Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and hearing impairment: a disproportionality analysis using the US food and drug administration adverse event reporting system.
Min Luo, Tianqi Liu, Xiangtong Ye, Bingjie Xiao, Ruonan Gao, Ronghai Cui, Bin Wu
{"title":"Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and hearing impairment: a disproportionality analysis using the US food and drug administration adverse event reporting system.","authors":"Min Luo, Tianqi Liu, Xiangtong Ye, Bingjie Xiao, Ruonan Gao, Ronghai Cui, Bin Wu","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2386374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the association between phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) and hearing impairment adverse events (HIAEs) while providing an overview of the characteristics of drug-related HIAEs.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We conducted a detailed pharmacovigilance analysis using data from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, covering 2004 to 2022. By calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the information component (IC), we identified signals that indicate the association between PDE-5i use and HIAEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 191,398 reports related to PDE-5i, we identified 2,608 cases of HIAEs. Signals were observed for both PDE-5i monotherapy and polytherapy, indicating combinations of drugs. Avanafil exhibited the strongest signal (ROR: 4.35, 95% CI: 2.56-7.41, IC: 2.09, 95% CI: 0.10-3.51), while vardenafil showed the weakest signal (ROR: 2.69, 95% CI: 2.21-3.28, IC: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.74-2.04). Sildenafil had the highest reported cases (ROR: 3.03, 95% CI: 2.82-3.24, IC: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.34-1.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight a significant correlation between PDE-5i use and HIAEs, emphasizing the need for careful evaluation in clinical practice and providing appropriate guidance to patients before initiating treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1103-1111"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2386374","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to investigate the association between phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) and hearing impairment adverse events (HIAEs) while providing an overview of the characteristics of drug-related HIAEs.
Research design and methods: We conducted a detailed pharmacovigilance analysis using data from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, covering 2004 to 2022. By calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the information component (IC), we identified signals that indicate the association between PDE-5i use and HIAEs.
Results: Among the 191,398 reports related to PDE-5i, we identified 2,608 cases of HIAEs. Signals were observed for both PDE-5i monotherapy and polytherapy, indicating combinations of drugs. Avanafil exhibited the strongest signal (ROR: 4.35, 95% CI: 2.56-7.41, IC: 2.09, 95% CI: 0.10-3.51), while vardenafil showed the weakest signal (ROR: 2.69, 95% CI: 2.21-3.28, IC: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.74-2.04). Sildenafil had the highest reported cases (ROR: 3.03, 95% CI: 2.82-3.24, IC: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.34-1.80).
Conclusion: These findings highlight a significant correlation between PDE-5i use and HIAEs, emphasizing the need for careful evaluation in clinical practice and providing appropriate guidance to patients before initiating treatment.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports.
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.