Research Letter: Retrograde Amnesia and Posttraumatic Amnesia in Service Members and Veterans With Remote History of TBI.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sara M Lippa, Kelly C Gillow, Lars D Hungerford, Jason M Bailie, Louis M French, Tracey A Brickell, Rael T Lange
{"title":"Research Letter: Retrograde Amnesia and Posttraumatic Amnesia in Service Members and Veterans With Remote History of TBI.","authors":"Sara M Lippa, Kelly C Gillow, Lars D Hungerford, Jason M Bailie, Louis M French, Tracey A Brickell, Rael T Lange","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The recently updated American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine diagnostic criteria for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) removed retrograde amnesia (RA) as a main criterion for mTBI, recommending it be included as a substitute criterion only when posttraumatic amnesia (PTA) cannot be reliably assessed. This study aimed to investigate the evidence base for this recommendation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Military treatment facility.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 752 US military service members/veterans (mean age = 36.1 years, SD = 9.4 years) with a history of TBI prospectively enrolled in the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center-Traumatic Brain Injury Center of Excellence 15-Year Longitudinal TBI study who sustained a total of 1015 TBIs with substantiated RA and PTA. Most participants were male (93.6%), not of Hispanic Origin (84.7%), and White (84.5%). Evaluations were conducted on average 7.6 years (SD = 6.9 years) after injury.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Case series.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Presence and duration of RA and PTA; and ratio of PTA and RA (PTA:RA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no TBIs where RA was present but PTA was absent. Within the 1015 TBIs, 896 (88.3%) involved both RA and PTA, 65 (6.4%) involved PTA only, and 54 (5.3%) did not involve RA or PTA. For the 635 TBI events with substantiated recorded minutes of RA and PTA both >0, the mean ratio of PTA:RA was 31:1. In only one instance was the ratio of PTA:RA <1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were no TBIs where RA was present without PTA. RA tended to be much shorter than PTA. Findings support the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine's decision to remove RA as a main criterion for mTBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000996","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The recently updated American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine diagnostic criteria for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) removed retrograde amnesia (RA) as a main criterion for mTBI, recommending it be included as a substitute criterion only when posttraumatic amnesia (PTA) cannot be reliably assessed. This study aimed to investigate the evidence base for this recommendation.

Setting: Military treatment facility.

Participants: A total of 752 US military service members/veterans (mean age = 36.1 years, SD = 9.4 years) with a history of TBI prospectively enrolled in the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center-Traumatic Brain Injury Center of Excellence 15-Year Longitudinal TBI study who sustained a total of 1015 TBIs with substantiated RA and PTA. Most participants were male (93.6%), not of Hispanic Origin (84.7%), and White (84.5%). Evaluations were conducted on average 7.6 years (SD = 6.9 years) after injury.

Design: Case series.

Main measures: Presence and duration of RA and PTA; and ratio of PTA and RA (PTA:RA).

Results: There were no TBIs where RA was present but PTA was absent. Within the 1015 TBIs, 896 (88.3%) involved both RA and PTA, 65 (6.4%) involved PTA only, and 54 (5.3%) did not involve RA or PTA. For the 635 TBI events with substantiated recorded minutes of RA and PTA both >0, the mean ratio of PTA:RA was 31:1. In only one instance was the ratio of PTA:RA <1.

Conclusion: There were no TBIs where RA was present without PTA. RA tended to be much shorter than PTA. Findings support the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine's decision to remove RA as a main criterion for mTBI.

研究信:有远程创伤性脑损伤病史的军人和退伍军人的逆行性遗忘症和创伤后遗忘症。
目的:最近更新的美国康复医学会轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)诊断标准取消了逆行性遗忘(RA)作为轻度创伤性脑损伤的主要标准,建议只有在无法可靠评估创伤后遗忘(PTA)时才将其作为替代标准。本研究旨在调查该建议的证据基础:地点:军事治疗机构:共有 752 名美国军人/退伍军人(平均年龄 = 36.1 岁,SD = 9.4 岁)参加了国防和退伍军人脑损伤中心--创伤性脑损伤卓越中心的 15 年纵向创伤性脑损伤研究,他们都有创伤性脑损伤病史,共遭受了 1015 次创伤性脑损伤,其中有确凿的 RA 和 PTA。大多数参与者为男性(93.6%)、非西班牙裔(84.7%)和白人(84.5%)。评估平均在伤后 7.6 年(SD = 6.9 年)进行:设计:病例系列:主要测量指标:RA和PTA的存在和持续时间;PTA和RA的比例(PTA:RA):结果:没有出现RA而无PTA的创伤性脑损伤。在 1015 例创伤性脑损伤中,896 例(88.3%)同时涉及 RA 和 PTA,65 例(6.4%)仅涉及 PTA,54 例(5.3%)未涉及 RA 或 PTA。在 635 起有确凿记录的 RA 和 PTA 分钟数均大于 0 的创伤性脑损伤事件中,PTA 与 RA 的平均比例为 31:1。只有一次 PTA:RA 的比例得出了结论:在所有创伤性脑损伤中,不存在 RA 而没有 PTA 的情况。RA 往往比 PTA 短得多。研究结果支持美国康复医学会的决定,即取消将 RA 作为 mTBI 的主要标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信