Anesthesiologists ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia core curriculum: a Delphi consensus from Italian regional anesthesia experts.

Alessandro De Cassai, Astrid Behr, Dario Bugada, Danilo Canzio, Gianluca Capelleri, Fabio Costa, Giorgio Danelli, Grazia De Angelis, Romualdo Del Buono, Fabrizio Fattorini, Pierfrancesco Fusco, Fabio Gori, Alberto Manassero, Ilaria Pacini, Giuseppe Pascarella, Mauro Proietti Pannunzi, Gianluca Russo, Raffaele Russo, Domenico Pietro Santonastaso, Marco Scardino, Giuseppe Sepolvere, Paolo Scimia, Alessandro Strumia, Mario Tedesco, Andrea Tognù, Vito Torrano
{"title":"Anesthesiologists ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia core curriculum: a Delphi consensus from Italian regional anesthesia experts.","authors":"Alessandro De Cassai, Astrid Behr, Dario Bugada, Danilo Canzio, Gianluca Capelleri, Fabio Costa, Giorgio Danelli, Grazia De Angelis, Romualdo Del Buono, Fabrizio Fattorini, Pierfrancesco Fusco, Fabio Gori, Alberto Manassero, Ilaria Pacini, Giuseppe Pascarella, Mauro Proietti Pannunzi, Gianluca Russo, Raffaele Russo, Domenico Pietro Santonastaso, Marco Scardino, Giuseppe Sepolvere, Paolo Scimia, Alessandro Strumia, Mario Tedesco, Andrea Tognù, Vito Torrano","doi":"10.1186/s44158-024-00190-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The need for a standardized core curriculum in regional anesthesia has become essential, particularly with the integration of ultrasound revolutionizing and exponentially increasing clinical practice and possibilities. In fact, numerous novel techniques, often overlapping, can confuse practitioners. This study aims to establish a core curriculum for upper limb, lower limb, paraspinal and fascial plane blocks for residency training, addressing potential educational gaps caused by the multitude of techniques, through a Delphi consensus process involving recognized Italian regional anesthesia experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A steering committee was formed in order to select a panel of experts in regional anesthesia. A three-round Delphi consensus was planned: two rounds of electronic voting and a final round of mixed electronic voting and round table discussion. The consensus was defined as ≥ 75% agreement for inclusion and lower than ≤ 25% agreement for exclusion from the core curriculum list. Techniques reaching the 50% threshold were included with low consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine techniques were selected to be included in the ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia core curriculum. Twenty-two were included with strong consensus: Upper limb: interscalene brachial plexus block, supraclavicular brachial plexus block, infraclavicular brachial plexus block, axillary brachial plexus block, intermediate cervical plexus block Lower limb: femoral nerve block, pericapsular nerve group block, adductor canal block, sciatic nerve block (transgluteal approach, infragluteal approach, and at the popliteal fossa), ankle block Paraspinal/fascial plane blocks: erector spinae plane block, deep serratus anterior plane block, superficial pectointercostal plane block, interpectoral plane block, pectoserratus plane block, rectus sheath block, ilioinguinal iliohypogastric nerves block, transversus abdominis plane block (with subcostal and midaxillary approaches) The remaining seven techniques were included with low consensus: superficial cervical plexus block, lumbar plexus block, fascia iliaca block (suprainguinal approach), anterior quadratus lumborum block, lateral quadratus lumborum block, paravertebral block, and serratus anterior plane block.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This curriculum aims to standardize training and ensure that residents acquire the essential skills required for effective and safe practice regardless of the residents' subsequent specialization. By incorporating these techniques, educational programs can provide a structured and consistent approach to regional anesthesia, enhancing the quality of patient care and improving outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11316303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-024-00190-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The need for a standardized core curriculum in regional anesthesia has become essential, particularly with the integration of ultrasound revolutionizing and exponentially increasing clinical practice and possibilities. In fact, numerous novel techniques, often overlapping, can confuse practitioners. This study aims to establish a core curriculum for upper limb, lower limb, paraspinal and fascial plane blocks for residency training, addressing potential educational gaps caused by the multitude of techniques, through a Delphi consensus process involving recognized Italian regional anesthesia experts.

