Improving emergency department flow by introducing four interventions simultaneously. A quality improvement project

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
{"title":"Improving emergency department flow by introducing four interventions simultaneously. A quality improvement project","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Emergency department (ED) crowding is a widespread issue with adverse effects on patient care and outcomes.</p><p><em>Local problem:</em> ED crowding exacerbates wait times and compromises patient care, prompting opportunities for internal process improvement.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Over one week, the ED flow project team implemented four interventions, including an additional triage station, to optimize patient flow. We compared triage times, length of stay, crowding levels, and patient experiences with two control periods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During peak hours, waiting times to triage decreased significantly with a median of 20 min (IQR 15–30) in the project week and 26 min (IQR 18–37) in the control weeks. Self-referrals decreased, while general practitioner referrals remained unchanged. Individual patient length of stay was unaffected, but crowding reduced notably during the project week. We found no difference in patient experiences between the periods.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The interventions contributed to reduced crowding and improved patient flow. The dedication of the ED flow project team and the ED nurses was crucial to these outcomes. An additional triage station during peak hours in the ED was established as a structural change.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48914,"journal":{"name":"International Emergency Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X24000946/pdfft?md5=d7827f54f421ee259a0ee532b505586b&pid=1-s2.0-S1755599X24000946-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X24000946","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Emergency department (ED) crowding is a widespread issue with adverse effects on patient care and outcomes.

Local problem: ED crowding exacerbates wait times and compromises patient care, prompting opportunities for internal process improvement.

Method

Over one week, the ED flow project team implemented four interventions, including an additional triage station, to optimize patient flow. We compared triage times, length of stay, crowding levels, and patient experiences with two control periods.

Results

During peak hours, waiting times to triage decreased significantly with a median of 20 min (IQR 15–30) in the project week and 26 min (IQR 18–37) in the control weeks. Self-referrals decreased, while general practitioner referrals remained unchanged. Individual patient length of stay was unaffected, but crowding reduced notably during the project week. We found no difference in patient experiences between the periods.

Conclusion

The interventions contributed to reduced crowding and improved patient flow. The dedication of the ED flow project team and the ED nurses was crucial to these outcomes. An additional triage station during peak hours in the ED was established as a structural change.

通过同时引入四项干预措施改善急诊科流程。质量改进项目。
背景:急诊科(ED)拥挤是一个普遍存在的问题,对患者护理和治疗效果产生了不利影响。当地问题:急诊科拥挤加剧了等待时间,影响了患者护理,为内部流程改进提供了机会:在一周的时间里,急诊室人流项目小组实施了四项干预措施,包括增设一个分诊站,以优化患者流量。我们将分诊时间、住院时间、拥挤程度和患者体验与两个对照期进行了比较:结果:在高峰时段,分诊等候时间明显缩短,项目周的中位数为 20 分钟(IQR 15-30),对照周的中位数为 26 分钟(IQR 18-37)。自我转诊人数减少,而普通医生转诊人数保持不变。单个病人的住院时间未受影响,但拥挤现象在项目周明显减少。我们发现不同时期的病人就医体验没有差别:结论:干预措施有助于减少拥挤和改善患者流量。急诊室流程项目团队和急诊室护士的奉献精神对取得这些成果至关重要。作为一项结构性改革,在急诊室高峰时段增设了一个分流站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: International Emergency Nursing is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to nurses and other professionals involved in emergency care. It aims to promote excellence through dissemination of high quality research findings, specialist knowledge and discussion of professional issues that reflect the diversity of this field. With an international readership and authorship, it provides a platform for practitioners worldwide to communicate and enhance the evidence-base of emergency care. The journal publishes a broad range of papers, from personal reflection to primary research findings, created by first-time through to reputable authors from a number of disciplines. It brings together research from practice, education, theory, and operational management, relevant to all levels of staff working in emergency care settings worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信