Comparison of Short-term and Long-term Outcomes after Different Reconstructions between Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic-assisted Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Retrospective Analysis at a High-volume Center.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2024-07-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.7150/jca.97786
Qingya Li, Mengpei Yan, Fengyuan Li, Zheng Li, Linjun Wang, Diancai Zhang, Hao Xu, Zekuan Xu, Sen Wang
{"title":"Comparison of Short-term and Long-term Outcomes after Different Reconstructions between Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic-assisted Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Retrospective Analysis at a High-volume Center.","authors":"Qingya Li, Mengpei Yan, Fengyuan Li, Zheng Li, Linjun Wang, Diancai Zhang, Hao Xu, Zekuan Xu, Sen Wang","doi":"10.7150/jca.97786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) have been subject to controversy with various reconstruction techniques of Billroth-I, Billroth-II, Roux-en-Y, and Uncut. This study aims to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of LADG and TLDG as well as the outcomes of different anastomoses. <b>Methods:</b> This study enrolled patients with gastric cancer at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (NMUH) between 2017 and 2021. Postoperative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo grade. Exclusion criteria included metachronous and synchronous malignancy and palliative surgery. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to assess 5-year prognosis between two groups. <b>Results</b>: This study included 1221 cases with an overall complication rate of 17.37% for LADG, which was significantly higher than TLDG's 10.72%. The incidence of anastomosis-related complications was 4.79% for LADG and 1.13% lower for TLDG. LADG and TLDG did not show significant difference for Grade III-V complications and resected lymph nodes. The postoperative stay was shorter for TLDG than LADG, and R-Y had a longer postoperative stay than B-II and Uncut after combining LADG and TLDG. The operation time was shorter in TLDG cases than that in LADG cases. The 5-year OS of the TLDG group was not significantly better than that of the LADG group. <b>Conclusion</b>: TLDG is superior in overall complication rate, anastomosis-related complication rate, postoperative stay and operation time to LADG. No difference of OS was observed between LADG and TLDG. Four anastomoses had no convincing evidence of being superior in complications rates, post-op stay, and harvested lymph nodes to each other.</p>","PeriodicalId":15183,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11310888/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.97786","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) have been subject to controversy with various reconstruction techniques of Billroth-I, Billroth-II, Roux-en-Y, and Uncut. This study aims to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of LADG and TLDG as well as the outcomes of different anastomoses. Methods: This study enrolled patients with gastric cancer at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (NMUH) between 2017 and 2021. Postoperative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo grade. Exclusion criteria included metachronous and synchronous malignancy and palliative surgery. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to assess 5-year prognosis between two groups. Results: This study included 1221 cases with an overall complication rate of 17.37% for LADG, which was significantly higher than TLDG's 10.72%. The incidence of anastomosis-related complications was 4.79% for LADG and 1.13% lower for TLDG. LADG and TLDG did not show significant difference for Grade III-V complications and resected lymph nodes. The postoperative stay was shorter for TLDG than LADG, and R-Y had a longer postoperative stay than B-II and Uncut after combining LADG and TLDG. The operation time was shorter in TLDG cases than that in LADG cases. The 5-year OS of the TLDG group was not significantly better than that of the LADG group. Conclusion: TLDG is superior in overall complication rate, anastomosis-related complication rate, postoperative stay and operation time to LADG. No difference of OS was observed between LADG and TLDG. Four anastomoses had no convincing evidence of being superior in complications rates, post-op stay, and harvested lymph nodes to each other.

完全腹腔镜远端胃切除术和腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术治疗胃癌的不同重建术后短期和长期疗效比较: 在一个高流量中心进行的回顾性分析。
背景:腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术(LADG)和全腹腔镜远端胃切除术(TLDG)的短期和长期疗效一直备受争议,其采用的重建技术包括Billroth-I、Billroth-II、Roux-en-Y和Uncut。本研究旨在比较 LADG 和 TLDG 的短期和长期疗效,以及不同吻合方式的疗效。研究方法本研究招募了2017年至2021年期间在南京医科大学第一附属医院(NMUH)就诊的胃癌患者。术后并发症根据Clavien-Dindo分级进行分类。排除标准包括合并恶性肿瘤、同步恶性肿瘤和姑息手术。采用卡普兰-梅耶尔分析法评估两组患者的5年预后。研究结果该研究共纳入1221例病例,LADG的总并发症发生率为17.37%,明显高于TLDG的10.72%。LADG 的吻合相关并发症发生率为 4.79%,TLDG 低 1.13%。在 III-V 级并发症和切除淋巴结方面,LADG 和 TLDG 没有明显差异。TLDG 的术后住院时间短于 LADG,而在 LADG 和 TLDG 联合术后,R-Y 的术后住院时间长于 B-II 和 Uncut。TLDG 的手术时间比 LADG 短。TLDG 组的 5 年 OS 并未明显优于 LADG 组。结论:TLDG 在总并发症发生率、吻合相关并发症发生率、术后住院时间和手术时间方面均优于 LADG。LADG 和 TLDG 的手术时间没有差异。四种吻合术在并发症发生率、术后住院时间和摘取淋巴结方面没有令人信服的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer
Journal of Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
333
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal with broad scope covering all areas of cancer research, especially novel concepts, new methods, new regimens, new therapeutic agents, and alternative approaches for early detection and intervention of cancer. The Journal is supported by an international editorial board consisting of a distinguished team of cancer researchers. Journal of Cancer aims at rapid publication of high quality results in cancer research while maintaining rigorous peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信