Detection capacity of small intestine bacterial or methanogen overgrowth by lactose and fructose breath testing in the adult population

Emilio José Laserna Mendieta, V. Martín Domínguez, Irene Pérez Lucendo, Inmaculada Granero Cremades, Raquel Ferreirós Martínez, Tomás Álvarez Malé, M. A. Sanz de Benito, C. Santander
{"title":"Detection capacity of small intestine bacterial or methanogen overgrowth by lactose and fructose breath testing in the adult population","authors":"Emilio José Laserna Mendieta, V. Martín Domínguez, Irene Pérez Lucendo, Inmaculada Granero Cremades, Raquel Ferreirós Martínez, Tomás Álvarez Malé, M. A. Sanz de Benito, C. Santander","doi":"10.1515/almed-2024-0115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Exhaled breath tests (BTs) are the main diagnostic method for fructose and lactose malabsorption/intolerance (FI and LI, respectively) and for detecting small intestine bacterial or methanogen overgrowth (SIBO/IMO). Although FI/LI-BTs may provide evidence of the presence of SIBO/IMO, there is limited literature evaluating their reliability for this purpose. The objective of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of FI/LI-BTs in detecting SIBO and their concordance with SIBO-BTs in the identification of IMO.\n \n \n \n In this retrospective observational study, FI/LI-BTs and SIBO-BTs performed in the same patients within a period of 6 weeks were selected from 652 gas chromatography-based BTs.\n \n \n \n A total of 146 BTs from 67 eligible adult patients were identified. LI-BTs had higher specificity than FI-BT in detecting SIBO (93.8 % vs. 72.7 %). In contrast, FI-BTs showed higher sensitivity (60.0 % vs. 28.6 %) as FI was more frequently established in SIBO-positive patients (70 % vs. 29 %). With regard to IMO, concordance with LI-BT was 100 %, with a 27 % of false negatives on FI-BTs.\n \n \n \n Findings suggestive of SIBO or IMO on LI-BTs were highly consistent with those of SIBO-BTs. In contrast, the rate of false positives for SIBO and the rate of false negative for IMO on FI-BTs was 27 % in both cases.\n","PeriodicalId":7333,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Laboratory Medicine / Avances en Medicina de Laboratorio","volume":"5 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Laboratory Medicine / Avances en Medicina de Laboratorio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/almed-2024-0115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exhaled breath tests (BTs) are the main diagnostic method for fructose and lactose malabsorption/intolerance (FI and LI, respectively) and for detecting small intestine bacterial or methanogen overgrowth (SIBO/IMO). Although FI/LI-BTs may provide evidence of the presence of SIBO/IMO, there is limited literature evaluating their reliability for this purpose. The objective of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of FI/LI-BTs in detecting SIBO and their concordance with SIBO-BTs in the identification of IMO. In this retrospective observational study, FI/LI-BTs and SIBO-BTs performed in the same patients within a period of 6 weeks were selected from 652 gas chromatography-based BTs. A total of 146 BTs from 67 eligible adult patients were identified. LI-BTs had higher specificity than FI-BT in detecting SIBO (93.8 % vs. 72.7 %). In contrast, FI-BTs showed higher sensitivity (60.0 % vs. 28.6 %) as FI was more frequently established in SIBO-positive patients (70 % vs. 29 %). With regard to IMO, concordance with LI-BT was 100 %, with a 27 % of false negatives on FI-BTs. Findings suggestive of SIBO or IMO on LI-BTs were highly consistent with those of SIBO-BTs. In contrast, the rate of false positives for SIBO and the rate of false negative for IMO on FI-BTs was 27 % in both cases.
通过乳糖和果糖呼气试验检测成人小肠细菌或甲烷菌过度生长的能力
呼气试验(BT)是诊断果糖和乳糖吸收不良/不耐受(分别为 FI 和 LI)以及检测小肠细菌或甲烷原过度生长(SIBO/IMO)的主要方法。虽然 FI/LI-BT 可以提供 SIBO/IMO 存在的证据,但评估其可靠性的文献却很有限。本研究的目的是评估 FI/LI-BT 在检测 SIBO 方面的敏感性和特异性,以及它们与 SIBO-BT 在识别 IMO 方面的一致性。 在这项回顾性观察研究中,从 652 例气相色谱法 BT 中筛选出在 6 周内对同一患者进行的 FI/LI-BT 和 SIBO-BT。 共从 67 名符合条件的成年患者中筛选出 146 例 BT。在检测 SIBO 方面,LI-BT 的特异性高于 FI-BT(93.8% 对 72.7%)。相比之下,FI-BT 的灵敏度更高(60.0% 对 28.6%),因为在 SIBO 阳性患者中 FI 更常见(70% 对 29%)。至于 IMO,与 LI-BT 的一致性为 100%,而 FI-BT 的假阴性率为 27%。 LI-BT与SIBO-BT提示的SIBO或IMO结果高度一致。而在 FI-BT 中,SIBO 的假阳性率和 IMO 的假阴性率均为 27%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信