The Nurse-Implemented Chronotherapeutic Bundle in Critically Ill Children, RESTORE Resilience (R 2 ): Pilot Testing in a Two-Phase Cohort Study, 2017-2021.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000003595
Martha A Q Curley, Onella S Dawkins-Henry, Laura Beth Kalvas, Mallory A Perry-Eaddy, Georgia Georgostathi, Ian Yuan, David Wypij, Lisa A Asaro, Athena F Zuppa, Sapna R Kudchadkar
{"title":"The Nurse-Implemented Chronotherapeutic Bundle in Critically Ill Children, RESTORE Resilience (R 2 ): Pilot Testing in a Two-Phase Cohort Study, 2017-2021.","authors":"Martha A Q Curley, Onella S Dawkins-Henry, Laura Beth Kalvas, Mallory A Perry-Eaddy, Georgia Georgostathi, Ian Yuan, David Wypij, Lisa A Asaro, Athena F Zuppa, Sapna R Kudchadkar","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pilot test the nurse-led chronotherapeutic bundle in critically ill children, RESTORE Resilience (R 2 ).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A two-phase cohort study was carried out from 2017 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two similarly sized and organized PICUs in the United States.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Children 6 months to 17 years old who were mechanically ventilated for acute respiratory failure.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>R 2 seven-item chronotherapeutic bundle, including: 1) replication of child's pre-hospital daily routine (i.e., sleep/wake, feeding, activity patterns); 2) cycled day-night light/sound modulation; 3) minimal effective sedation; 4) night fasting with bolus enteral daytime feedings; 5) early progressive mobility; 6) nursing care continuity; and 7) parent diaries.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Children underwent environmental (light, sound) and patient (actigraphy, activity log, salivary melatonin, electroencephalogram) monitoring. Parents completed the Child's Daily Routine and Sleep Survey (CDRSS) and Family-Centered Care Scale. The primary outcome was post-extubation daytime activity consolidation (Daytime Activity Ratio Estimate [DARE]). Twenty baseline-phase (2017-2019) and 36 intervention-phase (2019-2021) participants were enrolled. During the intervention phase, nurses used the CDRSS to construct children's PICU schedules. Overall compliance with nurse-implemented R 2 elements 1-5 increased from 18% (interquartile range, 13-30%) at baseline to 63% (53-68%) during the intervention phase ( p < 0.001). Intervention participants were exposed to their pre-hospitalization daily routine ( p = 0.002), cycled day-night light/sound modulation ( p < 0.001), and early progressive mobility on more PICU days ( p = 0.02). Sedation target identification, enteral feeding schedules, and nursing care continuity did not differ between phases. Parent diaries were seldom used. DARE improved during the intervention phase and was higher pre-extubation (median 62% vs. 53%; p = 0.04) but not post-extubation (62% vs. 57%; p = 0.56).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the PICU, implementation of an individualized nurse-implemented chronotherapeutic bundle is feasible. Children who received the R 2 bundle had increased pre-extubation daytime activity consolidation compared to children receiving usual care. Given variation in protocol adherence, further R 2 testing should include interprofessional collaboration, pragmatic trial design, and implementation science strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1051-1064"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003595","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Pilot test the nurse-led chronotherapeutic bundle in critically ill children, RESTORE Resilience (R 2 ).

Design: A two-phase cohort study was carried out from 2017 to 2021.

Setting: Two similarly sized and organized PICUs in the United States.

Patients: Children 6 months to 17 years old who were mechanically ventilated for acute respiratory failure.

Interventions: R 2 seven-item chronotherapeutic bundle, including: 1) replication of child's pre-hospital daily routine (i.e., sleep/wake, feeding, activity patterns); 2) cycled day-night light/sound modulation; 3) minimal effective sedation; 4) night fasting with bolus enteral daytime feedings; 5) early progressive mobility; 6) nursing care continuity; and 7) parent diaries.

