Farmers’ Willingness to Engage in Ecological Compensation for Crop Rotation in China’s Black Soil Regions

Ruhao Xue, Bonoua Faye, Rui Zhang, Xin Gong, Guoming Du
{"title":"Farmers’ Willingness to Engage in Ecological Compensation for Crop Rotation in China’s Black Soil Regions","authors":"Ruhao Xue, Bonoua Faye, Rui Zhang, Xin Gong, Guoming Du","doi":"10.3390/agriculture14081320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessments of farmer satisfaction can be a crucial tool for effectively implementing an appropriate ecological compensation policy. This study evaluates the effectiveness of an ecological compensation policy for crop rotation in China’s black soil regions from the perspective of farmer satisfaction. Specifically, utilizing an improved entropy TOPSIS, logistic regression, and the obstacle degree model, this empirical study analyzes the performance of the ecological compensation policy for crop rotation in black soil regions and identifies barriers in Heilongjiang Province. The findings indicate that gender significantly and positively affects outcomes at the 10% level, while age has a notable influence at the 5% level. Additionally, the family labor force and the quality of cultivated land, both significant at the 5% level with negative coefficients, suggest a diminished likelihood of farmers participating in these ecological compensation projects. The family’s source of income, significantly influential at the 1% level, also indicates a lower propensity among farmers to engage. Performance analysis reveals that the values for variables of satisfaction with the project’s publicity (A1), satisfaction with the protection of farmers’ rights and interest (A3), overall satisfaction with the effectiveness of the project (B1), satisfaction with ecological compensation methods (B3), and satisfaction with household income after the implementation of the project (C1) are above the average. In contrast, values for variables of satisfaction with the supervision and management (A2), satisfaction with the payment of ecological compensation funds (A4), satisfaction level with black soil rotation ecological compensation standards (B2), satisfaction with the welfare level of family life after the implementation of the project (C2), and satisfaction with farmers’ proactive participation in the project (D1) fall below the average of 3.03. Therefore, this study provides a comprehensive framework for assessing the effectiveness of the ecological compensation policy for crop rotation in China’s black soil regions and offers recommendations for enhancing its performance.","PeriodicalId":503580,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture","volume":"87 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14081320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessments of farmer satisfaction can be a crucial tool for effectively implementing an appropriate ecological compensation policy. This study evaluates the effectiveness of an ecological compensation policy for crop rotation in China’s black soil regions from the perspective of farmer satisfaction. Specifically, utilizing an improved entropy TOPSIS, logistic regression, and the obstacle degree model, this empirical study analyzes the performance of the ecological compensation policy for crop rotation in black soil regions and identifies barriers in Heilongjiang Province. The findings indicate that gender significantly and positively affects outcomes at the 10% level, while age has a notable influence at the 5% level. Additionally, the family labor force and the quality of cultivated land, both significant at the 5% level with negative coefficients, suggest a diminished likelihood of farmers participating in these ecological compensation projects. The family’s source of income, significantly influential at the 1% level, also indicates a lower propensity among farmers to engage. Performance analysis reveals that the values for variables of satisfaction with the project’s publicity (A1), satisfaction with the protection of farmers’ rights and interest (A3), overall satisfaction with the effectiveness of the project (B1), satisfaction with ecological compensation methods (B3), and satisfaction with household income after the implementation of the project (C1) are above the average. In contrast, values for variables of satisfaction with the supervision and management (A2), satisfaction with the payment of ecological compensation funds (A4), satisfaction level with black soil rotation ecological compensation standards (B2), satisfaction with the welfare level of family life after the implementation of the project (C2), and satisfaction with farmers’ proactive participation in the project (D1) fall below the average of 3.03. Therefore, this study provides a comprehensive framework for assessing the effectiveness of the ecological compensation policy for crop rotation in China’s black soil regions and offers recommendations for enhancing its performance.
中国黑土区农民参与轮作生态补偿的意愿
农民满意度评估是有效实施适当生态补偿政策的重要工具。本研究从农民满意度的角度评估了中国黑土区轮作生态补偿政策的有效性。具体而言,本实证研究利用改进的熵值 TOPSIS、逻辑回归和障碍度模型,分析了黑龙江省黑土区轮作生态补偿政策的绩效,并找出了黑土区轮作生态补偿政策的障碍。研究结果表明,性别在 10%的水平上对结果有显著的正向影响,而年龄在 5%的水平上对结果有显著影响。此外,家庭劳动力和耕地质量均在 5%的水平上显著,且系数为负,这表明农民参与这些生态补偿项目的可能性降低。家庭收入来源在 1%的水平上有显著影响,也表明农民参与的倾向性较低。绩效分析表明,项目宣传满意度(A1)、农民权益保护满意度(A3)、项目效果总体满意度(B1)、生态补偿方式满意度(B3)和项目实施后家庭收入满意度(C1)的变量值均高于平均值。而监督管理满意度(A2)、生态补偿资金支付满意度(A4)、黑土轮作生态补偿标准满意度(B2)、项目实施后家庭生活福利水平满意度(C2)、农民主动参与项目满意度(D1)等变量值低于平均值 3.03。因此,本研究为评估中国黑土区轮作生态补偿政策的有效性提供了一个综合框架,并为提高其绩效提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信