Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and hearing impairment: a disproportionality analysis using the US food and drug administration adverse event reporting system.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2386374
Min Luo, Tianqi Liu, Xiangtong Ye, Bingjie Xiao, Ruonan Gao, Ronghai Cui, Bin Wu
{"title":"Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and hearing impairment: a disproportionality analysis using the US food and drug administration adverse event reporting system.","authors":"Min Luo, Tianqi Liu, Xiangtong Ye, Bingjie Xiao, Ruonan Gao, Ronghai Cui, Bin Wu","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2386374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the association between phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) and hearing impairment adverse events (HIAEs) while providing an overview of the characteristics of drug-related HIAEs.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We conducted a detailed pharmacovigilance analysis using data from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, covering 2004 to 2022. By calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the information component (IC), we identified signals that indicate the association between PDE-5i use and HIAEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 191,398 reports related to PDE-5i, we identified 2,608 cases of HIAEs. Signals were observed for both PDE-5i monotherapy and polytherapy, indicating combinations of drugs. Avanafil exhibited the strongest signal (ROR: 4.35, 95% CI: 2.56-7.41, IC: 2.09, 95% CI: 0.10-3.51), while vardenafil showed the weakest signal (ROR: 2.69, 95% CI: 2.21-3.28, IC: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.74-2.04). Sildenafil had the highest reported cases (ROR: 3.03, 95% CI: 2.82-3.24, IC: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.34-1.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight a significant correlation between PDE-5i use and HIAEs, emphasizing the need for careful evaluation in clinical practice and providing appropriate guidance to patients before initiating treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1103-1111"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2386374","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate the association between phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) and hearing impairment adverse events (HIAEs) while providing an overview of the characteristics of drug-related HIAEs.

Research design and methods: We conducted a detailed pharmacovigilance analysis using data from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, covering 2004 to 2022. By calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the information component (IC), we identified signals that indicate the association between PDE-5i use and HIAEs.

Results: Among the 191,398 reports related to PDE-5i, we identified 2,608 cases of HIAEs. Signals were observed for both PDE-5i monotherapy and polytherapy, indicating combinations of drugs. Avanafil exhibited the strongest signal (ROR: 4.35, 95% CI: 2.56-7.41, IC: 2.09, 95% CI: 0.10-3.51), while vardenafil showed the weakest signal (ROR: 2.69, 95% CI: 2.21-3.28, IC: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.74-2.04). Sildenafil had the highest reported cases (ROR: 3.03, 95% CI: 2.82-3.24, IC: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.34-1.80).

Conclusion: These findings highlight a significant correlation between PDE-5i use and HIAEs, emphasizing the need for careful evaluation in clinical practice and providing appropriate guidance to patients before initiating treatment.

磷酸二酯酶-5 抑制剂与听力损伤:利用美国食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统进行的比例失调分析。
背景:本研究旨在调查磷酸二酯酶-5抑制剂(PDE-5i)与听力损伤不良事件(HIAEs)之间的关联,同时概述与药物相关的HIAEs的特征:我们利用美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中2004年至2022年的数据进行了详细的药物警戒分析。通过计算报告几率比(ROR)和信息成分(IC),我们确定了表明使用PDE-5i与HIAEs之间存在关联的信号:结果:在 191,398 份与 PDE-5i 相关的报告中,我们发现了 2,608 例 HIAEs。在 PDE-5i 单药治疗和多药治疗中都观察到了信号,表明存在药物组合。阿伐那非的信号最强(ROR:4.35,95% CI:2.56-7.41,IC:2.09,95% CI:0.10-3.51),而伐地那非的信号最弱(ROR:2.69,95% CI:2.21-3.28,IC:1.14,95% CI:0.74-2.04)。西地那非的报告病例数最多(ROR:3.03,95% CI:2.82-3.24,IC:1.57,95% CI:1.34-1.80):这些发现突显了 PDE-5i 的使用与 HIAEs 之间的显著相关性,强调了在临床实践中进行仔细评估的必要性,以及在开始治疗前为患者提供适当指导的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信