[Diagnosis of Rib Fracture Using Artificial Intelligence on Chest CT Images of Patients with Chest Trauma].

Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-05 DOI:10.3348/jksr.2023.0099
Li Kaike, Riel Castro-Zunti, Seok-Beom Ko, Gong Yong Jin
{"title":"[Diagnosis of Rib Fracture Using Artificial Intelligence on Chest CT Images of Patients with Chest Trauma].","authors":"Li Kaike, Riel Castro-Zunti, Seok-Beom Ko, Gong Yong Jin","doi":"10.3348/jksr.2023.0099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the pros and cons of an artificial intelligence (AI) model developed to diagnose acute rib fractures in chest CT images of patients with chest trauma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 1209 chest CT images (acute rib fracture [<i>n</i> = 1159], normal [<i>n</i> = 50]) were selected among patients with chest trauma. Among 1159 acute rib fracture CT images, 9 were randomly selected for AI model training. 150 acute rib fracture CT images and 50 normal ones were tested, and the remaining 1000 acute rib fracture CT images was internally verified. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy and errors of AI model for the presence and location of acute rib fractures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy for diagnosing acute rib fractures in chest CT images were 93.3%, 94%, 97.9%, 82.5%, and 95.6% respectively. However, the accuracy of the location of acute rib fractures was low at 76% (760/1000). The cause of error in the diagnosis of acute rib fracture seemed to be a result of considering the scapula or clavicle that were in the same position (66%) or some ribs that were not recognized (34%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AI model for diagnosing acute rib fractures showed high accuracy in detecting the presence of acute rib fractures, but diagnosis of the exact location of rib fractures was limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":101329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology","volume":"85 4","pages":"769-779"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11310438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2023.0099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the pros and cons of an artificial intelligence (AI) model developed to diagnose acute rib fractures in chest CT images of patients with chest trauma.

Materials and methods: A total of 1209 chest CT images (acute rib fracture [n = 1159], normal [n = 50]) were selected among patients with chest trauma. Among 1159 acute rib fracture CT images, 9 were randomly selected for AI model training. 150 acute rib fracture CT images and 50 normal ones were tested, and the remaining 1000 acute rib fracture CT images was internally verified. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy and errors of AI model for the presence and location of acute rib fractures.

Results: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy for diagnosing acute rib fractures in chest CT images were 93.3%, 94%, 97.9%, 82.5%, and 95.6% respectively. However, the accuracy of the location of acute rib fractures was low at 76% (760/1000). The cause of error in the diagnosis of acute rib fracture seemed to be a result of considering the scapula or clavicle that were in the same position (66%) or some ribs that were not recognized (34%).

Conclusion: The AI model for diagnosing acute rib fractures showed high accuracy in detecting the presence of acute rib fractures, but diagnosis of the exact location of rib fractures was limited.

[利用人工智能对胸部外伤患者的胸部 CT 图像进行肋骨骨折诊断]。
目的:确定为诊断胸部外伤患者胸部 CT 图像中的急性肋骨骨折而开发的人工智能(AI)模型的优缺点:从胸部外伤患者中选取共 1209 张胸部 CT 图像(急性肋骨骨折 [n = 1159]、正常 [n = 50])。在 1159 张急性肋骨骨折 CT 图像中,随机选取 9 张进行人工智能模型训练。测试了 150 张急性肋骨骨折 CT 图像和 50 张正常 CT 图像,并对剩余的 1000 张急性肋骨骨折 CT 图像进行了内部验证。我们研究了人工智能模型对急性肋骨骨折的存在和位置的诊断准确性和误差:结果:胸部 CT 图像诊断急性肋骨骨折的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值以及准确性分别为 93.3%、94%、97.9%、82.5% 和 95.6%。然而,急性肋骨骨折位置的准确率较低,仅为 76%(760/1000)。急性肋骨骨折诊断错误的原因似乎是考虑了处于同一位置的肩胛骨或锁骨(66%)或一些未被识别的肋骨(34%):诊断急性肋骨骨折的人工智能模型在检测是否存在急性肋骨骨折方面显示出较高的准确性,但对肋骨骨折确切位置的诊断则受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信