Evaluating ChatGPT responses to frequently asked patient questions regarding periprosthetic joint infection after total hip and knee arthroplasty.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-08-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076241272620
Xiaojun Hu, Marcel Niemann, Arne Kienzle, Karl Braun, David Alexander Back, Clemens Gwinner, Nora Renz, Ulrich Stoeckle, Andrej Trampuz, Sebastian Meller
{"title":"Evaluating ChatGPT responses to frequently asked patient questions regarding periprosthetic joint infection after total hip and knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Xiaojun Hu, Marcel Niemann, Arne Kienzle, Karl Braun, David Alexander Back, Clemens Gwinner, Nora Renz, Ulrich Stoeckle, Andrej Trampuz, Sebastian Meller","doi":"10.1177/20552076241272620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients access relevant information concerning their orthopaedic surgery resources through multiple information channels before presenting for clinical treatment. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbots have become another source of information for patients. The currently developed AI chat technology ChatGPT (OpenAI LP) is an application for such purposes and it has been rapidly gaining popularity, including for patient education. This study sought to evaluate whether ChatGPT can correctly answer frequently asked questions (FAQ) regarding periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve FAQs about PJI after hip and knee arthroplasty were identified from the websites of fifteen international clinical expert centres. ChatGPT was confronted with these questions and its responses were analysed for their accuracy using an evidence-based approach by a multidisciplinary team. Responses were categorised in four groups: (1) Excellent response that did not require additional improvement; (2) Satisfactory responses that required a small amount of improvement; (3) Satisfactory responses that required moderate improvement; and (4) Unsatisfactory responses that required a large amount of improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the analysis of the responses given by the chatbot, no reply received an 'unsatisfactory' rating; one did not require any correction; and the majority of the responses required low (7 out of 12) or moderate (4 out of 12) clarification. Although a few responses required minimal clarification, the chatbot responses were generally unbiased and evidence-based, even when asked controversial questions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AI-chatbot ChatGPT was able to effectively answer the FAQs of patients seeking information around PJI diagnosis and treatment. The given information was also written in a manner that can be assumed to be understandable by patients. The chatbot could be a valuable clinical tool for patient education and understanding around PJI treatment in the future. Further studies should evaluate its use and acceptance by patients with PJI.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11311159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241272620","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients access relevant information concerning their orthopaedic surgery resources through multiple information channels before presenting for clinical treatment. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbots have become another source of information for patients. The currently developed AI chat technology ChatGPT (OpenAI LP) is an application for such purposes and it has been rapidly gaining popularity, including for patient education. This study sought to evaluate whether ChatGPT can correctly answer frequently asked questions (FAQ) regarding periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

Methods: Twelve FAQs about PJI after hip and knee arthroplasty were identified from the websites of fifteen international clinical expert centres. ChatGPT was confronted with these questions and its responses were analysed for their accuracy using an evidence-based approach by a multidisciplinary team. Responses were categorised in four groups: (1) Excellent response that did not require additional improvement; (2) Satisfactory responses that required a small amount of improvement; (3) Satisfactory responses that required moderate improvement; and (4) Unsatisfactory responses that required a large amount of improvement.

Results: From the analysis of the responses given by the chatbot, no reply received an 'unsatisfactory' rating; one did not require any correction; and the majority of the responses required low (7 out of 12) or moderate (4 out of 12) clarification. Although a few responses required minimal clarification, the chatbot responses were generally unbiased and evidence-based, even when asked controversial questions.

Conclusions: The AI-chatbot ChatGPT was able to effectively answer the FAQs of patients seeking information around PJI diagnosis and treatment. The given information was also written in a manner that can be assumed to be understandable by patients. The chatbot could be a valuable clinical tool for patient education and understanding around PJI treatment in the future. Further studies should evaluate its use and acceptance by patients with PJI.

评估 ChatGPT 对患者关于全髋关节和膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染常见问题的回复。
背景:患者在接受临床治疗前会通过多种信息渠道获取骨科手术资源的相关信息。最近,人工智能(AI)驱动的聊天机器人已成为患者的另一个信息来源。目前开发的人工智能聊天技术 ChatGPT(OpenAI LP)就是一款用于此类目的的应用程序,它在患者教育等方面迅速普及。本研究旨在评估 ChatGPT 能否正确回答有关假体周围关节感染(PJI)的常见问题(FAQ):从 15 个国际临床专家中心的网站上确定了 12 个有关髋关节和膝关节置换术后 PJI 的常见问题。ChatGPT 面对这些问题,由一个多学科团队采用循证方法对其答复的准确性进行了分析。答复分为四类:(1) 不需要额外改进的优秀答复;(2) 需要少量改进的满意答复;(3) 需要适度改进的满意答复;(4) 需要大量改进的不满意答复:通过对聊天机器人给出的回复进行分析,没有一个回复获得 "不满意 "评级;一个回复不需要任何更正;大多数回复需要少量(12 个中有 7 个)或适度(12 个中有 4 个)的说明。虽然有几个回复只需要极少的澄清,但聊天机器人的回复一般都不带偏见并以证据为基础,即使在问到有争议的问题时也是如此:结论:人工智能聊天机器人 "ChatGPT "能够有效地回答患者在PJI诊断和治疗方面的常见问题。所提供信息的编写方式也能让患者理解。未来,聊天机器人可能会成为一种宝贵的临床工具,用于患者教育和了解有关 PJI 治疗的信息。进一步的研究应评估 PJI 患者对聊天机器人的使用和接受程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信