Mindfulness in Different Sociodemographic Strata: Partial Validation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in an Indian Sample

IF 0.2 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Buddhaditya Padhi, Nilamadhab Kar, Brajaballav Kar
{"title":"Mindfulness in Different Sociodemographic Strata: Partial Validation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in an Indian Sample","authors":"Buddhaditya Padhi, Nilamadhab Kar, Brajaballav Kar","doi":"10.4103/aip.aip_42_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Mindfulness-based interventions are increasing in clinical and nonclinical populations. It is important to have a culturally validated instrument to measure the construct.\n \n \n \n We intended to evaluate the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) in an Indian sample, for its reliability and dimensionality along with any differences among the sociodemographic strata.\n \n \n \n The design of the study was an online-based survey.\n \n \n \n An anonymous survey was conducted involving adult participants with a convenience and snowball sampling method. Mindfulness based on MAAS responses and demographic details were collected.\n \n \n \n Cronbach’s alpha, t-test, analysis of variance, Tukey’s honestly significant difference test, and factor analysis were used for analysis.\n \n \n \n The average mindfulness score was 4.3 ± 0.78, and skewness was − 0.39. The score was normally distributed. The reliability for the MAAS (Cronbach’s α =0.830) was acceptable. The split-half reliability correlation was 0.66. The mean of item scores varied from 3.52 to 4.85, and the standard deviation varied from 1.2 to 1.6. The factor analysis explained 53% variance and identified four factors named as “inattention to the present,” “lost in thought,” “lack of circumstantial awareness,” and “late realization of feelings.” MAAS scores were significantly different across age, marital status, and occupation but did not differ by gender, education, or economic status.\n \n \n \n It appears that MAAS can be used in the Indian population; however, there is a need for further validation studies, in different specific populations.\n","PeriodicalId":52916,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Indian Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Indian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aip.aip_42_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mindfulness-based interventions are increasing in clinical and nonclinical populations. It is important to have a culturally validated instrument to measure the construct. We intended to evaluate the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) in an Indian sample, for its reliability and dimensionality along with any differences among the sociodemographic strata. The design of the study was an online-based survey. An anonymous survey was conducted involving adult participants with a convenience and snowball sampling method. Mindfulness based on MAAS responses and demographic details were collected. Cronbach’s alpha, t-test, analysis of variance, Tukey’s honestly significant difference test, and factor analysis were used for analysis. The average mindfulness score was 4.3 ± 0.78, and skewness was − 0.39. The score was normally distributed. The reliability for the MAAS (Cronbach’s α =0.830) was acceptable. The split-half reliability correlation was 0.66. The mean of item scores varied from 3.52 to 4.85, and the standard deviation varied from 1.2 to 1.6. The factor analysis explained 53% variance and identified four factors named as “inattention to the present,” “lost in thought,” “lack of circumstantial awareness,” and “late realization of feelings.” MAAS scores were significantly different across age, marital status, and occupation but did not differ by gender, education, or economic status. It appears that MAAS can be used in the Indian population; however, there is a need for further validation studies, in different specific populations.
不同社会人口阶层的正念:印度样本中正念注意意识量表的部分验证
在临床和非临床人群中,以正念为基础的干预措施越来越多。重要的是要有一个经过文化验证的工具来测量这一结构。 我们打算在印度样本中对正念注意力认知量表(MAAS)进行评估,以确定其可靠性和维度,以及社会人口阶层之间的差异。 研究设计了一项在线调查。 采用方便的滚雪球式抽样方法,对成年参与者进行了匿名调查。调查收集了基于 MAAS 反应的正念和人口统计学细节。 分析采用了 Cronbach's alpha、t 检验、方差分析、Tukey's 诚实显著差异检验和因子分析。 正念平均得分为 4.3 ± 0.78,偏度为- 0.39。得分呈正态分布。MAAS 的信度(Cronbach's α =0.830)是可以接受的。分半信度相关为 0.66。项目得分的平均值介于 3.52 和 4.85 之间,标准差介于 1.2 和 1.6 之间。因子分析解释了 53% 的方差,确定了四个因子,分别为 "不关注当下"、"陷入沉思"、"缺乏环境意识 "和 "较晚意识到感受"。不同年龄、婚姻状况和职业的 MAAS 分数有明显差异,但不同性别、教育程度和经济状况的 MAAS 分数没有差异。 由此看来,MAAS 可以用于印度人群;但是,还需要在不同的特定人群中进行进一步的验证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信