An Evaluation of the Replacement of Animal-derived Biomaterials in Human Primary Cell Culture.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1177/02611929241269004
Laura R Bramwell, Samantha J Gould, Merlin Davies, Conor McMullan, Emily C Trusler, Lorna W Harries
{"title":"An Evaluation of the Replacement of Animal-derived Biomaterials in Human Primary Cell Culture.","authors":"Laura R Bramwell, Samantha J Gould, Merlin Davies, Conor McMullan, Emily C Trusler, Lorna W Harries","doi":"10.1177/02611929241269004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The likelihood that potential new drugs will successfully navigate the current translational pipeline is poor, with fewer than 10% of drug candidates making this transition successfully, even after their entry into clinical trials. Prior to this stage, candidate drugs are typically evaluated by using models of increasing complexity, beginning with basic <i>in vitro</i> cell culture studies and progressing through to animal studies, where many of these candidates are lost due to lack of efficacy or toxicology concerns. There are many reasons for this poor translation, but interspecies differences in functional and physiological parameters undoubtedly contribute to the problem. Improving the human-relevance of early preclinical <i>in vitro</i> models may help translatability, especially when targeting more nuanced species-specific cell processes. The aim of the current study was to define a set of guidelines for the effective transition of human primary cells of multiple lineages to more physiologically relevant, translatable, animal-free <i>in vitro</i> culture conditions. Animal-derived biomaterials (ADBs) were systematically replaced with non-animal-derived alternatives in the <i>in vitro</i> cell culture systems, and the impact of the substitutions subsequently assessed by comparing the kinetics and phenotypes of the cultured cells. ADBs were successfully eliminated from primary human dermal fibroblast, uterine fibroblast, pulmonary fibroblast, retinal endothelial cell and peripheral blood mononuclear cell culture systems, and the individual requirements of each cell subtype were defined to ensure the successful transition toward growth under animal-free culture conditions. We demonstrate that it is possible to transition ('humanise') a diverse set of human primary cell types by following a set of simple overarching principles that inform the selection, and guide the evaluation of new, improved, human-relevant <i>in vitro</i> culture conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":" ","pages":"247-260"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929241269004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The likelihood that potential new drugs will successfully navigate the current translational pipeline is poor, with fewer than 10% of drug candidates making this transition successfully, even after their entry into clinical trials. Prior to this stage, candidate drugs are typically evaluated by using models of increasing complexity, beginning with basic in vitro cell culture studies and progressing through to animal studies, where many of these candidates are lost due to lack of efficacy or toxicology concerns. There are many reasons for this poor translation, but interspecies differences in functional and physiological parameters undoubtedly contribute to the problem. Improving the human-relevance of early preclinical in vitro models may help translatability, especially when targeting more nuanced species-specific cell processes. The aim of the current study was to define a set of guidelines for the effective transition of human primary cells of multiple lineages to more physiologically relevant, translatable, animal-free in vitro culture conditions. Animal-derived biomaterials (ADBs) were systematically replaced with non-animal-derived alternatives in the in vitro cell culture systems, and the impact of the substitutions subsequently assessed by comparing the kinetics and phenotypes of the cultured cells. ADBs were successfully eliminated from primary human dermal fibroblast, uterine fibroblast, pulmonary fibroblast, retinal endothelial cell and peripheral blood mononuclear cell culture systems, and the individual requirements of each cell subtype were defined to ensure the successful transition toward growth under animal-free culture conditions. We demonstrate that it is possible to transition ('humanise') a diverse set of human primary cell types by following a set of simple overarching principles that inform the selection, and guide the evaluation of new, improved, human-relevant in vitro culture conditions.

评估人类原代细胞培养中动物源生物材料的替代性。
潜在新药成功通过当前转化管道的可能性很小,即使在进入临床试验后,也只有不到 10%的候选药物能成功通过转化管道。在这一阶段之前,候选药物通常要使用复杂程度越来越高的模型进行评估,从基本的体外细胞培养研究开始,一直到动物实验,许多候选药物由于缺乏疗效或毒理学问题而在动物实验中夭折。造成这种转化效果不佳的原因有很多,但功能和生理参数的种间差异无疑是造成这一问题的原因之一。提高早期临床前体外模型与人类的相关性可能有助于转化,尤其是在针对更细微的物种特异性细胞过程时。当前研究的目的是为人类多系原代细胞有效过渡到更贴近生理、可转化、无动物的体外培养条件确定一套指导原则。在体外细胞培养系统中,用非动物来源的替代品系统地替代了动物来源的生物材料(ADB),随后通过比较培养细胞的动力学和表型评估了替代品的影响。我们成功地消除了原代人类真皮成纤维细胞、子宫成纤维细胞、肺成纤维细胞、视网膜内皮细胞和外周血单核细胞培养系统中的 ADB,并确定了每种细胞亚型的个体需求,以确保成功过渡到无动物培养条件下的生长。我们证明,通过遵循一系列简单的总体原则,可以过渡("人源化")多种人类原代细胞类型,这些原则为选择和评估新的、改进的、与人类相关的体外培养条件提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信