An Investigation into Collaborative Stakeholder Engagement’s Effect on Teacher Professional Development Implementation in Kenya

Samuel Wafula, S. Likoko, Paul Obino
{"title":"An Investigation into Collaborative Stakeholder Engagement’s Effect on Teacher Professional Development Implementation in Kenya","authors":"Samuel Wafula, S. Likoko, Paul Obino","doi":"10.37284/eajes.7.3.2096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quality education is attributed to the quality of teaching. Teacher Professional Development (TPD) is vital towards improved quality of teaching in Kenya. To achieve this, Teachers Service Commission (TSC) rolled out TPD, whose successful implementation is at risk due to criticism from various stakeholders. This study sought to investigate the effect of stakeholder collaboration on implementation of TPD in Kenya. It adopted a descriptive survey study design. The study targeted a population of 327349 teachers from public schools and 188 TPD coordinators from accredited TPD service providers. Using the Krejcie and Morgan Table of 1970, a sample of 384 teachers, and 8 TPD coordinators was adequate for the study. However, to increase the statistical power of the study, the researcher used a sample of 404 respondents. Simple random sampling was used to identify one institution accredited to offer TPD. Each accredited institution enrolled teachers across Kenya. Exponential non-discriminative snowball sampling was used to select teacher respondents. TPD coordinators were selected by purposive sampling. Cluster sampling was used to ensure all the regions were included in the study. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected using questionnaires and interviews respectively. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics by way of frequencies, mean and standard deviations as well as inferential statistics including Pearson correlation and simple linear regression. The findings showed a significant positive effect of stakeholder collaboration on implementation of TPD. Effects of stakeholder collaboration explained a significant proportion of variation in implementation of TPD with, (t=2.536, B =.285, p<.0001). The study concluded that an increase in stakeholder collaboration positively influenced implementation of TPD. It recommended establishment of an institution mandated to conduct TPD-related activities in Kenya and work in collaboration with relevant education sector stakeholders in order to effectively implement TPD","PeriodicalId":504467,"journal":{"name":"East African Journal of Education Studies","volume":"2 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East African Journal of Education Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.7.3.2096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quality education is attributed to the quality of teaching. Teacher Professional Development (TPD) is vital towards improved quality of teaching in Kenya. To achieve this, Teachers Service Commission (TSC) rolled out TPD, whose successful implementation is at risk due to criticism from various stakeholders. This study sought to investigate the effect of stakeholder collaboration on implementation of TPD in Kenya. It adopted a descriptive survey study design. The study targeted a population of 327349 teachers from public schools and 188 TPD coordinators from accredited TPD service providers. Using the Krejcie and Morgan Table of 1970, a sample of 384 teachers, and 8 TPD coordinators was adequate for the study. However, to increase the statistical power of the study, the researcher used a sample of 404 respondents. Simple random sampling was used to identify one institution accredited to offer TPD. Each accredited institution enrolled teachers across Kenya. Exponential non-discriminative snowball sampling was used to select teacher respondents. TPD coordinators were selected by purposive sampling. Cluster sampling was used to ensure all the regions were included in the study. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected using questionnaires and interviews respectively. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics by way of frequencies, mean and standard deviations as well as inferential statistics including Pearson correlation and simple linear regression. The findings showed a significant positive effect of stakeholder collaboration on implementation of TPD. Effects of stakeholder collaboration explained a significant proportion of variation in implementation of TPD with, (t=2.536, B =.285, p<.0001). The study concluded that an increase in stakeholder collaboration positively influenced implementation of TPD. It recommended establishment of an institution mandated to conduct TPD-related activities in Kenya and work in collaboration with relevant education sector stakeholders in order to effectively implement TPD
调查利益相关者的合作参与对肯尼亚教师专业发展实施的影响
优质教育取决于教学质量。教师专业发展(TPD)对于提高肯尼亚的教学质量至关重要。为实现这一目标,教师服务委员会(TSC)推出了教师专业发展计划(TPD),但由于各利益相关方的批评,该计划的成功实施面临风险。本研究旨在调查利益相关者的合作对肯尼亚实施 TPD 的影响。研究采用了描述性调查研究设计。研究对象包括来自公立学校的 327349 名教师和来自经认可的教师专业发展服务提供商的 188 名教师专业发展协调员。根据 1970 年的 Krejcie 和 Morgan 表,384 名教师和 8 名教师专业发展协调员的样本足以满足研究需要。不过,为了提高研究的统计能力,研究人员使用了 404 个受访者样本。研究人员采用简单随机抽样的方法,确定了一所经认可可提供教师培训项目的机构。每所获得认证的机构都在肯尼亚各地招收教师。在选择受访教师时,采用了非歧视性的指数滚雪球抽样法。教师专业发展项目协调员是通过目的性抽样选出的。为了确保所有地区都被纳入研究范围,采用了聚类抽样法。定量和定性数据分别通过问卷和访谈收集。数据分析采用了描述性统计方法,包括频率、平均值和标准偏差,以及推论性统计方法,包括皮尔逊相关性和简单线性回归。研究结果表明,利益相关者的合作对实施技术合作促进发展(TPD)有明显的积极影响。利益相关者合作的影响解释了技术合作促进发展实施过程中的很大一部分变化,(t=2.536,B=.285,p<.0001)。研究得出结论,利益相关者合作的增加对技术促进发展的实施产生了积极影响。研究建议在肯尼亚设立一个机构,负责开展与技术促进发展相关的活动,并与教育部门的相关利益攸关方合作,以有效实施技术促进发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信