Effect of differences in proximal neck angles on biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm based on fluid dynamics.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Vascular Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1177/17085381241273262
Yang-Yi-Jing Wang, Jie Chen, Dong-Yang Luo, Hui Chen, Zhi-He Deng, Meng-Zhi Chen, Si-Yuan Mi, Qian-Qian Xie, Qing-Qing Zou, Guo-Zuo Xiong, Guo-Shan Bi
{"title":"Effect of differences in proximal neck angles on biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm based on fluid dynamics.","authors":"Yang-Yi-Jing Wang, Jie Chen, Dong-Yang Luo, Hui Chen, Zhi-He Deng, Meng-Zhi Chen, Si-Yuan Mi, Qian-Qian Xie, Qing-Qing Zou, Guo-Zuo Xiong, Guo-Shan Bi","doi":"10.1177/17085381241273262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the effect of proximal neck angulation on the biomechanical indices of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and to investigate its impact on the risk of AAA rupture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CT angiography (CTA) data of patients with AAA from January 2015 to January 2022 were collected. Patients were divided into three groups based on the angle of the proximal neck: Group A (∠β ≤ 30°), Group B (30°<∠β ≤ 60°), and Group C (∠β > 60°). Biomechanical indices related to the rupture risk of AAA were analyzed using computational fluid dynamics modeling (CFD-Post) based on the collected data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group A showed slight turbulence in the AAA lumen with a mixed laminar flow pattern. Group B had a regular low-speed eddy line characterized by cross-flow dominated by lumen blood flow and turbulence. In Group C, a few turbulent lines appeared at the proximal neck, accompanied by eddy currents in the lumen expansion area following the AAA shape. Significant differences were found in peak wall stress, shear stress, and the maximum blood flow velocity impact among the three groups. The maximum blood flow velocity at the angle of the proximal neck impact indicated the influence of the proximal neck angle on the blood flow state in the lumen.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As the angle of the proximal neck increased, it caused stronger eddy currents and turbulent blood flow due to a high-speed area near the neck. The region with the largest diameter in the abdominal aortic aneurysm was prone to the highest stress, indicating a higher risk of rupture. The corner of the proximal neck experienced the greatest shear stress, potentially leading to endothelial injury and further enlargement of the aneurysm.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381241273262","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to analyze the effect of proximal neck angulation on the biomechanical indices of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and to investigate its impact on the risk of AAA rupture.

Methods: CT angiography (CTA) data of patients with AAA from January 2015 to January 2022 were collected. Patients were divided into three groups based on the angle of the proximal neck: Group A (∠β ≤ 30°), Group B (30°<∠β ≤ 60°), and Group C (∠β > 60°). Biomechanical indices related to the rupture risk of AAA were analyzed using computational fluid dynamics modeling (CFD-Post) based on the collected data.

Results: Group A showed slight turbulence in the AAA lumen with a mixed laminar flow pattern. Group B had a regular low-speed eddy line characterized by cross-flow dominated by lumen blood flow and turbulence. In Group C, a few turbulent lines appeared at the proximal neck, accompanied by eddy currents in the lumen expansion area following the AAA shape. Significant differences were found in peak wall stress, shear stress, and the maximum blood flow velocity impact among the three groups. The maximum blood flow velocity at the angle of the proximal neck impact indicated the influence of the proximal neck angle on the blood flow state in the lumen.

Conclusion: As the angle of the proximal neck increased, it caused stronger eddy currents and turbulent blood flow due to a high-speed area near the neck. The region with the largest diameter in the abdominal aortic aneurysm was prone to the highest stress, indicating a higher risk of rupture. The corner of the proximal neck experienced the greatest shear stress, potentially leading to endothelial injury and further enlargement of the aneurysm.

基于流体动力学的近端颈部角度差异对腹主动脉瘤生物力学的影响。
背景:本研究旨在分析近端颈部成角对腹主动脉瘤(AAA)生物力学指标的影响,并探讨其对AAA破裂风险的影响:收集2015年1月至2022年1月AAA患者的CT血管造影(CTA)数据。根据近端颈部的角度将患者分为三组:A组(∠β≤30°)、B组(30° 60°)。根据收集的数据,使用计算流体动力学模型(CFD-Post)分析了与 AAA 破裂风险相关的生物力学指标:结果:A 组 AAA 管腔内出现轻微湍流,呈混合层流模式。B 组有一条规则的低速涡流线,其特点是以腔内血流和湍流为主的交叉流。在 C 组中,近端颈部出现了几条湍流线,并伴随着根据 AAA 形状在管腔扩张区域出现的涡流。三组的峰值壁应力、剪切应力和最大血流速度影响存在显著差异。近端颈部角度影响下的最大血流速度表明近端颈部角度对管腔内血流状态的影响:结论:随着近端颈部角度的增大,颈部附近的高速区域会产生更强的涡流和湍流。腹主动脉瘤直径最大的区域容易受到最大的应力,表明破裂的风险较高。近端颈部一角承受的剪切应力最大,可能导致内皮损伤和动脉瘤进一步扩大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信