Text-Critical Issues Between the Masoretic Text and the Septuagint Text of the Book of Jeremiah

Funke Oyekan, Victor Umaru
{"title":"Text-Critical Issues Between the Masoretic Text and the Septuagint Text of the Book of Jeremiah","authors":"Funke Oyekan, Victor Umaru","doi":"10.61707/xzet1v58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the text-critical issues between the Masoretic Text (MT) and the Septuagint (LXX) versions of the Book of Jeremiah, focusing on orthographic variants, editorial changes, and transcription errors. The study begins with the Masoretic Text, detailing its historical development, transmission, and defining features. It then discusses significant textual variants within the MT tradition, such as spelling, grammar, and word order. The paper then turns to the Septuagint translation, analysing notable differences in wording, verse arrangement, and theological emphases. These differences provide insight into the LXX translators’ interpretive choices and theological perspectives. The analysis reveals distinct theological emphases, scribal tendencies, and translational choices that shape the textual tradition of Jeremiah. The paper reviews scholarly debates on the reliability and significance of the MT and LXX traditions, highlighting diverse interpretive approaches and their implications for modern biblical scholarship. The paper concludes by summarising key findings and emphasising the significance of text-critical analysis in biblical studies.","PeriodicalId":508212,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Religion","volume":"6 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61707/xzet1v58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the text-critical issues between the Masoretic Text (MT) and the Septuagint (LXX) versions of the Book of Jeremiah, focusing on orthographic variants, editorial changes, and transcription errors. The study begins with the Masoretic Text, detailing its historical development, transmission, and defining features. It then discusses significant textual variants within the MT tradition, such as spelling, grammar, and word order. The paper then turns to the Septuagint translation, analysing notable differences in wording, verse arrangement, and theological emphases. These differences provide insight into the LXX translators’ interpretive choices and theological perspectives. The analysis reveals distinct theological emphases, scribal tendencies, and translational choices that shape the textual tradition of Jeremiah. The paper reviews scholarly debates on the reliability and significance of the MT and LXX traditions, highlighting diverse interpretive approaches and their implications for modern biblical scholarship. The paper concludes by summarising key findings and emphasising the significance of text-critical analysis in biblical studies.
耶利米书》马所拉文本与七十士译本之间的文本批判问题
本文探讨了《耶利米书》的马所拉文本(Masoretic Text,MT)和七十士译本(Septuagint,LXX)之间的文本批判问题,重点是正字法变体、编辑改动和转录错误。研究从马所拉文本开始,详细介绍了它的历史发展、传承和特点。然后讨论马所拉文本传统中的重要文本变体,如拼写、语法和词序。然后,论文转向七十士译本,分析其在措辞、诗句安排和神学重点方面的显著差异。这些差异让我们了解到 LXX 译者的解释选择和神学观点。分析揭示了塑造耶利米书文本传统的独特神学重点、抄写倾向和翻译选择。本文回顾了学术界关于 MT 和 LXX 传统的可靠性和重要性的争论,强调了不同的解释方法及其对现代圣经学术的影响。论文最后总结了主要发现,并强调了文本批判分析在圣经研究中的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信