Measurements and main results: Children underwent environmental (light, sound) and patient (actigraphy, activity log, salivary melatonin, electroencephalogram) monitoring. Parents completed the Child's Daily Routine and Sleep Survey (CDRSS) and Family-Centered Care Scale. The primary outcome was post-extubation daytime activity consolidation (Daytime Activity Ratio Estimate [DARE]). Twenty baseline-phase (2017-2019) and 36 intervention-phase (2019-2021) participants were enrolled. During the intervention phase, nurses used the CDRSS to construct children's PICU schedules. Overall compliance with nurse-implemented R 2 elements 1-5 increased from 18% (interquartile range, 13-30%) at baseline to 63% (53-68%) during the intervention phase ( p < 0.001). Intervention participants were exposed to their pre-hospitalization daily routine ( p = 0.002), cycled day-night light/sound modulation ( p < 0.001), and early progressive mobility on more PICU days ( p = 0.02). Sedation target identification, enteral feeding schedules, and nursing care continuity did not differ between phases. Parent diaries were seldom used. DARE improved during the intervention phase and was higher pre-extubation (median 62% vs. 53%; p = 0.04) but not post-extubation (62% vs. 57%; p = 0.56).

Conclusions: In the PICU, implementation of an individualized nurse-implemented chronotherapeutic bundle is feasible. Children who received the R 2 bundle had increased pre-extubation daytime activity consolidation compared to children receiving usual care. Given variation in protocol adherence, further R 2 testing should include interprofessional collaboration, pragmatic trial design, and implementation science strategies.

重症儿童的护士实施慢性治疗捆绑疗法,RESTORE Resilience (R2):2017-2021年两阶段队列研究试点测试》。
目标在重症儿童中试点测试由护士主导的慢性治疗捆绑疗法--RESTORE Resilience (R2):设计:从2017年至2021年分两个阶段进行队列研究:美国两家规模和组织相似的重症监护病房:因急性呼吸衰竭接受机械通气的 6 个月至 17 岁儿童:干预措施:R2 七项慢性治疗捆绑疗法,包括干预措施:R2 七项慢性治疗包,包括:1)复制患儿入院前的日常生活(即睡眠/觉醒、喂食、活动模式);2)昼夜循环光/声调节;3)最低有效镇静;4)夜间禁食,日间栓剂肠内喂食;5)早期渐进式移动;6)护理连续性;7)家长日记:对儿童进行环境(光、声)和患者(行动计、活动记录、唾液褪黑激素、脑电图)监测。家长填写儿童日常作息和睡眠调查表(CDRSS)和以家庭为中心的护理量表。主要结果是拔管后日间活动巩固率(日间活动比率估计值 [DARE])。20名基线阶段(2017-2019年)和36名干预阶段(2019-2021年)参与者入选。在干预阶段,护士使用 CDRSS 制定儿童 PICU 计划表。对护士实施的 R2 要素 1-5 的总体依从性从基线时的 18%(四分位间范围,13-30%)提高到干预阶段的 63%(53-68%)(p < 0.001)。干预参与者在更多的 PICU 日间接触到了入院前的日常工作(p = 0.002)、昼夜循环灯光/声音调节(p < 0.001)和早期渐进式移动(p = 0.02)。各阶段的镇静目标识别、肠道喂养计划和护理连续性没有差异。家长日记很少使用。干预阶段的 DARE 有所改善,拔管前的 DARE 更高(中位数 62% 对 53%;p = 0.04),但拔管后的 DARE 不高(62% 对 57%;p = 0.56):结论:在重症监护病房,实施由护士执行的个体化慢性治疗捆绑方案是可行的。与接受常规护理的患儿相比,接受R2治疗包的患儿拔管前的日间活动巩固率有所提高。鉴于方案遵守情况的差异,进一步的 R2 测试应包括跨专业合作、实用试验设计和实施科学策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信