Hip Circumferential Labral Reconstruction Provides Similar Distractive Stability to Labral Repair After Cam Over-Resection in a Biomechanical Model.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Alexander J Hoffer, Stefan A St George, Brent A Lanting, Ryan M Degen, K C Geoffrey Ng
{"title":"Hip Circumferential Labral Reconstruction Provides Similar Distractive Stability to Labral Repair After Cam Over-Resection in a Biomechanical Model.","authors":"Alexander J Hoffer, Stefan A St George, Brent A Lanting, Ryan M Degen, K C Geoffrey Ng","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the change in hip distractive stability after a cam over-resection, labral tear, repair, labrectomy, or circumferential 6- or 10-mm labral reconstruction in a biomechanical model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten fresh-frozen matched-pair human cadaveric hips were analyzed using a materials testing system to measure the force and distance required to disrupt the suction seal of the hip (1) with an intact capsule and labrum; (2) after a capsulectomy and labral repair; (3) after a capsulectomy, 5-mm cam over-resection and labral repair; (4) after a capsulectomy, 5-mm cam over-resection and labral tear; (5) after a capsulectomy, 5-mm cam over-resection and labrectomy; and (6) after a capsulectomy, 5-mm cam over-resection and a 6- or 10-mm circumferential labral reconstruction with iliotibial band (5 hips each). Each specimen was retested at 0° flexion, 45° flexion, and 45° flexion and at 15° internal rotation and analyzed using nonparametric statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Friedman test of differences was significant among structural conditions and hip positions (P = .001). In all positions, the resistive force that opposed the disruption of the suction seal in an intact hip was significantly greater compared with all other conditions. The resistive force for the capsulectomy, 5-mm cam over-resection and labrectomy condition was significantly less compared with almost all other conditions and hip positions. A qualitative suction seal was achieved in 20% of hip specimens with a 6-mm labral reconstruction, whereas a seal was in achieved 60% of specimens with a 10-mm labral reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After a cam over-resection, a circumferential labral reconstruction improves the distractive stability of a labral deficient hip, comparable to a labral repair or tear in a biomechanical model.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Circumferential labral reconstruction may be a viable treatment option for patients with ongoing symptoms after hip arthroscopy with evidence of a cam over-resection and a deficient labrum.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the change in hip distractive stability after a cam over-resection, labral tear, repair, labrectomy, or circumferential 6- or 10-mm labral reconstruction in a biomechanical model.

Methods: Ten fresh-frozen matched-pair human cadaveric hips were analyzed using a materials testing system to measure the force and distance required to disrupt the suction seal of the hip (1) with an intact capsule and labrum; (2) after a capsulectomy and labral repair; (3) after a capsulectomy, 5-mm cam over-resection and labral repair; (4) after a capsulectomy, 5-mm cam over-resection and labral tear; (5) after a capsulectomy, 5-mm cam over-resection and labrectomy; and (6) after a capsulectomy, 5-mm cam over-resection and a 6- or 10-mm circumferential labral reconstruction with iliotibial band (5 hips each). Each specimen was retested at 0° flexion, 45° flexion, and 45° flexion and at 15° internal rotation and analyzed using nonparametric statistical methods.

Results: The Friedman test of differences was significant among structural conditions and hip positions (P = .001). In all positions, the resistive force that opposed the disruption of the suction seal in an intact hip was significantly greater compared with all other conditions. The resistive force for the capsulectomy, 5-mm cam over-resection and labrectomy condition was significantly less compared with almost all other conditions and hip positions. A qualitative suction seal was achieved in 20% of hip specimens with a 6-mm labral reconstruction, whereas a seal was in achieved 60% of specimens with a 10-mm labral reconstruction.

Conclusions: After a cam over-resection, a circumferential labral reconstruction improves the distractive stability of a labral deficient hip, comparable to a labral repair or tear in a biomechanical model.

Clinical relevance: Circumferential labral reconstruction may be a viable treatment option for patients with ongoing symptoms after hip arthroscopy with evidence of a cam over-resection and a deficient labrum.

在生物力学模型中,凸轮过度切除后的髋关节环状韧带重建术与韧带修复术具有相似的分散稳定性。
目的:在生物力学模型中评估凸轮过度切除、唇撕裂、修复、唇切除术或圆周6毫米或10毫米唇重建术后髋关节牵张稳定性的变化:使用材料测试系统分析了 10 个新鲜冷冻的配对人体尸体髋关节,以测量破坏髋关节吸力密封所需的力和距离:(1) 完整的关节囊和唇囊,(2) 关节囊切除术和唇囊修复术后,(3) 关节囊切除术后、(4)髋关节帽切除术、5 毫米凸轮过度切除术和唇囊撕裂术后;(5)髋关节帽切除术、5 毫米凸轮过度切除术和唇囊切除术后;(6)髋关节帽切除术、5 毫米凸轮过度切除术和 6 毫米或 10 毫米髂胫带环绕唇囊重建术后(各 5 个髋关节)。每个标本在屈曲 0°、屈曲 45°、屈曲 45°和内旋 15°时进行复测,并使用非参数统计方法进行分析:结构条件和髋关节位置之间的弗里德曼检验差异显著(P = 0.001)。在所有体位中,完整髋关节中阻挡吸力密封破坏的阻力明显大于所有其他条件。与几乎所有其他情况和髋关节位置相比,髋帽切除术、5 毫米凸轮过度切除术和唇切除术情况下的阻力明显较小。20%的髋关节标本采用6毫米唇瓣重建,而60%的髋关节标本采用10毫米唇瓣重建:结论:在凸轮过度切除后,环形唇瓣重建可改善唇瓣缺损髋关节的牵张稳定性,与生物力学模型中的唇瓣修复或撕裂效果相当:临床意义:对于髋关节镜检查后症状持续存在、有证据显示凸轮过度切除和唇缺损的患者,环形唇重建可能是一种可行的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信