Tatiana Vander, Rozaliya Bikmullina, Naomi Froimovich, Tatiana Stroganova, Andreea Nissenkorn, Tal Gilboa, Dawn Eliashiv, Dana Ekstein, Mordekhay Medvedovsky
{"title":"Economic aspects of prolonged home video-EEG monitoring: a simulation study.","authors":"Tatiana Vander, Rozaliya Bikmullina, Naomi Froimovich, Tatiana Stroganova, Andreea Nissenkorn, Tal Gilboa, Dawn Eliashiv, Dana Ekstein, Mordekhay Medvedovsky","doi":"10.1186/s12962-024-00568-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Video EEG monitoring (VEM) is an important tool for characterizing clinical events suspected as seizures. It is also used for pre-surgical workups in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). In-hospital VEM high cost, long admission waiting periods and some other inconveniences led to an interest in home VEM (HVEM). However, because antiseizure medications cannot be reduced at home, HVEM may require longer monitoring. While the economic aspect is one of the main motivations for HVEM, the cost of HVEM lasting several weeks has not been assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We modeled the cost of HVEM for 8 weeks and compared it to the cost of 1-week in-hospital VEM. Additionally, we modeled the per-patient cost for a combination of HVEM and in-hospital VEM, considering that if in a proportion of patients HVEM fails to achieve its goal, they should undergo in-hospital VEM with drug reduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average cost of HVEM up to 4-6 weeks of monitoring was lower than that for the 1-week in-hospital VEM. Combining the 3-week HVEM with 1-week in-hospital VEM (if needed) reduced the per-patient cost by 6.6-28.6% as compared to the situation when all the patients with DRE were referred to the in-hospital VEM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A prolonged intermittent HVEM can be cost-effective, especially if the minimal seizure frequency is about one seizure per week. The study findings support directing efforts into clinical trials and technology development.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":"22 1","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11316977/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-024-00568-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Video EEG monitoring (VEM) is an important tool for characterizing clinical events suspected as seizures. It is also used for pre-surgical workups in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). In-hospital VEM high cost, long admission waiting periods and some other inconveniences led to an interest in home VEM (HVEM). However, because antiseizure medications cannot be reduced at home, HVEM may require longer monitoring. While the economic aspect is one of the main motivations for HVEM, the cost of HVEM lasting several weeks has not been assessed.
Methods: We modeled the cost of HVEM for 8 weeks and compared it to the cost of 1-week in-hospital VEM. Additionally, we modeled the per-patient cost for a combination of HVEM and in-hospital VEM, considering that if in a proportion of patients HVEM fails to achieve its goal, they should undergo in-hospital VEM with drug reduction.
Results: The average cost of HVEM up to 4-6 weeks of monitoring was lower than that for the 1-week in-hospital VEM. Combining the 3-week HVEM with 1-week in-hospital VEM (if needed) reduced the per-patient cost by 6.6-28.6% as compared to the situation when all the patients with DRE were referred to the in-hospital VEM.
Conclusions: A prolonged intermittent HVEM can be cost-effective, especially if the minimal seizure frequency is about one seizure per week. The study findings support directing efforts into clinical trials and technology development.
期刊介绍:
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of cost-effectiveness analysis, including conceptual or methodological work, economic evaluations, and policy analysis related to resource allocation at a national or international level. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is aimed at health economists, health services researchers, and policy-makers with an interest in enhancing the flow and transfer of knowledge relating to efficiency in the health sector. Manuscripts are encouraged from researchers based in low- and middle-income countries, with a view to increasing the international economic evidence base for health.