{"title":"Machine-Learning Models Reliably Predict Clinical Outcomes in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.","authors":"Hongwei Zhan, Xin Kang, Xiaobo Zhang, Yuji Zhang, Yanming Wang, Jing Yang, Kun Zhang, Jingjing Han, Zhiwei Feng, Liang Zhang, Meng Wu, Yayi Xia, Jin Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a machine-learning model to predict clinical outcomes after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) and identify the important predictive indicators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients who underwent MPFLR from January 2018 to December 2022. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) concurrent bony procedures, (2) history of other knee surgeries, and (3) follow-up period of less than 12 months. Forty-two predictive models were constructed for 7 clinical outcomes (failure to achieve minimum clinically important difference of clinical scores, return to preinjury sports, pivoting sports, and recurrent instability) using 6 machine-learning algorithms (random forest, logistic regression, support vector machine, decision tree, implemented multilayer perceptron, and K-nearest neighbor). The performance of the model was evaluated using metrics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. In addition, SHapley Additive exPlanation summary plot was employed to identify the important predictive factors of the best-performing model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 218 patients met criteria. For the best-performing models in predicting failure to achieve the minimum clinically important difference for Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee, Kujala, and Tegner scores, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves and accuracies were 0.884 (good) and 87.3%, 0.859 (good) and 86.2%, 0.969 (excellent) and 97.0%, and 0.760 (fair) and 76.8%, respectively; 0.952 (excellent) and 95.2% for return to preinjury sports; 0.756 (fair) and 75.4% for return to pivoting sports; and 0.943 (excellent) and 94.9% for recurrent instability. Low preoperative Tegner score, shorter time to surgery, and absence of severe trochlear dysplasia were significant predictors for return to preinjury sports, whereas the absence of severe trochlear dysplasia and patellar alta were significant predictors for return to pivoting sports. Older age, female sex, and low preoperative Lysholm score were highly predictive of recurrent instability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The predictive models developed using machine-learning algorithms can reliably forecast the clinical outcomes of MPFLR, particularly demonstrating excellent performance in predicting recurrent instability.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, case-control study.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a machine-learning model to predict clinical outcomes after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) and identify the important predictive indicators.
Methods: This study included patients who underwent MPFLR from January 2018 to December 2022. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) concurrent bony procedures, (2) history of other knee surgeries, and (3) follow-up period of less than 12 months. Forty-two predictive models were constructed for 7 clinical outcomes (failure to achieve minimum clinically important difference of clinical scores, return to preinjury sports, pivoting sports, and recurrent instability) using 6 machine-learning algorithms (random forest, logistic regression, support vector machine, decision tree, implemented multilayer perceptron, and K-nearest neighbor). The performance of the model was evaluated using metrics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. In addition, SHapley Additive exPlanation summary plot was employed to identify the important predictive factors of the best-performing model.
Results: A total of 218 patients met criteria. For the best-performing models in predicting failure to achieve the minimum clinically important difference for Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee, Kujala, and Tegner scores, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves and accuracies were 0.884 (good) and 87.3%, 0.859 (good) and 86.2%, 0.969 (excellent) and 97.0%, and 0.760 (fair) and 76.8%, respectively; 0.952 (excellent) and 95.2% for return to preinjury sports; 0.756 (fair) and 75.4% for return to pivoting sports; and 0.943 (excellent) and 94.9% for recurrent instability. Low preoperative Tegner score, shorter time to surgery, and absence of severe trochlear dysplasia were significant predictors for return to preinjury sports, whereas the absence of severe trochlear dysplasia and patellar alta were significant predictors for return to pivoting sports. Older age, female sex, and low preoperative Lysholm score were highly predictive of recurrent instability.
Conclusions: The predictive models developed using machine-learning algorithms can reliably forecast the clinical outcomes of MPFLR, particularly demonstrating excellent performance in predicting recurrent instability.
期刊介绍:
Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.