A secukinumab dose-escalation study in patients with ankylosing spondylitis not achieving inactive disease after 16 weeks of treatment.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Atul Deodhar, Alan J Kivitz, Marina Magrey, Jessica A Walsh, Philip J Mease, Maria Greenwald, Farid Kianifard, Chelsea Elam, Gopi M Bommidi, Adam Winseck, Lianne S Gensler
{"title":"A secukinumab dose-escalation study in patients with ankylosing spondylitis not achieving inactive disease after 16 weeks of treatment.","authors":"Atul Deodhar, Alan J Kivitz, Marina Magrey, Jessica A Walsh, Philip J Mease, Maria Greenwald, Farid Kianifard, Chelsea Elam, Gopi M Bommidi, Adam Winseck, Lianne S Gensler","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keae432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the clinical response at week 52 in patients with AS who received secukinumab 300 vs 150 mg after inadequate response to 150 mg at week 16.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ASLeap (NCT03350815) was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 4 trial. After 16 weeks of open-label secukinumab 150 mg (Treatment Period 1), patients who did not achieve inactive disease [AS Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) <1.3] at both week 12 and 16 were considered to have an inadequate response and were randomized 1:1 to receive secukinumab 300 or 150 mg every 4 weeks until week 52 (Treatment Period 2). The primary efficacy variable was achievement of ASDAS <1.3 at week 52 using week 16 as baseline. Safety was evaluated by the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) through week 52.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 322 patients treated with secukinumab in Treatment Period 1, 207 (64.3%) had inadequate response. Similar proportions of patients with inadequate response randomized to secukinumab 300 mg (n = 101) and 150 mg (n = 105) in Treatment Period 2 completed the study (83.8% and 84.3%, respectively). At week 52, 8.8% and 6.7% of patients receiving secukinumab 300 and 150 mg, respectively, achieved ASDAS <1.3. The incidence of TEAEs was similar in both groups through week 52. No new safety signals were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with AS who did not achieve ASDAS <1.3 after receiving secukinumab 150 mg for 16 weeks experienced similar clinical response and safety through week 52 regardless of dose escalation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03350815.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"1864-1872"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11962956/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keae432","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical response at week 52 in patients with AS who received secukinumab 300 vs 150 mg after inadequate response to 150 mg at week 16.

Methods: ASLeap (NCT03350815) was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 4 trial. After 16 weeks of open-label secukinumab 150 mg (Treatment Period 1), patients who did not achieve inactive disease [AS Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) <1.3] at both week 12 and 16 were considered to have an inadequate response and were randomized 1:1 to receive secukinumab 300 or 150 mg every 4 weeks until week 52 (Treatment Period 2). The primary efficacy variable was achievement of ASDAS <1.3 at week 52 using week 16 as baseline. Safety was evaluated by the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) through week 52.

Results: Of 322 patients treated with secukinumab in Treatment Period 1, 207 (64.3%) had inadequate response. Similar proportions of patients with inadequate response randomized to secukinumab 300 mg (n = 101) and 150 mg (n = 105) in Treatment Period 2 completed the study (83.8% and 84.3%, respectively). At week 52, 8.8% and 6.7% of patients receiving secukinumab 300 and 150 mg, respectively, achieved ASDAS <1.3. The incidence of TEAEs was similar in both groups through week 52. No new safety signals were observed.

Conclusion: Patients with AS who did not achieve ASDAS <1.3 after receiving secukinumab 150 mg for 16 weeks experienced similar clinical response and safety through week 52 regardless of dose escalation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03350815.

一项针对强直性脊柱炎患者的secukinumab剂量递增研究,患者在接受16周治疗后病情仍未见好转。
目的研究强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者在第16周接受150毫克secukinumab治疗无效后,在第52周时接受secukinumab 300毫克与150毫克治疗的临床反应:ASLeap(NCT03350815)是一项随机、双盲、平行组、多中心、4期试验。在接受了16周的开放标签secukinumab 150毫克治疗后(治疗期1),未达到疾病非活动期(强直性脊柱炎疾病活动度评分[ASDAS]结果)的患者将不再接受治疗:在治疗期 1 接受 secukinumab 治疗的 322 名患者中,有 207 人(64.3%)反应不充分。在治疗期 2 随机接受 secukinumab 300 毫克(n = 101)和 150 毫克(n = 105)治疗的患者中,有类似比例的反应不足患者完成了研究(分别为 83.8% 和 84.3%)。在第52周,分别有8.8%和6.7%接受secukinumab 300毫克和150毫克治疗的患者达到了ASDAS结论:未达到ASDAS的强直性脊柱炎患者 试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03350815.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rheumatology
Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1091
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Rheumatology strives to support research and discovery by publishing the highest quality original scientific papers with a focus on basic, clinical and translational research. The journal’s subject areas cover a wide range of paediatric and adult rheumatological conditions from an international perspective. It is an official journal of the British Society for Rheumatology, published by Oxford University Press. Rheumatology publishes original articles, reviews, editorials, guidelines, concise reports, meta-analyses, original case reports, clinical vignettes, letters and matters arising from published material. The journal takes pride in serving the global rheumatology community, with a focus on high societal impact in the form of podcasts, videos and extended social media presence, and utilizing metrics such as Altmetric. Keep up to date by following the journal on Twitter @RheumJnl.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信