Methods: A steering committee was formed in order to select a panel of experts in regional anesthesia. A three-round Delphi consensus was planned: two rounds of electronic voting and a final round of mixed electronic voting and round table discussion. The consensus was defined as ≥ 75% agreement for inclusion and lower than ≤ 25% agreement for exclusion from the core curriculum list. Techniques reaching the 50% threshold were included with low consensus.

Results: Twenty-nine techniques were selected to be included in the ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia core curriculum. Twenty-two were included with strong consensus: Upper limb: interscalene brachial plexus block, supraclavicular brachial plexus block, infraclavicular brachial plexus block, axillary brachial plexus block, intermediate cervical plexus block Lower limb: femoral nerve block, pericapsular nerve group block, adductor canal block, sciatic nerve block (transgluteal approach, infragluteal approach, and at the popliteal fossa), ankle block Paraspinal/fascial plane blocks: erector spinae plane block, deep serratus anterior plane block, superficial pectointercostal plane block, interpectoral plane block, pectoserratus plane block, rectus sheath block, ilioinguinal iliohypogastric nerves block, transversus abdominis plane block (with subcostal and midaxillary approaches) The remaining seven techniques were included with low consensus: superficial cervical plexus block, lumbar plexus block, fascia iliaca block (suprainguinal approach), anterior quadratus lumborum block, lateral quadratus lumborum block, paravertebral block, and serratus anterior plane block.

Conclusions: This curriculum aims to standardize training and ensure that residents acquire the essential skills required for effective and safe practice regardless of the residents' subsequent specialization. By incorporating these techniques, educational programs can provide a structured and consistent approach to regional anesthesia, enhancing the quality of patient care and improving outcomes.

麻醉医师超声引导区域麻醉核心课程:意大利区域麻醉专家达成的德尔菲共识。
导言:区域麻醉需要一个标准化的核心课程,这一点已变得至关重要,特别是随着超声波的融入,临床实践和可能性发生了革命性的变化并呈指数级增长。事实上,众多新技术往往相互重叠,会使从业人员无所适从。本研究旨在通过德尔菲共识程序,由公认的意大利区域麻醉专家参与,为住院医师培训建立上肢、下肢、脊柱旁和筋膜平面阻滞的核心课程,解决因技术繁多而可能造成的教育差距:方法:成立了一个指导委员会,以挑选区域麻醉专家小组。计划达成三轮德尔菲共识:两轮电子投票,最后一轮混合电子投票和圆桌讨论。共识的定义是:≥ 75% 的一致同意可纳入核心课程列表,低于 25% 的一致同意可排除在核心课程列表之外。达到50%的技术被纳入,但共识度较低:结果:29 项技术被选入超声引导区域麻醉核心课程。结果:29 项技术被选入超声引导下区域麻醉核心课程:上肢:椎间孔臂丛阻滞、锁骨上臂丛阻滞、锁骨下臂丛阻滞、腋窝臂丛阻滞、中颈丛阻滞 下肢:股神经阻滞、包膜神经群阻滞、内收肌管阻滞、坐骨神经阻滞(经臀部入路、臀下入路和腘窝处)、踝关节阻滞 副脊柱/筋膜平面阻滞:直肌鞘阻滞、髂腹股沟髂下胃神经阻滞、腹横肌平面阻滞(采用肋下和腋中入 路):颈浅丛阻滞、腰丛阻滞、髂筋膜阻滞(腹股沟上途径)、腰前区阻滞、腰侧区阻滞、椎旁阻滞和前锯肌平面阻滞。结论:该课程旨在规范培训,确保住院医师掌握有效、安全实践所需的基本技能,无论住院医师以后的专业方向如何。通过纳入这些技术,教育计划可为区域麻醉提供结构化和一致的方法,从而提高患者护理质量并改善疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信