Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Epidural Hematoma after Lumbar Microendoscopic Laminotomy: The Utility of Ultrasonography versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

IF 1.2 Q3 SURGERY
Spine Surgery and Related Research Pub Date : 2024-02-14 eCollection Date: 2024-07-27 DOI:10.22603/ssrr.2023-0268
Shizumasa Murata, Hiroshi Iwasaki, Hiroshi Hashizume, Yasutsugu Yukawa, Akihito Minamide, Yukihiro Nakagawa, Shunji Tsutsui, Masanari Takami, Motohiro Okada, Keiji Nagata, Yuyu Ishimoto, Masatoshi Teraguchi, Hiroki Iwahashi, Kimihide Murakami, Ryo Taiji, Takuhei Kozaki, Yoji Kitano, Munehito Yoshida, Hiroshi Yamada
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Epidural Hematoma after Lumbar Microendoscopic Laminotomy: The Utility of Ultrasonography versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging.","authors":"Shizumasa Murata, Hiroshi Iwasaki, Hiroshi Hashizume, Yasutsugu Yukawa, Akihito Minamide, Yukihiro Nakagawa, Shunji Tsutsui, Masanari Takami, Motohiro Okada, Keiji Nagata, Yuyu Ishimoto, Masatoshi Teraguchi, Hiroki Iwahashi, Kimihide Murakami, Ryo Taiji, Takuhei Kozaki, Yoji Kitano, Munehito Yoshida, Hiroshi Yamada","doi":"10.22603/ssrr.2023-0268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative spinal epidural hematoma (PSEH) is a severe complication of spinal surgery that necessitates accurate and timely diagnosis. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of ultrasonography as an alternative diagnostic tool for PSEH after microendoscopic laminotomy (MEL) for lumbar spinal stenosis, comparing it with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 65 patients who underwent MEL were evaluated using both ultrasound- and MRI-based classifications for PSEH. Intra- and interrater reliabilities were analyzed. Furthermore, ethical standards were strictly followed, with spine surgeons certified by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association performing evaluations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 65 patients, 91 vertebral segments were assessed. The intra- and interrater agreements for PSEH classification were almost perfect for both ultrasound (κ=0.824 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.729-0.918] and κ=0.810 [95% CI 0.712-0.909], respectively) and MRI (κ=0.839 [95% CI 0.748-0.931] and κ=0.853 [95% CI 0.764-0.942], respectively). The results showed high concordance between ultrasound- and MRI-based classifications, validating the reliability of ultrasound in postoperative PSEH evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study presents a significant advancement by introducing ultrasound as a precise and practical alternative to MRI for PSEH evaluation. The comparable accuracy of ultrasound to MRI, rapid bedside assessments, and radiation-free nature make it valuable for routine postoperative evaluations. Despite the limitations related to specific surgical contexts and clinical outcome assessment, the clinical potential of ultrasound is evident. It offers clinicians a faster, cost-effective, and repeatable diagnostic option, potentially enhancing patient care. This study establishes the utility of ultrasound in evaluating postoperative spinal epidural hematomas after MEL. With high concordance to MRI, ultrasound emerges as a reliable, practical, and innovative tool, promising improved diagnostic efficiency and patient outcomes. Further studies should explore its clinical impact across diverse surgical scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":22253,"journal":{"name":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11310533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2023-0268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative spinal epidural hematoma (PSEH) is a severe complication of spinal surgery that necessitates accurate and timely diagnosis. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of ultrasonography as an alternative diagnostic tool for PSEH after microendoscopic laminotomy (MEL) for lumbar spinal stenosis, comparing it with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods: A total of 65 patients who underwent MEL were evaluated using both ultrasound- and MRI-based classifications for PSEH. Intra- and interrater reliabilities were analyzed. Furthermore, ethical standards were strictly followed, with spine surgeons certified by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association performing evaluations.

Results: Among the 65 patients, 91 vertebral segments were assessed. The intra- and interrater agreements for PSEH classification were almost perfect for both ultrasound (κ=0.824 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.729-0.918] and κ=0.810 [95% CI 0.712-0.909], respectively) and MRI (κ=0.839 [95% CI 0.748-0.931] and κ=0.853 [95% CI 0.764-0.942], respectively). The results showed high concordance between ultrasound- and MRI-based classifications, validating the reliability of ultrasound in postoperative PSEH evaluation.

Conclusions: This study presents a significant advancement by introducing ultrasound as a precise and practical alternative to MRI for PSEH evaluation. The comparable accuracy of ultrasound to MRI, rapid bedside assessments, and radiation-free nature make it valuable for routine postoperative evaluations. Despite the limitations related to specific surgical contexts and clinical outcome assessment, the clinical potential of ultrasound is evident. It offers clinicians a faster, cost-effective, and repeatable diagnostic option, potentially enhancing patient care. This study establishes the utility of ultrasound in evaluating postoperative spinal epidural hematomas after MEL. With high concordance to MRI, ultrasound emerges as a reliable, practical, and innovative tool, promising improved diagnostic efficiency and patient outcomes. Further studies should explore its clinical impact across diverse surgical scenarios.

腰椎显微内窥镜椎板切除术后硬膜外血肿的比较评估:超声波造影与磁共振成像的效用。
导言:术后脊柱硬膜外血肿(PSEH)是脊柱手术的一种严重并发症,需要准确及时的诊断。本研究旨在评估超声造影作为腰椎管狭窄症微内镜下椎板切开术(MEL)术后 PSEH 的替代诊断工具的准确性,并将其与磁共振成像(MRI)进行比较:共对 65 名接受 MEL 的患者进行了评估,采用超声和核磁共振成像对 PSEH 进行了分类。方法:共对 65 名接受 MEL 的患者进行了评估,采用超声和核磁共振成像对 PSEH 进行了分类,并分析了内部和相互之间的可靠性。此外,评估严格遵循道德标准,由日本骨科协会认证的脊柱外科医生进行:结果:在 65 名患者中,有 91 个椎体节段接受了评估。超声波(κ=0.824 [95% 置信区间 (CI) 0.729-0.918] 和 κ=0.810 [95% CI 0.712-0.909])和核磁共振成像(κ=0.839 [95% CI 0.748-0.931] 和 κ=0.853 [95% CI 0.764-0.942])对 PSEH 分类的校内和校际一致性几乎完美。结果显示,超声和磁共振成像的分类结果高度一致,验证了超声在术后 PSEH 评估中的可靠性:本研究将超声作为核磁共振成像评估 PSEH 的一种精确而实用的替代方法,是一项重大进展。超声波与核磁共振成像的准确性相当,床旁评估迅速,且无辐射,因此在常规术后评估中很有价值。尽管超声波在特定手术环境和临床结果评估方面存在局限性,但其临床潜力是显而易见的。它为临床医生提供了一种更快、更经济、可重复的诊断选择,有可能提高患者护理水平。本研究证实了超声波在评估 MEL 术后脊柱硬膜外血肿方面的实用性。超声与核磁共振成像的一致性很高,是一种可靠、实用和创新的工具,有望提高诊断效率和患者预后。进一步的研究应探讨其在不同手术情况下的临床影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信