Sex differences and long-term clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A SWEDEHEART study

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Michael Dismorr MD, PhD , Malin Granbom-Koski MD , Emma Ellfors MD , Andreas Rück MD, PhD , Magnus Settergren MD, PhD , Ulrik Sartipy MD, PhD , Natalie Glaser MD, PhD
{"title":"Sex differences and long-term clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A SWEDEHEART study","authors":"Michael Dismorr MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Malin Granbom-Koski MD ,&nbsp;Emma Ellfors MD ,&nbsp;Andreas Rück MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Magnus Settergren MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ulrik Sartipy MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Natalie Glaser MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.07.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Previous studies on the impact of sex differences after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have shown conflicting results. The aim was to analyze the risk of long-term mortality, heart failure hospitalization, myocardial infarction, stroke, bleeding and aortic valve reintervention in females versus males after TAVR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This nationwide, population-based cohort study included all patients who underwent TAVR in Sweden between 2008 and 2022 from the SWEDEHEART register. Additional baseline and outcome data were gathered from other national health data registers. Regression standardization was used to adjust for differences between the sexes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 10,475 patients, 4,886 (47%) were female and 5,589 (53%) were male. The mean age was 81 years. The cumulative incidence of mortality at 1, 5, and 10 years was 8% vs. 10%, 38% vs. 45%, and 75% vs. 82% for females and males, respectively. After regression standardization, the risk of all-cause mortality was lower for females (absolute difference at 10 years of 6.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4%-8.4%). The mean follow up was 3.1 years (maximum 14.1 years). Females also had a lower risk of major bleeding than males (absolute survival difference at 10 years of 4.0%, 95% CI 1.9%-6.2%), but there was no difference in the risk of heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, or reintervention between the sexes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Females had a higher survival rate and a lower bleeding risk than males after TAVR. Sex-specific factors are important to consider in the management of patients after TAVR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"277 ","pages":"Pages 27-38"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870324001856/pdfft?md5=5b1302f1172c5ee7cd700a4f3bab2c86&pid=1-s2.0-S0002870324001856-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870324001856","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Previous studies on the impact of sex differences after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have shown conflicting results. The aim was to analyze the risk of long-term mortality, heart failure hospitalization, myocardial infarction, stroke, bleeding and aortic valve reintervention in females versus males after TAVR.

Methods

This nationwide, population-based cohort study included all patients who underwent TAVR in Sweden between 2008 and 2022 from the SWEDEHEART register. Additional baseline and outcome data were gathered from other national health data registers. Regression standardization was used to adjust for differences between the sexes.

Results

Of 10,475 patients, 4,886 (47%) were female and 5,589 (53%) were male. The mean age was 81 years. The cumulative incidence of mortality at 1, 5, and 10 years was 8% vs. 10%, 38% vs. 45%, and 75% vs. 82% for females and males, respectively. After regression standardization, the risk of all-cause mortality was lower for females (absolute difference at 10 years of 6.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4%-8.4%). The mean follow up was 3.1 years (maximum 14.1 years). Females also had a lower risk of major bleeding than males (absolute survival difference at 10 years of 4.0%, 95% CI 1.9%-6.2%), but there was no difference in the risk of heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, or reintervention between the sexes.

Conclusions

Females had a higher survival rate and a lower bleeding risk than males after TAVR. Sex-specific factors are important to consider in the management of patients after TAVR.

Abstract Image

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的性别差异和长期临床疗效:SWEDEHEART 研究。
背景:以往关于经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后性别差异影响的研究结果相互矛盾。该研究旨在分析女性与男性在经导管主动脉瓣置换术后长期死亡、心衰住院、心肌梗死、中风、出血和主动脉瓣再介入的风险:这项基于人群的全国性队列研究纳入了SWEDEHEART登记册中2008年至2022年间在瑞典接受TAVR的所有患者。其他基线和结果数据来自其他国家的健康数据登记。回归标准化用于调整性别差异:在 10,475 名患者中,4,886 名(47%)为女性,5,589 名(53%)为男性。平均年龄为 81 岁。女性和男性在1年、5年和10年的累积死亡率分别为8% vs. 10%、38% vs. 45%和75% vs. 82%。回归标准化后,女性的全因死亡风险较低(10 年的绝对差异为 6.4%,95% 置信区间 [CI] 为 4.4%-8.4%)。平均随访时间为 3.1 年(最长 14.1 年)。女性发生大出血的风险也低于男性(10年的绝对存活率差异为4.0%,95% CI为1.9%-6.2%),但男女发生心力衰竭、心肌梗死、中风或再次干预的风险没有差异:结论:与男性相比,女性在TAVR术后的存活率更高,出血风险更低。结论:TAVR术后女性存活率高于男性,出血风险低于男性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信