Community-level social capital and subsequent health and well-being among older adults in Japan: An outcome-wide longitudinal approach

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sho Takeda , Maho Haseda , Koryu Sato , Koichiro Shiba , Atsushi Nakagomi , Kazushige Ide , Naoki Kondo
{"title":"Community-level social capital and subsequent health and well-being among older adults in Japan: An outcome-wide longitudinal approach","authors":"Sho Takeda ,&nbsp;Maho Haseda ,&nbsp;Koryu Sato ,&nbsp;Koichiro Shiba ,&nbsp;Atsushi Nakagomi ,&nbsp;Kazushige Ide ,&nbsp;Naoki Kondo","doi":"10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is inconsistent evidence on the association between community-level social capital and the health or well-being of older adults. This study examined the association between community-level social capital and multidimensional health and well-being outcomes using an outcome-wide approach. We used data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study, a nationwide cohort study of Japanese older adults (analytic samples: 47,227 for outcomes obtained from the long-term care insurance registry and 34,183 for other outcomes). We assessed three aspects of school-district-level community social capital in 2016 (civic participation, social cohesion, and reciprocity) and 41 subsequent health and well-being outcomes through 2019. We performed either a modified multilevel Poisson regression or a multilevel logistic regression analysis. We adjusted for pre-baseline characteristics, prior outcome values, and individual-level social capital from the 2013 wave. Even after Bonferroni correction, we found that community-level social capital was associated with some subsequent social well-being and physical/cognitive health. For example, community-level reciprocity was associated with a higher prevalence of taking a social role (Prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02, 1.04) and undergoing health screening (PR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.04). There was modest evidence that community-level civic participation was associated with a higher competency of intellectual activity (PR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.02) and community-level social cohesion was associated with a reduced onset of functional disability (PR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90, 0.98). Community-level social capital may promote social well-being and some physical/cognitive health outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49302,"journal":{"name":"Health & Place","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 103336"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353829224001643/pdfft?md5=c6f7afa5a559f53c748dce1fea639ba8&pid=1-s2.0-S1353829224001643-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Place","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353829224001643","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is inconsistent evidence on the association between community-level social capital and the health or well-being of older adults. This study examined the association between community-level social capital and multidimensional health and well-being outcomes using an outcome-wide approach. We used data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study, a nationwide cohort study of Japanese older adults (analytic samples: 47,227 for outcomes obtained from the long-term care insurance registry and 34,183 for other outcomes). We assessed three aspects of school-district-level community social capital in 2016 (civic participation, social cohesion, and reciprocity) and 41 subsequent health and well-being outcomes through 2019. We performed either a modified multilevel Poisson regression or a multilevel logistic regression analysis. We adjusted for pre-baseline characteristics, prior outcome values, and individual-level social capital from the 2013 wave. Even after Bonferroni correction, we found that community-level social capital was associated with some subsequent social well-being and physical/cognitive health. For example, community-level reciprocity was associated with a higher prevalence of taking a social role (Prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02, 1.04) and undergoing health screening (PR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.04). There was modest evidence that community-level civic participation was associated with a higher competency of intellectual activity (PR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.02) and community-level social cohesion was associated with a reduced onset of functional disability (PR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90, 0.98). Community-level social capital may promote social well-being and some physical/cognitive health outcomes.

社区层面的社会资本与日本老年人随后的健康和福祉:全结果纵向方法。
关于社区层面的社会资本与老年人的健康或幸福之间的关系,目前还没有一致的证据。本研究采用全结果方法研究了社区层面的社会资本与多维健康和幸福结果之间的关系。我们使用了日本老年评估研究(Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study)的数据,该研究是一项针对日本老年人的全国性队列研究(分析样本为 47,227 人,从日本老年评估研究中获得的结果为 47,227 人):从长期护理保险登记处获得的结果样本为 47,227 个,其他结果样本为 34,183 个)。我们评估了 2016 年校区级社区社会资本的三个方面(公民参与、社会凝聚力和互惠性),以及到 2019 年的 41 项后续健康和幸福结果。我们进行了修正的多层次泊松回归或多层次逻辑回归分析。我们对基线前特征、先前的结果值以及 2013 年波浪中的个人社会资本进行了调整。即使经过 Bonferroni 校正,我们仍发现社区层面的社会资本与一些后续的社会福利和身体/认知健康相关。例如,社区层面的互惠与较高的承担社会角色(流行率 [PR] = 1.03,95% 置信区间 [CI] = 1.02,1.04)和接受健康检查(流行率 = 1.03,95% 置信区间:1.01,1.04)相关。有少量证据表明,社区层面的公民参与与较高的智力活动能力相关(PR = 1.01,95% CI:1.01, 1.02),社区层面的社会凝聚力与较低的功能性残疾发病率相关(PR = 0.94,95% CI:0.90, 0.98)。社区层面的社会资本可促进社会福祉和某些身体/认知健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health & Place
Health & Place PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
176
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: he journal is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of health and health care in which place or location matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信