Dimensions and barriers for digital (in)equity and digital divide: a systematic integrative review

M. Raihan, S. Subroto, N. Chowdhury, Katharina Koch, Erin Ruttan, T. Turin
{"title":"Dimensions and barriers for digital (in)equity and digital divide: a systematic integrative review","authors":"M. Raihan, S. Subroto, N. Chowdhury, Katharina Koch, Erin Ruttan, T. Turin","doi":"10.1108/dts-04-2024-0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis integrative review was conducted to provide an overview of existing research on digital (in)equity and the digital divide in developed countries.Design/methodology/approachWe searched academic and grey literature to identify relevant papers. From 8464 academic articles and 183 grey literature, after two levels of screening, 31 articles and 54 documents were selected, respectively. A thematic analysis was conducted following the steps suggested by Braun and Clarke and results were reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.FindingsThe results showed that most articles and papers were either from Europe or North America. Studies used a range of research methods, including quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. The results demonstrated four major dimensions of the digital divide among various vulnerable groups, including digital literacy, affordability, equity-deserving group-sensitive content and availability or access to infrastructure. Among vulnerable groups, low-income people were reported in the majority of the studies followed by older adults, racial and ethnic minorities, newcomers/new immigrants and refugees, Indigenous groups, people with disabilities and women. Most reported barriers included lack of access to the internet, digital skills, language barriers and internet costs.Originality/valueTo the best of our knowledge, there have been limited attempts to thoroughly review the literature to better understand the emerging dimensions of digital equity and the digital divide, identifying major vulnerable populations and their unique barriers and challenges. This review demonstrated that understanding intersectional characteristics (age, gender, disability, race, ethnicity, Indigenous identity and immigration status) and their interconnections is crucial for analyzing the dynamics of digital (in)equity and divide.","PeriodicalId":243384,"journal":{"name":"Digital Transformation and Society","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Transformation and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dts-04-2024-0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis integrative review was conducted to provide an overview of existing research on digital (in)equity and the digital divide in developed countries.Design/methodology/approachWe searched academic and grey literature to identify relevant papers. From 8464 academic articles and 183 grey literature, after two levels of screening, 31 articles and 54 documents were selected, respectively. A thematic analysis was conducted following the steps suggested by Braun and Clarke and results were reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.FindingsThe results showed that most articles and papers were either from Europe or North America. Studies used a range of research methods, including quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. The results demonstrated four major dimensions of the digital divide among various vulnerable groups, including digital literacy, affordability, equity-deserving group-sensitive content and availability or access to infrastructure. Among vulnerable groups, low-income people were reported in the majority of the studies followed by older adults, racial and ethnic minorities, newcomers/new immigrants and refugees, Indigenous groups, people with disabilities and women. Most reported barriers included lack of access to the internet, digital skills, language barriers and internet costs.Originality/valueTo the best of our knowledge, there have been limited attempts to thoroughly review the literature to better understand the emerging dimensions of digital equity and the digital divide, identifying major vulnerable populations and their unique barriers and challenges. This review demonstrated that understanding intersectional characteristics (age, gender, disability, race, ethnicity, Indigenous identity and immigration status) and their interconnections is crucial for analyzing the dynamics of digital (in)equity and divide.
数字(不)公平和数字鸿沟的因素和障碍:系统性综合审查
设计/方法/途径我们检索了学术文献和灰色文献,以确定相关论文。从 8464 篇学术文章和 183 篇灰色文献中,经过两级筛选,分别选出了 31 篇文章和 54 篇文献。我们按照 Braun 和 Clarke 建议的步骤进行了专题分析,并根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南报告了分析结果。研究采用了一系列研究方法,包括定量、定性和混合方法。研究结果表明,不同弱势群体之间的数字鸿沟主要体现在四个方面,包括数字素养、可负担性、公平需求群体敏感内容以及基础设施的可用性或可及性。在弱势群体中,大多数研究报告了低收入人群的情况,其次是老年人、少数种族和族裔、新移民/新移民和难民、土著群体、残疾人和妇女。据我们所知,为了更好地理解数字公平和数字鸿沟的新层面,确定主要弱势群体及其独特的障碍和挑战,对文献进行彻底审查的尝试还很有限。本综述表明,了解交叉特征(年龄、性别、残疾、种族、民族、土著身份和移民身份)及其相互联系对于分析数字(不)公平和鸿沟的动态至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信