehabilitation aims to improve functional outcomes, with Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) and Electrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS) being promising interventions. Objective: This study aimed to determine the effects of PNF with and without EMS on spasticity, gait, and lower limb function in chronic stroke patients. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 22 participants recruited from the physiotherapy department of District Headquarters Sheikhupura from October 2022 to May 2023. Participants were randomly divided into a control group, receiving PNF techniques alone, and an experimental group, receiving PNF combined with EMS. The PNF techniques included rhythmic initiation, stabilizing reversals, and dynamic reversals, while EMS was applied at a frequency of 25 to 50 Hz for 10 seconds, three times a week for six weeks. Outcome measures included the Modified Ashworth Scale, Modified Barthel Index, Dynamic Gait Index, and Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Results: Post-intervention, the experimental group showed significant improvements over the control group in the Modified Ashworth Scale (p=0.022), Modified Barthel Index (p=0.028), Dynamic Gait Index (p=0.042), and Tinetti Assessment (p=0.004). Conclusion: The study concluded that combining PNF with EMS yields better outcomes in managing spasticity, gait, and lower limb functions in chronic stroke patients than PNF alone.
肌肉电刺激与非肌肉电刺激疗法对慢性中风患者痉挛、步态和下肢功能的影响
背景:脑卒中是导致死亡和残疾的主要原因,其特点是大脑血流突然中断,导致运动无力和偏瘫。康复治疗的目的是改善功能预后,其中感觉神经肌肉刺激法(PNF)和肌肉电刺激法(EMS)是很有前景的干预措施:本研究旨在确定使用或不使用 EMS 的 PNF 对慢性中风患者的痉挛、步态和下肢功能的影响:从 2022 年 10 月至 2023 年 5 月,从谢赫普拉区总部物理治疗部招募了 22 名参与者,进行了随机对照试验。参与者被随机分为对照组和实验组,对照组仅接受 PNF 技术,实验组则接受 PNF 与 EMS 联合治疗。PNF技术包括有节奏的启动、稳定反转和动态反转,而EMS的频率为25至50赫兹,持续10秒钟,每周三次,持续六周。结果测量包括改良阿什沃斯量表、改良巴特尔指数、动态步态指数和 Tinetti 运动能力评估。数据使用 SPSS 25 版进行分析:干预后,实验组在改良阿什沃斯量表(P=0.022)、改良巴特尔指数(P=0.028)、动态步态指数(P=0.042)和蒂内蒂评估(P=0.004)方面均比对照组有显著改善:该研究得出结论:与单独使用神经阻滞疗法相比,将神经阻滞疗法与急救医疗服务结合使用,能更好地控制慢性中风患者的痉挛、步态和下肢功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信