The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) scale in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: psychometric properties and clinically meaningful thresholds for interpretation.

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
David Cella, Christine de la Loge, Fatoumata Fofana, Shien Guo, Alicia Ellis, Carmen Fleurinck, Ute Massow, Maxime Dougados, Victoria Navarro-Compán, Jessica A Walsh
{"title":"The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) scale in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: psychometric properties and clinically meaningful thresholds for interpretation.","authors":"David Cella, Christine de la Loge, Fatoumata Fofana, Shien Guo, Alicia Ellis, Carmen Fleurinck, Ute Massow, Maxime Dougados, Victoria Navarro-Compán, Jessica A Walsh","doi":"10.1186/s41687-024-00769-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fatigue is an important symptom for most patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The FACIT-Fatigue is a 13-item patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument that has been used in axSpA clinical trials to measure fatigue severity and impact on daily activities. However, the psychometric properties of the FACIT-Fatigue are not fully evaluated across the entire spectrum of axSpA including non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) and radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA). This study determined: (1) the psychometric properties of the FACIT-Fatigue in nr-axSpA, r-axSpA, and the broad axSpA population and (2) FACIT-Fatigue scores representing meaningful within-patient change (MWPC), meaningful between-group differences, and cross-sectional severity bands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from two Phase 3 trials in adults with nr-axSpA (BE MOBILE 1; N = 254) and r-axSpA (BE MOBILE 2; N = 332) were analyzed pooled and separately to assess the psychometric properties of the FACIT-Fatigue. MWPC and meaningful between-group difference estimates were derived using anchor-based and distribution-based methods. Cross-sectional fatigue severity bands were estimated using logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FACIT-Fatigue presented good internal consistency, adequate convergent and known-groups validity, and was sensitive to change over time across the full axSpA spectrum. A 5-11-point increase in FACIT-Fatigue score was estimated to represent a MWPC, with an 8-point increase selected as the responder definition. A 2.14-5.34-point difference in FACIT-Fatigue score change over a 16-week period was estimated to represent a small-to-medium meaningful between-group difference. FACIT-Fatigue score severity bands were defined as: none or minimal (>40), mild (>30 to ≤40), moderate (>21 to ≤30), and severe (≤21).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support the use of the FACIT-Fatigue as a fit-for-purpose measure to assess fatigue-related treatment benefit in axSpA clinical trials. The proposed score estimates and thresholds can guide FACIT-Fatigue score interpretation across the full axSpA spectrum.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.Gov, NCT03928704. Registered 26 April 2019-Retrospectively registered, https://classic.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov/ct2/show/NCT03928704 .</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>Gov, NCT03928743. Registered 26 April 2019-Retrospectively registered, https://classic.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov/ct2/show/NCT03928743 .</p>","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11319684/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00769-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fatigue is an important symptom for most patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The FACIT-Fatigue is a 13-item patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument that has been used in axSpA clinical trials to measure fatigue severity and impact on daily activities. However, the psychometric properties of the FACIT-Fatigue are not fully evaluated across the entire spectrum of axSpA including non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) and radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA). This study determined: (1) the psychometric properties of the FACIT-Fatigue in nr-axSpA, r-axSpA, and the broad axSpA population and (2) FACIT-Fatigue scores representing meaningful within-patient change (MWPC), meaningful between-group differences, and cross-sectional severity bands.

Methods: Data from two Phase 3 trials in adults with nr-axSpA (BE MOBILE 1; N = 254) and r-axSpA (BE MOBILE 2; N = 332) were analyzed pooled and separately to assess the psychometric properties of the FACIT-Fatigue. MWPC and meaningful between-group difference estimates were derived using anchor-based and distribution-based methods. Cross-sectional fatigue severity bands were estimated using logistic regression analysis.

Results: The FACIT-Fatigue presented good internal consistency, adequate convergent and known-groups validity, and was sensitive to change over time across the full axSpA spectrum. A 5-11-point increase in FACIT-Fatigue score was estimated to represent a MWPC, with an 8-point increase selected as the responder definition. A 2.14-5.34-point difference in FACIT-Fatigue score change over a 16-week period was estimated to represent a small-to-medium meaningful between-group difference. FACIT-Fatigue score severity bands were defined as: none or minimal (>40), mild (>30 to ≤40), moderate (>21 to ≤30), and severe (≤21).

Conclusions: These findings support the use of the FACIT-Fatigue as a fit-for-purpose measure to assess fatigue-related treatment benefit in axSpA clinical trials. The proposed score estimates and thresholds can guide FACIT-Fatigue score interpretation across the full axSpA spectrum.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.Gov, NCT03928704. Registered 26 April 2019-Retrospectively registered, https://classic.

Clinicaltrials: gov/ct2/show/NCT03928704 .

Clinicaltrials: Gov, NCT03928743. Registered 26 April 2019-Retrospectively registered, https://classic.

Clinicaltrials: gov/ct2/show/NCT03928743 .

轴性脊柱关节炎患者慢性疾病治疗功能评估--疲劳(FACIT-疲劳)量表:心理测量学特性和具有临床意义的解释阈值。
背景:疲劳是大多数轴性脊柱关节炎(axSpA)患者的一个重要症状。FACIT-疲劳是一种由 13 个项目组成的患者报告结果(PRO)工具,已被用于 axSpA 临床试验,以测量疲劳的严重程度和对日常活动的影响。然而,FACIT-Fatigue 的心理测量特性尚未在包括非放射学轴索硬化症(nr-axSpA)和放射学轴索硬化症(r-axSpA)在内的整个轴索硬化症范围内得到充分评估。本研究确定了:(1) FACIT-Fatigue 在 nr-axSpA、r-axSpA 和广泛 axSpA 患者中的心理计量特性;(2) 代表有意义的患者内部变化 (MWPC)、有意义的组间差异和横断面严重程度带的 FACIT-Fatigue 分数:对来自两项 3 期试验的数据进行汇总分析,分别评估 FACIT-Fatigue 的心理测量特性,试验对象分别为患有 nr-axSpA (BE MOBILE 1;N = 254)和 r-axSpA (BE MOBILE 2;N = 332)的成人。采用基于锚和基于分布的方法得出了 MWPC 和有意义的组间差异估计值。采用逻辑回归分析估算了横截面疲劳严重程度分段:结果:FACIT-疲劳具有良好的内部一致性、足够的收敛性和已知组的有效性,并且对整个 axSpA 范围内随时间变化的敏感性很高。据估计,FACIT-疲劳评分增加 5-11 分代表一次 MWPC,增加 8 分被选为响应者定义。据估计,在 16 周的时间内,FACIT-疲劳评分变化 2.14-5.34 分的差异代表有意义的小到中等组间差异。FACIT-疲劳评分的严重程度带定义为:无或最低(>40)、轻度(>30至≤40)、中度(>21至≤30)和重度(≤21):这些研究结果支持将 FACIT-Fatigue 作为一种合适的测量方法,用于评估 axSpA 临床试验中与疲劳相关的治疗获益。建议的评分估计值和阈值可指导整个 axSpA 范围内的 FACIT-Fatigue 评分解释:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.Gov,NCT03928704。2019年4月26日注册-回顾性注册,https://classic.Clinicaltrials:gov/ct2/show/NCT03928704 .Clinicaltrials:Gov,NCT03928743。注册时间为 2019 年 4 月 26 日-追溯注册,https://classic.Clinicaltrials: gov/ct2/show/NCT03928743 .
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信