The needs of patients with noncancer diseases and their families from hospital-based specialized palliative care teams in Japan.

4区 医学 Q2 Nursing
Hideki Kojima, Naomi Doi, Sanae Takanashi, Kaori Kinoshita, Rieko Inokuchi, Hidekazu Kato, Hiroki Mase, Tomoyasu Kinoshita, Atsuko Ito, Yumiko Iizuka, Ayano Ishikawa, Tatsuya Morita, Mitsunori Nishikawa
{"title":"The needs of patients with noncancer diseases and their families from hospital-based specialized palliative care teams in Japan.","authors":"Hideki Kojima, Naomi Doi, Sanae Takanashi, Kaori Kinoshita, Rieko Inokuchi, Hidekazu Kato, Hiroki Mase, Tomoyasu Kinoshita, Atsuko Ito, Yumiko Iizuka, Ayano Ishikawa, Tatsuya Morita, Mitsunori Nishikawa","doi":"10.21037/apm-24-42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital-based specialized palliative care teams (HSPC) are important for symptom management and ethics support, especially during complex decision-making, but the needs of patients with noncancer diseases and their families from the HSPC are unclear. This study aimed to (I) compare the prevalence of symptom between patients with and without cancer and explore changes in symptom intensity after HSPC consultation in patients with noncancer; (II) determine factors related to ethics support; and (III) compare the percentage of request contents from patients and their families when a certified nurse specialist in gerontological nursing (geriatric care nurse below) is present in the HSPC to that when a certified nurse specialist in palliative care (palliative care nurse below) is present in the HSPC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized a retrospective cohort study to analyze 761 patients (360 with noncancer and 401 with cancer) referred to our HSPC at the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology using 10-year data (since 2011) available in an electronic medical record database. (I) Symptom scores of the Support Team Assessment Schedule were compared between noncancer and cancer groups and between initial and 1-week assessments for noncancer patients. (II) Ethics support was compared between noncancer (including dementia) and cancer. The presence or absence of ethics support requests, which was set as the objective variable, was examined using logistic regression analysis. (III) The percentage of request contents selected from nine items defaulted on the electronic medical record when a geriatric care nurse was present in our HSPC were compared to those when a palliative care nurse was present in our HSPC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to those with cancer, patients with noncancer suffered more from dyspnea and sputum accumulation. More than 10% of patients with noncancer had suffered from pain, dyspnea, sputum accumulation, and anorexia that required treatment, with symptom scores showing improvement after 1 week of HSPC involvement, except for the sputum accumulation. Moreover, for anorexia, symptom scores improved, but >10% of these patients continued to suffer. Patients with noncancer diseases, including dementia, received ethics support than those with cancer without dementia. More requests for ethics support were received when a geriatric care nurse was in the HSPC than when a palliative care nurse was in the HSPC. Logistic regression analysis revealed that requests for ethics support were more frequent from patients or families with impaired decision-making capacity or when the patient lacked an advocate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The needs of patients with noncancer diseases and families from the HSPC in Japan included (I) symptom management for intractable conditions, such as sputum accumulation; (II) ethics support for patients with noncancer diseases, including dementia, with impaired decision-making capacity, and without advocates; and (III) advice on ethics issues from a geriatric care nurse.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-24-42","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospital-based specialized palliative care teams (HSPC) are important for symptom management and ethics support, especially during complex decision-making, but the needs of patients with noncancer diseases and their families from the HSPC are unclear. This study aimed to (I) compare the prevalence of symptom between patients with and without cancer and explore changes in symptom intensity after HSPC consultation in patients with noncancer; (II) determine factors related to ethics support; and (III) compare the percentage of request contents from patients and their families when a certified nurse specialist in gerontological nursing (geriatric care nurse below) is present in the HSPC to that when a certified nurse specialist in palliative care (palliative care nurse below) is present in the HSPC.

