Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Punching Shear Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforced Concrete Slabs Using a Gradient-Boosted Regression Tree

Materials Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.3390/ma17163964
Emad A. Abood, Marwa Hameed Abdallah, Mahmood Alsaadi, Hamza Imran, L. Bernardo, D. De Domenico, Sadiq N. Henedy
{"title":"Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Punching Shear Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforced Concrete Slabs Using a Gradient-Boosted Regression Tree","authors":"Emad A. Abood, Marwa Hameed Abdallah, Mahmood Alsaadi, Hamza Imran, L. Bernardo, D. De Domenico, Sadiq N. Henedy","doi":"10.3390/ma17163964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs) are increasingly being used as a composite material in concrete slabs due to their high strength-to-weight ratio and resistance to corrosion. However, FRP-reinforced concrete slabs, similar to traditional systems, are susceptible to punching shear failure, a critical design concern. Existing empirical models and design provisions for predicting the punching shear strength of FRP-reinforced concrete slabs often exhibit significant bias and dispersion. These errors highlight the need for more reliable predictive models. This study aims to develop gradient-boosted regression tree (GBRT) models to accurately predict the shear strength of FRP-reinforced concrete panels and to address the limitations of existing empirical models. A comprehensive database of 238 sets of experimental results for FRP-reinforced concrete slabs has been compiled from the literature. Different machine learning algorithms were considered, and the performance of GBRT models was evaluated against these algorithms. The dataset was divided into training and testing sets to verify the accuracy of the model. The results indicated that the GBRT model achieved the highest prediction accuracy, with root mean square error (RMSE) of 64.85, mean absolute error (MAE) of 42.89, and coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.955. Comparative analysis with existing experimental models showed that the GBRT model outperformed these traditional approaches. The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method was used to interpret the GBRT model, providing insight into the contribution of each input variable to the prediction of punching shear strength. The analysis emphasized the importance of variables such as slab thickness, FRP reinforcement ratio, and critical section perimeter. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of the GBRT model in predicting the punching shear strength of FRP-reinforced concrete slabs with high accuracy. SHAP analysis elucidates key factors that influence model predictions and provides valuable insights for future research and design improvements.","PeriodicalId":503043,"journal":{"name":"Materials","volume":"3 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17163964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs) are increasingly being used as a composite material in concrete slabs due to their high strength-to-weight ratio and resistance to corrosion. However, FRP-reinforced concrete slabs, similar to traditional systems, are susceptible to punching shear failure, a critical design concern. Existing empirical models and design provisions for predicting the punching shear strength of FRP-reinforced concrete slabs often exhibit significant bias and dispersion. These errors highlight the need for more reliable predictive models. This study aims to develop gradient-boosted regression tree (GBRT) models to accurately predict the shear strength of FRP-reinforced concrete panels and to address the limitations of existing empirical models. A comprehensive database of 238 sets of experimental results for FRP-reinforced concrete slabs has been compiled from the literature. Different machine learning algorithms were considered, and the performance of GBRT models was evaluated against these algorithms. The dataset was divided into training and testing sets to verify the accuracy of the model. The results indicated that the GBRT model achieved the highest prediction accuracy, with root mean square error (RMSE) of 64.85, mean absolute error (MAE) of 42.89, and coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.955. Comparative analysis with existing experimental models showed that the GBRT model outperformed these traditional approaches. The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method was used to interpret the GBRT model, providing insight into the contribution of each input variable to the prediction of punching shear strength. The analysis emphasized the importance of variables such as slab thickness, FRP reinforcement ratio, and critical section perimeter. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of the GBRT model in predicting the punching shear strength of FRP-reinforced concrete slabs with high accuracy. SHAP analysis elucidates key factors that influence model predictions and provides valuable insights for future research and design improvements.
基于机器学习的纤维增强聚合物钢筋混凝土板冲剪强度预测模型(使用梯度提升回归树
纤维增强聚合物(FRP)因其高强度重量比和耐腐蚀性,正越来越多地被用作混凝土板的复合材料。然而,玻璃纤维增强混凝土板与传统系统类似,容易受冲剪破坏,这是设计中的一个关键问题。用于预测 FRP 加固混凝土板冲剪强度的现有经验模型和设计规定通常会表现出明显的偏差和分散性。这些误差凸显了对更可靠预测模型的需求。本研究旨在开发梯度增强回归树(GBRT)模型,以准确预测玻璃钢加固混凝土板的抗剪强度,并解决现有经验模型的局限性。从文献中整理出了一个包含 238 组 FRP 加固混凝土板实验结果的综合数据库。考虑了不同的机器学习算法,并根据这些算法评估了 GBRT 模型的性能。数据集被分为训练集和测试集,以验证模型的准确性。结果表明,GBRT 模型的预测精度最高,均方根误差(RMSE)为 64.85,平均绝对误差(MAE)为 42.89,判定系数(R2)为 0.955。与现有实验模型的比较分析表明,GBRT 模型的性能优于这些传统方法。使用 SHapley Additive exPlanation(SHAP)方法对 GBRT 模型进行了解释,从而深入了解了每个输入变量对预测冲切剪切强度的贡献。分析强调了板厚、FRP 配筋率和临界截面周长等变量的重要性。这项研究证明了 GBRT 模型在高精度预测 FRP 加固混凝土板的冲剪强度方面的有效性。SHAP 分析阐明了影响模型预测的关键因素,并为今后的研究和设计改进提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信