Intraoperative zero-heat-flux thermometry overestimates nasopharyngeal temperature by 0.39 °C: an observational study in patients undergoing congenital heart surgery.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Ivo F Brandes, Theodor Tirilomis, Marcus Nemeth, Johannes Wieditz, Anselm Bräuer
{"title":"Intraoperative zero-heat-flux thermometry overestimates nasopharyngeal temperature by 0.39 °C: an observational study in patients undergoing congenital heart surgery.","authors":"Ivo F Brandes, Theodor Tirilomis, Marcus Nemeth, Johannes Wieditz, Anselm Bräuer","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01204-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During surgery for congenital heart disease (CHD) temperature management is crucial. Vesical (T<sub>ves</sub>) and nasopharyngeal (T<sub>NPH</sub>) temperature are usually measured. Whereas T<sub>ves</sub> slowly responds to temperature changes, T<sub>NPH</sub> carries the risk of bleeding. The zero-heat-flux (ZHF) temperature monitoring systems SpotOn™ (T<sub>SpotOn</sub>), and Tcore™ (T<sub>core</sub>) measure temperature non-invasively. We evaluated accuracy and precision of the non-invasive devices, and of T<sub>ves</sub> compared to T<sub>NPH</sub> for estimating temperature. In this prospective observational study in pediatric and adult patients accuracy and precision of T<sub>SpotOn</sub>, T<sub>core</sub>, and T<sub>ves</sub> were analyzed using the Bland-Altman method. Proportion of differences (PoD) and Lin´s concordance correlation coefficient (LCC) were calculated. Data of 47 patients resulted in sets of matched measurements: 1073 for T<sub>SpotOn</sub> vs. T<sub>NPH</sub>, 874 for T<sub>core</sub> vs. T<sub>NPH</sub>, and 1102 for T<sub>ves</sub> vs. T<sub>NPH</sub>. Accuracy was - 0.39 °C for T<sub>SpotOn</sub>, -0.09 °C for T<sub>core</sub>, and 0.07 °C for T<sub>ves</sub>. Precisison was between - 1.12 and 0.35 °C for T<sub>SpotOn</sub>, -0.88 to 0.71 °C for T<sub>core</sub>, and - 1.90 to 2.05 °C for T<sub>ves</sub>. PoD ≤ 0.5 °C were 71% for T<sub>SpotOn</sub>, 71% for T<sub>core</sub>, and 60% for T<sub>ves</sub>. LCC was 0.9455 for T<sub>SpotOn</sub>, 0.9510 for T<sub>core</sub>, and 0.9322 for T<sub>ves</sub>. Temperatures below 25.2 °C (T<sub>SpotOn</sub>) or 27.1 (T<sub>core</sub>) could not be recorded non-invasively, but only with T<sub>ves</sub>. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00010720.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"205-215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11821722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01204-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During surgery for congenital heart disease (CHD) temperature management is crucial. Vesical (Tves) and nasopharyngeal (TNPH) temperature are usually measured. Whereas Tves slowly responds to temperature changes, TNPH carries the risk of bleeding. The zero-heat-flux (ZHF) temperature monitoring systems SpotOn™ (TSpotOn), and Tcore™ (Tcore) measure temperature non-invasively. We evaluated accuracy and precision of the non-invasive devices, and of Tves compared to TNPH for estimating temperature. In this prospective observational study in pediatric and adult patients accuracy and precision of TSpotOn, Tcore, and Tves were analyzed using the Bland-Altman method. Proportion of differences (PoD) and Lin´s concordance correlation coefficient (LCC) were calculated. Data of 47 patients resulted in sets of matched measurements: 1073 for TSpotOn vs. TNPH, 874 for Tcore vs. TNPH, and 1102 for Tves vs. TNPH. Accuracy was - 0.39 °C for TSpotOn, -0.09 °C for Tcore, and 0.07 °C for Tves. Precisison was between - 1.12 and 0.35 °C for TSpotOn, -0.88 to 0.71 °C for Tcore, and - 1.90 to 2.05 °C for Tves. PoD ≤ 0.5 °C were 71% for TSpotOn, 71% for Tcore, and 60% for Tves. LCC was 0.9455 for TSpotOn, 0.9510 for Tcore, and 0.9322 for Tves. Temperatures below 25.2 °C (TSpotOn) or 27.1 (Tcore) could not be recorded non-invasively, but only with Tves. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00010720.

Abstract Image

术中零热流测温仪高估鼻咽温度 0.39 °C:一项针对先天性心脏病手术患者的观察性研究。
先天性心脏病(CHD)手术期间的体温管理至关重要。通常要测量膀胱温度(Tves)和鼻咽温度(TNPH)。Tves 对温度变化的反应较慢,而 TNPH 则有出血的风险。零热流(ZHF)体温监测系统 SpotOn™ (TSpotOn) 和 Tcore™ (Tcore) 可以无创测量体温。我们评估了无创设备的准确性和精确度,以及 Tves 与 TNPH 相比在估计体温方面的准确性和精确度。在这项针对儿童和成人患者的前瞻性观察研究中,我们使用 Bland-Altman 方法分析了 TSpotOn、Tcore 和 Tves 的准确度和精确度。计算了差异比例(PoD)和林氏一致性相关系数(LCC)。对 47 名患者的数据进行了成套匹配测量:TSpotOn与TNPH的匹配测量值为1073,Tcore与TNPH的匹配测量值为874,Tves与TNPH的匹配测量值为1102。TSpotOn 的准确度为 - 0.39 °C,Tcore 为 -0.09 °C,Tves 为 0.07 °C。精确度为:TSpotOn - 1.12 至 0.35 °C,Tcore - 0.88 至 0.71 °C,Tves - 1.90 至 2.05 °C。TSpotOn 的 PoD ≤ 0.5 °C、Tcore 的 PoD ≤ 0.5 °C、Tves 的 PoD ≤ 0.5 °C分别为 71%、71% 和 60%。TSpotOn 的 LCC 为 0.9455,Tcore 为 0.9510,Tves 为 0.9322。温度低于 25.2 °C(TSpotOn)或 27.1 °C(Tcore)时无法进行无创记录,只能通过 Tves 记录。试验注册 德国临床试验注册,DRKS00010720。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信