Multidimensional frontline management styles: testing HRM strength, workgroup loyalty and helping behaviours

K. Cafferkey, Keith Townsend, Safa Riaz, Ester Ellen Trees Bolt, Md Shamirul Islam
{"title":"Multidimensional frontline management styles: testing HRM strength, workgroup loyalty and helping behaviours","authors":"K. Cafferkey, Keith Townsend, Safa Riaz, Ester Ellen Trees Bolt, Md Shamirul Islam","doi":"10.1108/joepp-03-2024-0090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to investigate the relationships between various frontline management (FLM) styles, human resource management system (HRM) system strength and employees' helping behaviours as a form of organisational citizenship behaviours (OCBs). The research also examines the moderating role of workgroup loyalty in the association between HRM system strength and employees' helping behaviours.Design/methodology/approachThe research uses survey data collected from 315 government workers in Malaysia. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was employed to test the hypothesised relationships.FindingsTwo FLM styles, “policy enactor” and “employee coach,” positively predict employees' helping behaviour. However, the “organisational leader” FLM style did not significantly lead to employees' helping behaviour. HRM system strength significantly mediates the relationship between the three FLM styles and employee helping behaviours. Finally, workgroup loyalty significantly moderates the relationship between HRM system strength and employees’ helping behaviours as OCB.Practical implicationsWith a wealth of literature demonstrating the importance of FLMs in the implementation of HRM and a growing body of literature demonstrating the robust nature of the “system strength” argument, human resource (HR) practitioners are increasingly able to focus their attention on the way the system and FLMs contribute to employee outcomes and organisational performance. Our results indicate that HRM system strength does indeed enhance the impact of FLM styles on employee helping behaviours.Originality/valueThe originality of this paper is that it acknowledges and empirically examines the heterogenous nature of FLM styles, through signalling theory in enacting HRM policies and links the growing FLM literature to the HRM system strength research. These concepts have also been tested for the first time in a Malaysian context.","PeriodicalId":514623,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance","volume":"40 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/joepp-03-2024-0090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to investigate the relationships between various frontline management (FLM) styles, human resource management system (HRM) system strength and employees' helping behaviours as a form of organisational citizenship behaviours (OCBs). The research also examines the moderating role of workgroup loyalty in the association between HRM system strength and employees' helping behaviours.Design/methodology/approachThe research uses survey data collected from 315 government workers in Malaysia. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was employed to test the hypothesised relationships.FindingsTwo FLM styles, “policy enactor” and “employee coach,” positively predict employees' helping behaviour. However, the “organisational leader” FLM style did not significantly lead to employees' helping behaviour. HRM system strength significantly mediates the relationship between the three FLM styles and employee helping behaviours. Finally, workgroup loyalty significantly moderates the relationship between HRM system strength and employees’ helping behaviours as OCB.Practical implicationsWith a wealth of literature demonstrating the importance of FLMs in the implementation of HRM and a growing body of literature demonstrating the robust nature of the “system strength” argument, human resource (HR) practitioners are increasingly able to focus their attention on the way the system and FLMs contribute to employee outcomes and organisational performance. Our results indicate that HRM system strength does indeed enhance the impact of FLM styles on employee helping behaviours.Originality/valueThe originality of this paper is that it acknowledges and empirically examines the heterogenous nature of FLM styles, through signalling theory in enacting HRM policies and links the growing FLM literature to the HRM system strength research. These concepts have also been tested for the first time in a Malaysian context.
多维一线管理风格:测试人力资源管理强度、工作组忠诚度和帮助行为
目的本研究旨在探讨各种前线管理(FLM)风格、人力资源管理体系(HRM)系统强度与作为组织公民行为(OCB)一种形式的员工帮助行为之间的关系。本研究还探讨了工作组忠诚度在人力资源管理体系强度与员工帮助行为之间的关联中的调节作用。研究结果 "政策执行者 "和 "员工教练 "这两种 FLM 风格能积极预测员工的帮助行为。然而,"组织领导者 "的 FLM 风格对员工的帮助行为没有显著影响。人力资源管理体系的优势在很大程度上调节了三种 FLM 风格与员工帮助行为之间的关系。随着大量文献证明了财务自由管理在人力资源管理实施过程中的重要性,以及越来越多的文献证明了 "系统强度 "论点的稳健性,人力资源(HR)从业人员越来越能够将注意力集中在系统和财务自由管理如何促进员工成果和组织绩效上。我们的研究结果表明,人力资源管理体系的优势确实增强了财务自由管理风格对员工帮助行为的影响。本文的独创性在于,它通过制定人力资源管理政策的信号理论,承认并以实证研究了财务自由管理风格的异质性,并将不断发展的财务自由管理文献与人力资源管理体系优势研究联系起来。这些概念也首次在马来西亚的背景下得到验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信