The Impact of a Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Nasal Polymerase Chain Reaction Protocol on Vancomycin Length of Therapy Among Patients With Skin and Soft Tissue Infections.

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of pharmacy practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1177/08971900241273175
Anel Couzo, Adia Griffin, Courtney M Willis, Julio Mendez, Kevin L Epps
{"title":"The Impact of a Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Nasal Polymerase Chain Reaction Protocol on Vancomycin Length of Therapy Among Patients With Skin and Soft Tissue Infections.","authors":"Anel Couzo, Adia Griffin, Courtney M Willis, Julio Mendez, Kevin L Epps","doi":"10.1177/08971900241273175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> We evaluated the impact of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol on the vancomycin length of therapy (LOT) for skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). <b>Design:</b> Retrospective quasi-experimental pre- and post- MRSA nasal PCR protocol implementation study. <b>Setting:</b> Tertiary-care academic medical center in Jacksonville, Florida. <b>Patients:</b> Eligible patients received empiric vancomycin for SSTIs from January 1st to September 30th 2020 (pre-implementation group) and from January 1st to September 30th 2022 (post-implementation group). <b>Intervention:</b> The electronic health system software was modified to provide a best-practice advisory (BPA) prompt to the pharmacist upon order verification of vancomycin for patients with SSTIs. <b>Methods:</b> We reviewed patient records to determine the time from vancomycin prescription to de-escalation. The secondary outcomes were incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), number of vancomycin levels collected, and hospital length of stay (LOS). <b>Results:</b> The study included 131 patients (pre-implementation, n = 86 and post-implementation, n = 45). There was no significant difference in vancomycin length of therapy (LOT) between implementation groups: mean LOT in days and standard deviation (SD) were 2.7 (1.9) and 2.6 (1.3), respectively, p-value 0.493. Of significance, in the post-implementation group, vancomycin LOT between patients with a negative and positive MRSA PCR were 2.3 (1.1) and 3.9 (1.6), p-value 0.006. There was no difference in secondary outcomes. <b>Conclusion:</b> The utilization of the MRSA nasal PCR to guide vancomycin de-escalation did not significantly change the vancomycin LOT, however in the post-implementation group there was a significant difference in vancomycin LOT between negative and positive MRSA PCRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"93-98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900241273175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We evaluated the impact of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol on the vancomycin length of therapy (LOT) for skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). Design: Retrospective quasi-experimental pre- and post- MRSA nasal PCR protocol implementation study. Setting: Tertiary-care academic medical center in Jacksonville, Florida. Patients: Eligible patients received empiric vancomycin for SSTIs from January 1st to September 30th 2020 (pre-implementation group) and from January 1st to September 30th 2022 (post-implementation group). Intervention: The electronic health system software was modified to provide a best-practice advisory (BPA) prompt to the pharmacist upon order verification of vancomycin for patients with SSTIs. Methods: We reviewed patient records to determine the time from vancomycin prescription to de-escalation. The secondary outcomes were incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), number of vancomycin levels collected, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Results: The study included 131 patients (pre-implementation, n = 86 and post-implementation, n = 45). There was no significant difference in vancomycin length of therapy (LOT) between implementation groups: mean LOT in days and standard deviation (SD) were 2.7 (1.9) and 2.6 (1.3), respectively, p-value 0.493. Of significance, in the post-implementation group, vancomycin LOT between patients with a negative and positive MRSA PCR were 2.3 (1.1) and 3.9 (1.6), p-value 0.006. There was no difference in secondary outcomes. Conclusion: The utilization of the MRSA nasal PCR to guide vancomycin de-escalation did not significantly change the vancomycin LOT, however in the post-implementation group there was a significant difference in vancomycin LOT between negative and positive MRSA PCRs.

耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌鼻腔聚合酶链反应方案对皮肤和软组织感染患者万古霉素疗程的影响
目的我们评估了耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)鼻腔聚合酶链反应(PCR)方案对万古霉素治疗皮肤和软组织感染(SSTI)疗程(LOT)的影响。设计:MRSA鼻腔聚合酶链反应方案实施前后的回顾性准实验研究。地点:三级学术医疗中心佛罗里达州杰克逊维尔市的三级学术医疗中心。患者:符合条件的患者在 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 9 月 30 日期间(实施前组)和 2022 年 1 月 1 日至 9 月 30 日期间(实施后组)接受万古霉素治疗 SSTI。干预措施:对电子医疗系统软件进行修改,以便在对 SSTI 患者的万古霉素订单进行验证时向药剂师提供最佳实践建议 (BPA) 提示。方法:我们审查了患者的病历,以确定从开具万古霉素处方到解除处方的时间。次要结果是急性肾损伤(AKI)的发生率、万古霉素水平的采集次数和住院时间(LOS)。研究结果研究共纳入 131 名患者(实施前为 86 人,实施后为 45 人)。实施组之间的万古霉素疗程(LOT)无明显差异:平均疗程天数和标准差(SD)分别为 2.7 (1.9) 和 2.6 (1.3),P 值为 0.493。值得注意的是,在实施后组,MRSA PCR 阴性和阳性患者的万古霉素 LOT 天数分别为 2.3 (1.1) 和 3.9 (1.6),P 值为 0.006。次要结果无差异。结论使用 MRSA 鼻腔 PCR 指导万古霉素降级并不会显著改变万古霉素 LOT,但在实施后的组别中,MRSA PCR 阴性和阳性患者的万古霉素 LOT 有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信