The malnutrition in AECOPD and its association with unfavorable outcomes by comparing PNI, GNRI with the GLIM criteria: a retrospective cohort study

Xueyang Zhang, Yu Wang, Minmin Xu, Yuanyi Zhang, Quanjun Lyu
{"title":"The malnutrition in AECOPD and its association with unfavorable outcomes by comparing PNI, GNRI with the GLIM criteria: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"Xueyang Zhang, Yu Wang, Minmin Xu, Yuanyi Zhang, Quanjun Lyu","doi":"10.3389/fnut.2024.1365462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The management of nutritional risk has garnered significant attention in individuals diagnosed with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) due to the high prevalence of malnutrition and its correlation with unfavorable outcomes. While numerous rating scales exist to assist in assessment for both clinical and research purposes, there is considerable variability in the selection of scales based on the characteristics of the study participants and the study design. The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in identifying malnutrition and predicting prognosis in elderly AECOPD patients.From January 2022 to December 2022, a consecutive inclusion of elderly AECOPD patients admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University was conducted. Diagnosing malnutrition in patients using PNI and GNRI, comparing the results with the diagnostic outcomes based on the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria through Receiver Operating Characteristic curves. Logistic regression analysis was employed to assess the risks associated with length of stay (LOS), hospitalization costs, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) based on GLIM, GNRI, or PNI.A total of 839 elderly AECOPD patients were investigated in the study. The GNRI and PNI demonstrated a sensitivity of 89.5 and 74.1%, specificity of 77.2 and 66.4%, and an area under the curve of 0.834 and 0.702, respectively. The identification of high malnutrition-risk cases using the GLIM, GNRI and PNI were associated with a significant increase in the risk of LOS over 7 days [odds ratio (95% CI) for GLIM, GNRI, PNI: 1.376 (1.033–1.833); 1.405 (1.070–1.846); 1.875 (1.425–2.468)] and higher hospitalization expenses [OR (95% CI) for GLIM, GNRI: 1.498 (1.080–2.080); 1.510 (1.097–2.079)], but not with the CCI.According to our study, it is possible to use GNRI and PNI as alternatives to GLIM in the context of AECOPD, which makes it easier to identify malnutrition. The utilization of GNRI and PNI as alternatives to GLIM in the context of AECOPD enables the identification of malnutrition. The presence of malnourished individuals experiencing AECOPD is correlated with higher probabilities of extended hospital stays and escalated in-hospital expenses.","PeriodicalId":505031,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Nutrition","volume":"79 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1365462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The management of nutritional risk has garnered significant attention in individuals diagnosed with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) due to the high prevalence of malnutrition and its correlation with unfavorable outcomes. While numerous rating scales exist to assist in assessment for both clinical and research purposes, there is considerable variability in the selection of scales based on the characteristics of the study participants and the study design. The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in identifying malnutrition and predicting prognosis in elderly AECOPD patients.From January 2022 to December 2022, a consecutive inclusion of elderly AECOPD patients admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University was conducted. Diagnosing malnutrition in patients using PNI and GNRI, comparing the results with the diagnostic outcomes based on the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria through Receiver Operating Characteristic curves. Logistic regression analysis was employed to assess the risks associated with length of stay (LOS), hospitalization costs, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) based on GLIM, GNRI, or PNI.A total of 839 elderly AECOPD patients were investigated in the study. The GNRI and PNI demonstrated a sensitivity of 89.5 and 74.1%, specificity of 77.2 and 66.4%, and an area under the curve of 0.834 and 0.702, respectively. The identification of high malnutrition-risk cases using the GLIM, GNRI and PNI were associated with a significant increase in the risk of LOS over 7 days [odds ratio (95% CI) for GLIM, GNRI, PNI: 1.376 (1.033–1.833); 1.405 (1.070–1.846); 1.875 (1.425–2.468)] and higher hospitalization expenses [OR (95% CI) for GLIM, GNRI: 1.498 (1.080–2.080); 1.510 (1.097–2.079)], but not with the CCI.According to our study, it is possible to use GNRI and PNI as alternatives to GLIM in the context of AECOPD, which makes it easier to identify malnutrition. The utilization of GNRI and PNI as alternatives to GLIM in the context of AECOPD enables the identification of malnutrition. The presence of malnourished individuals experiencing AECOPD is correlated with higher probabilities of extended hospital stays and escalated in-hospital expenses.
通过比较 PNI、GNRI 和 GLIM 标准,研究 AECOPD 患者的营养不良状况及其与不良预后的关系:一项回顾性队列研究
慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(AECOPD)患者营养不良的发病率很高,而且营养不良与不良预后相关,因此营养风险管理备受关注。虽然有许多评分量表可用于临床和研究目的的辅助评估,但根据研究参与者的特征和研究设计,量表的选择存在相当大的差异。本研究旨在探讨老年营养风险指数(GNRI)和预后营养指数(PNI)在识别老年AECOPD患者营养不良和预测预后方面的功效。2022年1月至2022年12月,连续纳入郑州大学第一附属医院收治的老年AECOPD患者。利用PNI和GNRI诊断患者营养不良,通过接收者工作特征曲线将结果与基于全球营养不良领导倡议(GLIM)标准的诊断结果进行比较。该研究共调查了 839 名老年 AECOPD 患者。GNRI和PNI的灵敏度分别为89.5%和74.1%,特异度分别为77.2%和66.4%,曲线下面积分别为0.834和0.702。使用 GLIM、GNRI 和 PNI 识别高营养不良风险病例与超过 7 天的 LOS 风险显著增加有关[GLIM、GNRI 和 PNI 的几率比(95% CI):1.376 (1.033-1.833);1.405 (1.070-1.846);1.875 (1.425-2.468)] 和更高的住院率。根据我们的研究,在 AECOPD 的情况下,可以使用 GNRI 和 PNI 作为 GLIM 的替代方案,这样更容易识别营养不良。在 AECOPD 的情况下,使用 GNRI 和 PNI 作为 GLIM 的替代方法可以识别营养不良。发生 AECOPD 的营养不良患者与住院时间延长和院内费用增加的概率较高相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信