Methods: We utilized a retrospective cohort study to analyze 761 patients (360 with noncancer and 401 with cancer) referred to our HSPC at the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology using 10-year data (since 2011) available in an electronic medical record database. (I) Symptom scores of the Support Team Assessment Schedule were compared between noncancer and cancer groups and between initial and 1-week assessments for noncancer patients. (II) Ethics support was compared between noncancer (including dementia) and cancer. The presence or absence of ethics support requests, which was set as the objective variable, was examined using logistic regression analysis. (III) The percentage of request contents selected from nine items defaulted on the electronic medical record when a geriatric care nurse was present in our HSPC were compared to those when a palliative care nurse was present in our HSPC.

Results: Compared to those with cancer, patients with noncancer suffered more from dyspnea and sputum accumulation. More than 10% of patients with noncancer had suffered from pain, dyspnea, sputum accumulation, and anorexia that required treatment, with symptom scores showing improvement after 1 week of HSPC involvement, except for the sputum accumulation. Moreover, for anorexia, symptom scores improved, but >10% of these patients continued to suffer. Patients with noncancer diseases, including dementia, received ethics support than those with cancer without dementia. More requests for ethics support were received when a geriatric care nurse was in the HSPC than when a palliative care nurse was in the HSPC. Logistic regression analysis revealed that requests for ethics support were more frequent from patients or families with impaired decision-making capacity or when the patient lacked an advocate.

Conclusions: The needs of patients with noncancer diseases and families from the HSPC in Japan included (I) symptom management for intractable conditions, such as sputum accumulation; (II) ethics support for patients with noncancer diseases, including dementia, with impaired decision-making capacity, and without advocates; and (III) advice on ethics issues from a geriatric care nurse.

日本非癌症患者及其家属对医院专业姑息关怀团队的需求。
背景:以医院为基础的专业姑息关怀团队(HSPC)对于症状管理和伦理支持非常重要,尤其是在复杂的决策过程中,但非癌症患者及其家属对 HSPC 的需求尚不清楚。本研究旨在:(I)比较癌症患者和非癌症患者的症状发生率,并探讨非癌症患者在接受 HSPC 咨询后症状强度的变化;(II)确定与伦理支持相关的因素;(III)比较 HSPC 中有老年护理认证专科护士(以下简称老年护理专科护士)与姑息治疗认证专科护士(以下简称姑息治疗专科护士)时患者及其家属的请求内容比例:我们采用回顾性队列研究的方法,利用电子病历数据库中的 10 年数据(自 2011 年起),分析了转诊至国家老年医学和老年学中心 HSPC 的 761 名患者(360 名非癌症患者和 401 名癌症患者)。(I)比较了非癌症组和癌症组之间的支持团队评估表症状评分,以及非癌症患者初始评估和一周评估之间的症状评分。(II) 对非癌症患者(包括痴呆症患者)和癌症患者的伦理支持进行了比较。伦理支持请求的有无被设定为客观变量,通过逻辑回归分析进行检验。(III)比较了本中心有老年护理护士时与有姑息治疗护士时从电子病历默认的九个项目中选择的请求内容的百分比:与癌症患者相比,非癌症患者更容易出现呼吸困难和痰液积聚。10%以上的非癌症患者有需要治疗的疼痛、呼吸困难、痰液积聚和厌食症状,除痰液积聚外,其他症状评分在参与 HSPC 1 周后均有所改善。此外,在厌食方面,症状评分有所改善,但仍有超过 10% 的患者继续遭受痛苦。与没有痴呆症的癌症患者相比,患有痴呆症等非癌症疾病的患者获得了伦理支持。与姑息治疗护士相比,当老年护理护士在 HSPC 工作时,收到的伦理支持请求更多。逻辑回归分析表明,决策能力受损或缺乏辩护人的患者或家属更常提出伦理支持请求:日本非癌症患者和家属对 HSPC 的需求包括:(I) 顽固性疾病的症状管理,如痰液积聚;(II) 为非癌症患者提供伦理支持,包括痴呆症患者、决策能力受损的患者和没有辩护人的患者;(III) 老年护理护士就伦理问题提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of palliative medicine
Annals of palliative medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
231
期刊介绍: Annals of Palliative Medicine (Ann Palliat Med; Print ISSN 2224-5820; Online ISSN 2224-5839) is an open access, international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly with both online and printed copies since 2012. The aim of the journal is to provide up-to-date and cutting-edge information and professional support for health care providers in palliative medicine disciplines to improve the quality of life for patients and their families and caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信