The Ethics of Genetic Testing for Inherited Cancer-Predisposing Genes.

Steven Sorscher, Alisha T Detroye
{"title":"The Ethics of Genetic Testing for Inherited Cancer-Predisposing Genes.","authors":"Steven Sorscher, Alisha T Detroye","doi":"10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Once an individual has been identified as a carrier of an inherited cancer-predisposing gene or pathogenic germline variant (PGV), there are measures that have been proven to prevent and diagnose the associated cancers at an earlier, more curable stage. Consequently, patients who are offered and undergo testing are afforded opportunities and health-care information that profoundly affect their lives and the lives of their family members who choose to be tested as well. For years, the debate over the controversial topic of whether all patients should be offered germline testing for cancer-predisposing PGVs centered around questions of the analytical sensitivity of the assays (i.e., the ability of the test to correctly identify those who carry a PGV), legal implications for those identified as PGV carriers, cost to the health-care system, and the uncertain management implications of test results. Currently, the standard of care is to offer testing to individuals where the anticipated benefits of testing outweigh the harms. Here, the ethical question of whether all patients have the right to testing for PGVs is considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":94110,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology","volume":"15 2","pages":"137-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11308536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Once an individual has been identified as a carrier of an inherited cancer-predisposing gene or pathogenic germline variant (PGV), there are measures that have been proven to prevent and diagnose the associated cancers at an earlier, more curable stage. Consequently, patients who are offered and undergo testing are afforded opportunities and health-care information that profoundly affect their lives and the lives of their family members who choose to be tested as well. For years, the debate over the controversial topic of whether all patients should be offered germline testing for cancer-predisposing PGVs centered around questions of the analytical sensitivity of the assays (i.e., the ability of the test to correctly identify those who carry a PGV), legal implications for those identified as PGV carriers, cost to the health-care system, and the uncertain management implications of test results. Currently, the standard of care is to offer testing to individuals where the anticipated benefits of testing outweigh the harms. Here, the ethical question of whether all patients have the right to testing for PGVs is considered.

遗传性癌症易感基因基因检测的伦理问题。
一旦一个人被确定为遗传性癌症易感基因或致病性种系变异(PGV)携带者,有一些措施已被证明可以在更早、更可治愈的阶段预防和诊断相关癌症。因此,接受检测的患者将获得机会和医疗保健信息,这将对他们的生活以及选择接受检测的家庭成员的生活产生深远影响。多年来,关于是否应为所有患者提供癌症易感基因的种系检测这一争议性话题的争论主要集中在检测方法的分析灵敏度(即检测正确识别癌症易感基因携带者的能力)、被确定为癌症易感基因携带者的法律影响、医疗保健系统的成本以及检测结果的不确定性管理影响等问题上。目前的医疗标准是,如果检测的预期益处大于弊端,则为个人提供检测。在此,我们将考虑是否所有患者都有权接受 PGV 检测这一伦理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信